IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v263y2023ipcs0360544222027864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Jun Young
  • Kim, Dongjae
  • Li, Zezhong John
  • Dariva, Claudio
  • Cao, Yankai
  • Ellis, Naoko

Abstract

Biomass gasification is one of the primary thermal conversion processes where fluidized bed reactors are often used to produce syngas with low heating values. However, there has not yet been an effective model to predict gasification yield with broad applicability. In this study, machine learning was adopted to realize the prediction of syngas compositions and lower heating values (LHV) using various lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks at a wide range of operating conditions. Three machine learning techniques, i.e., Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) were adopted after determining hyperparameters optimization. Pearson correlation and permutation importance were used for the sensitivity analysis. RF and ANN were found to have high prediction accuracy with R2 and RMSE results (RF: R2=0.809–0.946, RMSE=1.39–11.54%; ANN: R2=0.565–0.924, RMSE=1.46–10.56%). Monte Carlo filtering (MCF) was integrated into the three machine learning algorithms to forecast the desired products by predicting the important features of the operating conditions and biomass characteristics. Considering the desired H2/CO > 1.1 and LHV > 5.86 MJ/m3, the RF-MCF was a more suitable approach with R2=0.791–0.902 for H2, CO and LHV features. The machine learning approach can be widely adapted in various scenarios predicting output features as well as MCF for finding the significant variables for optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Jun Young & Kim, Dongjae & Li, Zezhong John & Dariva, Claudio & Cao, Yankai & Ellis, Naoko, 2023. "Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pc:s0360544222027864
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222027864
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xing, Jiangkuan & Luo, Kun & Wang, Haiou & Gao, Zhengwei & Fan, Jianren, 2019. "A comprehensive study on estimating higher heating value of biomass from proximate and ultimate analysis with machine learning approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    3. Xing, Jiangkuan & Wang, Haiou & Luo, Kun & Wang, Shuai & Bai, Yun & Fan, Jianren, 2019. "Predictive single-step kinetic model of biomass devolatilization for CFD applications: A comparison study of empirical correlations (EC), artificial neural networks (ANN) and random forest (RF)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 104-114.
    4. Tavares, Raquel & Monteiro, Eliseu & Tabet, Fouzi & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Numerical investigation of optimum operating conditions for syngas and hydrogen production from biomass gasification using Aspen Plus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1309-1314.
    5. Antoniadis, Anestis & Lambert-Lacroix, Sophie & Poggi, Jean-Michel, 2021. "Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Mutlu, Ali Yener & Yucel, Ozgun, 2018. "An artificial intelligence based approach to predicting syngas composition for downdraft biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 895-901.
    7. José Luis Fernández & Felicia Sáez & Eulogio Castro & Paloma Manzanares & Mercedes Ballesteros & María José Negro, 2019. "Determination of the Lignocellulosic Components of Olive Tree Pruning Biomass by Near Infrared Spectroscopy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-10, June.
    8. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    9. Ahmad, Anis Atikah & Zawawi, Norfadhila Abdullah & Kasim, Farizul Hafiz & Inayat, Abrar & Khasri, Azduwin, 2016. "Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1333-1347.
    10. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Pal, K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 363-384.
    11. Parthasarathy, Prakash & Narayanan, K. Sheeba, 2014. "Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield – A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 570-579.
    12. Dwivedi, Gaurav & Sharma, M.P., 2014. "Impact of cold flow properties of biodiesel on engine performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 650-656.
