IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11763-d663921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Woody Biomass Gasification Process Conditions on the Composition of the Producer Gas

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Lyons Cerón

    (Department of Energy Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Alar Konist

    (Department of Energy Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Heidi Lees

    (Department of Energy Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Oliver Järvik

    (Department of Energy Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616 Tallinn, Estonia)

Abstract

Using woody biomass in thermochemical gasification can be a viable alternative for producing renewable energy. The type of biomass and the process parameters influence the producer gas composition and quality. This paper presents research on the composition of the producer gas from the gasification of three woody biomass species: spruce, alder, and pine. The experiments were conducted in a drop-tube reactor at temperatures of 750, 850, and 950 °C, using air as the gasifying agent, with equivalence ratios of 0.38 and 0.19. Gas chromatography with a thermal conductivity detector was used to determine the composition of the producer gas, while the production of total organic compounds was detected using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. All three wood species exhibited very similar producer gas composition. The highest concentration of combustible gases was recorded at 950 °C, with an average of 4.1, 20.5, and 4.6 vol% for H 2 , CO, and CH 4 , respectively, and a LHV ranging from 4.3–5.1 MJ/m 3 . The results were in accordance with other gasification studies of woody species. Higher temperatures enhanced the composition of the producer gas by promoting endothermic and exothermic gasification reactions, increasing gas production while lowering solid and tar yields. The highest concentrations of combustible gases were observed with an equivalence ratio of 0.38. Continuous TOC measurement allowed understanding the evolution of the gasification process and the relation between a higher production of TOC and CO as the gasification temperature raised.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Lyons Cerón & Alar Konist & Heidi Lees & Oliver Järvik, 2021. "Effect of Woody Biomass Gasification Process Conditions on the Composition of the Producer Gas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11763-:d:663921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11763/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11763/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    2. Yahaya, Ahmad Zubair & Somalu, Mahendra Rao & Muchtar, Andanastuti & Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar & Wan Daud, Wan Ramli, 2019. "Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 931-940.
    3. Vinayak Laxman Pachapur & Prianka Kutty & Preetika Pachapur & Satinder Kaur Brar & Yann Le Bihan & Rosa Galvez-Cloutier & Gerardo Buelna, 2019. "Seed Pretreatment for Increased Hydrogen Production Using Mixed-Culture Systems with Advantages over Pure-Culture Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Chaurasia, Ashish, 2016. "Modeling, simulation and optimization of downdraft gasifier: Studies on chemical kinetics and operating conditions on the performance of the biomass gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1065-1076.
    5. Ahmad, Anis Atikah & Zawawi, Norfadhila Abdullah & Kasim, Farizul Hafiz & Inayat, Abrar & Khasri, Azduwin, 2016. "Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1333-1347.
    6. Sansaniwal, S.K. & Pal, K. & Rosen, M.A. & Tyagi, S.K., 2017. "Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 363-384.
    7. Ferreiro, A.I. & Segurado, R. & Costa, M., 2020. "Modelling soot formation during biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Emami Taba, Leila & Irfan, Muhammad Faisal & Wan Daud, Wan Ashri Mohd & Chakrabarti, Mohammed Harun, 2012. "The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5584-5596.
    9. He, Qing & Guo, Qinghua & Umeki, Kentaro & Ding, Lu & Wang, Fuchen & Yu, Guangsuo, 2021. "Soot formation during biomass gasification: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahmoud G. Hemeida & Ashraf M. Hemeida & Tomonobu Senjyu & Dina Osheba, 2022. "Renewable Energy Resources Technologies and Life Cycle Assessment: Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-36, December.
    2. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Mohamad Yusof Idroas & Thanh Danh Le & Huu Tho Nguyen, 2022. "Experimental Studies of Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Biomass Producer Gas (BPG) in a Constant Volume Combustion Chamber (CVCC) System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Alejandro Lyons Cerón & Alar Konist, 2023. "Co-Pyrolysis of Woody Biomass and Oil Shale in a Batch Reactor in CO 2 , CO 2 -H 2 O, and Ar Atmospheres," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C., 2021. "Industrial gasification systems (>3 MWth) for bioenergy in Europe: Current status and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-267.
    3. Yahaya, Ahmad Zubair & Somalu, Mahendra Rao & Muchtar, Andanastuti & Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar & Wan Daud, Wan Ramli, 2019. "Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 931-940.
    4. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    5. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    6. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Kim, Jun Young & Kim, Dongjae & Li, Zezhong John & Dariva, Claudio & Cao, Yankai & Ellis, Naoko, 2023. "Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    8. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Abd El-Salam, M. & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Experimental and modeling studies of Portuguese peach stone gasification on an autothermal bubbling fluidized bed pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 862-877.
    9. Natarianto Indrawan & Betty Simkins & Ajay Kumar & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2020. "Economics of Distributed Power Generation via Gasification of Biomass and Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    11. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    12. Motta, Ingrid Lopes & Miranda, Nahieh Toscano & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Wolf Maciel, Maria Regina, 2018. "Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 998-1023.
    13. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Chen, Tao & Sjöblom, Jonas & Ström, Henrik, 2022. "Numerical investigations of soot generation during wood-log combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    15. Li, Jun & Xie, Yingpu & Zeng, Kuo & Flamant, Gilles & Yang, Haiping & Yang, Xinyi & Zhong, Dian & Du, Zhenyi & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Biomass gasification in molten salt for syngas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    16. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    17. Naqvi, Salman Raza & Naqvi, Muhammad & Ammar Taqvi, Syed Ali & Iqbal, Farukh & Inayat, Abrar & Khoja, Asif Hussain & Mehran, Muhammad Taqi & Ayoub, Muhammad & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Saidina Amin, Nor Ais, 2021. "Agro-industrial residue gasification feasibility in captive power plants: A South-Asian case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    18. Ram, Mahendra & Mondal, Monoj Kumar, 2019. "Investigation on fuel gas production from pulp and paper waste water impregnated coconut husk in fluidized bed gasifier via humidified air and CO2 gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 522-529.
    19. Shahbeik, Hossein & Peng, Wanxi & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dehhaghi, Mona & Guillemin, Gilles J. & Fallahi, Alireza & Amiri, Hamid & Rehan, Mohammad & Raikwar, Deepak & Latine, Hannes & Pandalon, 2022. "Synthesis of liquid biofuels from biomass by hydrothermal gasification: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Dong, Lei & Tao, Junyu & Zhang, Zhaoling & Yan, Beibei & Cheng, Zhanjun & Chen, Guanyi, 2021. "Energy utilization and disposal of herb residue by an integrated energy conversion system: A pilot scale study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11763-:d:663921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.