IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7277-d838427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Sustainable Type Division of Fishery Science and Technology Innovation Efficiency in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wendong Zhu

    (Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Dahai Li

    (Marine Development Research Institute, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Limin Han

    (Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
    Marine Development Research Institute, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

Abstract

Science and technology innovation is an important driving force to promote the development of fishery industry, and is very important to improve the quality of fishery development. In this study, the Super-SBM model was used to evaluate the fishery science and technology innovation efficiency of 30 provinces and cities in China (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and Tibet) from 2011 to 2020. Combined with the kernel density estimation, the spatial and temporal differentiation characteristics were analyzed. Then, from the two dimensions of investment scale and innovation efficiency, the sustainable development types of fishery science and technology innovation were classified. The results show the following: (1) From the perspective of efficiency change, the overall efficiency of fishery science and technology innovation in China increased first and then decreased during 2011–2020, but the overall efficiency level was low, and the efficiency difference between regions gradually widened, and the eastern coastal regions became the development core of fishery science and technology innovation. (2) From the perspective of spatial differentiation characteristics, there was a large gap between the coastal and inland areas in China. The high-efficiency areas were mainly concentrated in the coastal provinces and cities, such as Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shandong, Shanghai and Tianjin, showing a decreasing trend from east to west. (3) From the perspective of investment scale and innovation efficiency, the study regions can be divided into four types: leading area, breakthrough area, catch-up area and backward area. This paper mainly calculates the efficiency of fishery science and technology innovation in various regions, and divides the type areas of fishery science and technology innovation and development. According to the advantages and problems of different types of areas, different development strategies and correction measures are proposed, which can effectively improve the efficiency of resource utilization, avoid resource waste and realize the sustainable development of fishery.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendong Zhu & Dahai Li & Limin Han, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Sustainable Type Division of Fishery Science and Technology Innovation Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7277-:d:838427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pengshan Li & Yahui Lv & Chao Zhang & Wenju Yun & Jianyu Yang & Dehai Zhu, 2016. "Analysis and Planning of Ecological Networks Based on Kernel Density Estimations for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Siran Fang & Xiaoshan Xue & Ge Yin & Hong Fang & Jialin Li & Yongnian Zhang, 2020. "Evaluation and Improvement of Technological Innovation Efficiency of New Energy Vehicle Enterprises in China Based on DEA-Tobit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Kao, Chiang, 2016. "Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 778-786.
    4. Shijin Wang & Guihong Hua & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Urbanization, Air Quality, and the Panel Threshold Effect in China Based on Kernel Density Estimation," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 3575-3590, December.
    5. Benedetto, F. & Giunta, G. & Mastroeni, L., 2016. "On the predictability of energy commodity markets by an entropy-based computational method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 302-312.
    6. Hsuan-Shih Lee, 2021. "An integrated model for SBM and Super-SBM DEA models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(5), pages 1174-1182, May.
    7. Kim, Junyung & Shah, Asad Ullah Amin & Kang, Hyun Gook, 2020. "Dynamic risk assessment with bayesian network and clustering analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. W. Na & Z. C. Zhao, 2021. "The comprehensive evaluation method of low-carbon campus based on analytic hierarchy process and weights of entropy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9308-9319, June.
    9. Yongfeng Zhu & Zilong Wang & Shilei Qiu & Lingling Zhu, 2019. "Effects of Environmental Regulations on Technological Innovation Efficiency in China’s Industrial Enterprises: A Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Zhefan Piao & Yueqin Lin, 2020. "Financing innovation and enterprises’ efficiency of technological innovation in the internet industry: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Du, Juan & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: A comment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 694-697, August.