    13. Marcin Siedlecki & Wiebren De Jong & Adrian H.M. Verkooijen, 2011. "Fluidized Bed Gasification as a Mature And Reliable Technology for the Production of Bio-Syngas and Applied in the Production of Liquid Transportation Fuels—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Chongyao & Wang, Xin & Wang, Huaiyu & Xu, Yonghong & Ge, Yunshan & Tan, Jianwei & Hao, Lijun & Wang, Yachao & Zhang, Mengzhu & Li, Ruonan, 2024. "Co-optimizing NOx emission and power output of a natural gas engine-ORC combined system through neural networks and genetic algorithms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    2. Ma, Zherui & Wang, Jiangjiang & Feng, Yingsong & Wang, Ruikun & Zhao, Zhenghui & Chen, Hongwei, 2023. "Hydrogen yield prediction for supercritical water gasification based on generative adversarial network data augmentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Kim, Jun Young & Shin, Ui Hyeon & Kim, Kwangsu, 2023. "Predicting biomass composition and operating conditions in fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: An automated machine learning approach combined with cooperative game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Qi, Jingwei & Wang, Yijie & Xu, Pengcheng & Hu, Ming & Huhe, Taoli & Ling, Xiang & Yuan, Haoran & Chen, Yong, 2024. "Study on the Co-gasification characteristics of biomass and municipal solid waste based on machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    5. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & He, Chang, 2024. "Unlocking waste potential: A neural network approach to forecasting sustainable acetaldehyde production from ethanol upcycling in biomass waste gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    6. Zheng, Zhihang & Xiao, Jian & Yang, Ying & Xu, Feng & Zhou, Jin & Liu, Hongcheng, 2024. "Optimization of exterior wall insulation in office buildings based on wall orientation: Economic, energy and carbon saving potential in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    3. Kim, Jun Young & Shin, Ui Hyeon & Kim, Kwangsu, 2023. "Predicting biomass composition and operating conditions in fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: An automated machine learning approach combined with cooperative game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Matheus Oliveira & Ana Ramos & Tamer M. Ismail & Eliseu Monteiro & Abel Rouboa, 2022. "A Review on Plasma Gasification of Solid Residues: Recent Advances and Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    6. Ajorloo, Mojtaba & Ghodrat, Maryam & Scott, Jason & Strezov, Vladimir, 2022. "Modelling and statistical analysis of plastic biomass mixture co-gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    7. Büyükkanber, Kaan & Haykiri-Acma, Hanzade & Yaman, Serdar, 2023. "Calorific value prediction of coal and its optimization by machine learning based on limited samples in a wide range," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    8. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.
    9. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Niu, Miaomiao & Huang, Yaji & Jin, Baosheng & Liang, Shaohua & Dong, Qing & Gu, Haiming & Sun, Rongyue, 2019. "A novel two-stage enriched air biomass gasification for producing low-tar high heating value fuel gas: Pilot verification and performance analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 511-522.
    11. Chen, Guan-Bang & Wu, Fang-Hsien & Fang, Tzu-Lu & Lin, Hsien-Tsung & Chao, Yei-Chin, 2021. "A study of Co-gasification of sewage sludge and palm kernel shells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Kartal, Furkan & Özveren, Uğur, 2020. "A deep learning approach for prediction of syngas lower heating value from CFB gasifier in Aspen plus®," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Díaz González, Carlos A. & Pacheco Sandoval, Leonardo, 2020. "Sustainability aspects of biomass gasification systems for small power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Alexander N. Kozlov & Nikita V. Tomin & Denis N. Sidorov & Electo E. S. Lora & Victor G. Kurbatsky, 2020. "Optimal Operation Control of PV-Biomass Gasifier-Diesel-Hybrid Systems Using Reinforcement Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    16. Alejandro Lyons Cerón & Alar Konist & Heidi Lees & Oliver Järvik, 2021. "Effect of Woody Biomass Gasification Process Conditions on the Composition of the Producer Gas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Guido Busca, 2021. "Production of Gasolines and Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: From Fossil Raw Materials to Green Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-32, July.
    19. Zhang, Bowei & Guo, Simao & Jin, Hui, 2022. "Production forecast analysis of BP neural network based on Yimin lignite supercritical water gasification experiment results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    20. Rakesh N, & Dasappa, S., 2018. "A critical assessment of tar generated during biomass gasification - Formation, evaluation, issues and mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1045-1064.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:263:y:2023:i:pc:s0360544222027864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.