    12. Weijiang Liu & Yue Bai, 2021. "An Analysis on the Influence of R&D Fiscal and Tax Subsidies on Regional Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Willem Boshoff & Rossouw van Jaarsveld, 2019. "Market Definition Using Consumer Characteristics and Cluster Analysis," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 87(3), pages 302-325, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuegang Song & Songlin Jin & Zhenhui Li, 2022. "Venture Capital and Chinese Firms’ Technological Innovation Capability: Effective Evaluation and Mechanism Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Yunyao Li & Yanji Ma, 2022. "Research on Industrial Innovation Efficiency and the Influencing Factors of the Old Industrial Base Based on the Lock-In Effect, a Case Study of Jilin Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Hong Chen & Haowen Zhu & Tianchen Sun & Xiangyu Chen & Tao Wang & Wenhong Li, 2023. "Does Environmental Regulation Promote Corporate Green Innovation? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Carbon Capture Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Ying Zhang & Haiyan Jia, 2024. "The Driving Factors and Path Selection for the Development Level of China’s Mariculture—A Dynamic Analysis Based on the TOE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2022. "Integrating SBM model and Super-SBM model: a one-model approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2021. "Does China's new energy vehicle industry innovate efficiently? A three-stage dynamic network slacks-based measure approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Mohammad Tavassoli & Mahsa Ghandehari & Masoud Taherinia, 2023. "Rang-adjusted measure: modelling and computational aspects from internal and external perspectives for network DEA," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1-34, December.
    4. Afshin Shariat & Zahra Hosseinnejad & Alireza Pooya, 2024. "Using the optimal control technique in facilities sharing to increased units’ efficiency," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 741-761, June.
    5. Danijela Tuljak-Suban & Patricija Bajec, 2022. "A Hybrid DEA Approach for the Upgrade of an Existing Bike-Sharing System with Electric Bikes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Loretta Mastroeni & Alessandro Mazzoccoli & Greta Quaresima & Pierluigi Vellucci, 2021. "Wavelet analysis and energy-based measures for oil-food price relationship as a footprint of financialisation effect," Papers 2104.11891, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    7. Phung, Manh-Trung & Cheng, Cheng-Ping & Guo, Chuanyin & Kao, Chen-Yu, 2020. "Mixed Network DEA with Shared Resources: A Case of Measuring Performance for Banking Industry," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    8. Xiao, Huijuan & Wang, Daoping & Qi, Yu & Shao, Shuai & Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli, 2021. "The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Onder Belgin, 2024. "Efficiency Analysis of EU and Non-EU R&D Investor Firms on Matched Samples," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13601-13621, September.
    10. Mastroeni, Loretta & Mazzoccoli, Alessandro & Vellucci, Pierluigi, 2024. "Wavelet entropy and complexity–entropy curves approach for energy commodity price predictability amid the transition to alternative energy sources," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Juan Du & Justin Wang & Yao Chen & Shin-Yi Chou & Joe Zhu, 2014. "Incorporating health outcomes in Pennsylvania hospital efficiency: an additive super-efficiency DEA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 161-172, October.
    12. Siqi Che & Rongting Li, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of BYD and Tesla’s CSR Image Construction through CSR Reports," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(4), pages 106-106, July.
    13. Yaliu Yang & Yuan Wang & Cui Wang & Yingyan Zhang & Cuixia Zhang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of the Science and Technology Innovative Efficiency of Regional Industrial Enterprises: A Data-Driven Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Loretta Mastroeni & Pierluigi Vellucci, 2017. "“Chaos” In Energy And Commodity Markets: A Controversial Matter," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0218, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    15. Shengyuan Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Sustainability of China’s New Energy Vehicle Development: Fresh Evidence from Population Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Vicente J. Bolós & Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano, 2023. "Continuous models combining slacks-based measures of efficiency and super-efficiency," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 363-391, June.
    18. Jiaqi Chen & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2023. "Cournot–Bertrand comparisons under R&D competition: Output versus R&D subsidies," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(1), pages 77-100, March.
    19. Kyshakevych, Bohdan & Melnyk, Olga & Maksyshko, Natalia & Maturin, Yuriy & Kotyk, Yaroslaw, . "Systemic issues and efficiency reserves in EU agriculture: a slack-based DEA approach," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(1).
    20. Anis Hoayek & Hassan Hamie & Hans Auer, 2020. "Modeling the Price Stability and Predictability of Post Liberalized Gas Markets Using the Theory of Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7277-:d:838427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.