IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p68-d708283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Impacts of Non-Tariff Measures in the Indian Ocean Rim Association

Author

Listed:
  • Abdallah Akintola

    (Department of Natural Resource Economics, College of Agricultural and Marine Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Houcine Boughanmi

    (Department of Natural Resource Economics, College of Agricultural and Marine Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman
    WTO Chairs Programme, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Alessandro Antimiani

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Lokman Zaibet

    (Department of Natural Resource Economics, College of Agricultural and Marine Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Hemesiri Kotagama

    (Department of Natural Resource Economics, College of Agricultural and Marine Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman)

Abstract

In recent years, the Indian Ocean Rim Association has witnessed an increasing trend in the use of non-tariff measures (NTMs). This study evaluated the impact of NTMs in the Indian Ocean Rim Association through estimations of their ad valorem equivalents at the HS chapter and country levels. A gravity model using NTM count data (intensity) was specified and estimated to derive the importer-specific ad valorem equivalents for the four (4) most used NTMs in the region. The results showed the presence of both import-impeding and import-promoting effects of NTMs; however, the import-impeding effects dominated in the region. The quantitative restriction and safeguard measures were more restrictive compared to the sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers to trade. This was expected since quantitative restrictions are trade-distorting by design. This calls for reforming trade policy in the region toward NTMs that are more transparent and trade enhancing for successful subsequent trade negotiations in the Indian Ocean Rim Association, which would support the sustainable economic development of the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdallah Akintola & Houcine Boughanmi & Alessandro Antimiani & Lokman Zaibet & Hemesiri Kotagama, 2021. "Estimating the Impacts of Non-Tariff Measures in the Indian Ocean Rim Association," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:68-:d:708283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/68/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/68/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne-Célia Disdier & Lionel Fontagné & Olivier Cadot, 2015. "North-South Standards Harmonization and International Trade," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 327-352.
    2. repec:hal:pseose:hal-00975529 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Anne-Célia Disdier & Lionel Fontagné & Olivier Cadot, 2015. "North-South Standards Harmonization and International Trade," World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 29(2), pages 327-352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siphat Lim, 2024. "The Impact of Non-Tariff Measures on the Exporting of Agricultural Products of Cambodia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 76-82, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fontagné, Lionel & Orefice, Gianluca, 2018. "Let’s try next door: Technical Barriers to Trade and multi-destination firms," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 643-663.
    2. Christian Elleby & Wusheng Yu & Qian Yu, 2018. "The Chinese Export Displacement Effect Revisited," IFRO Working Paper 2018/02, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    3. Timini, Jacopo & Viani, Francesca, 2022. "A highway across the Atlantic? Trade and welfare effects of the EU-Mercosur agreement," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 291-308.
    4. Fatima Olanike Kareem & Olayinka Idowu Kareem, 2021. "Employment Responses to EU Food Safety Regulations: A Gendered Perspective," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(6), pages 1899-1929, December.
    5. Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor & Insa Flachsbarth & Amjad Masood & Bernhard Brümmer, 2020. "Does GlobalGAP certification promote agrifood exports? [Standards as barriers versus standards as catalysts: assessing the impact of HACCP implementation on US seafood imports]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(1), pages 247-272.
    6. Jakob Engel & Deeksha Kokas & Gladys Lopez-Acevedo & Maryla Maliszewska, 2021. "The Distributional Impacts of Trade," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 35552.
    7. Staiger, Robert & Bagwell, Kyle & Bown, Chad, 2015. "Is the WTO Passé?," CEPR Discussion Papers 10672, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Lee, Woori & Mulabdic, Alen & Ruta, Michele, 2023. "Third-country effects of regional trade agreements: A firm-level analysis," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    9. Jaime DE MELO & Marcelo OLARREAGA, 2017. "Trade Related Institutions and Development," Working Papers P199, FERDI.
    10. Puruweti SIYAKIYA, 2017. "The Impact of Technical Regulations on Trade: Evidence from South Africa," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 64-75, March.
    11. Ruckteschler, Christian & Malik, Adeel & Eibl, Ferdinand, 2022. "Politics of trade protection in an autocracy: Evidence from an EU tariff liberalization in Morocco," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. John C. Beghin & Bo Xiong, 2016. "Economic Effects of Standard-Like Nontariff Measures: Analytical and Methodological Dimensions," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 16-wp569, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    13. Schmidt, Julia & Steingress, Walter, 2022. "No double standards: Quantifying the impact of standard harmonization on trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Santeramo, Fabio G., "undated". "On Non-Tariff Measures and Changes in Trade Routes: From North-North to South-South Trade?," 2017: Globalization Adrift, December 3-5, 2017, Washington, D.C. 266809, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    15. Ni, Shiying & Bai, Xiwen & Li, Lefei, 2022. "Behind the heterogeneous trade effects of standards: Multi-sector evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Kyle Bagwell & Chad P. Bown & Robert W. Staiger, 2016. "Is the WTO Passé?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1125-1231, December.
    17. Yuting Gao, 2022. "Measuring the Effects and Evolution of Non-tariff Measures," CAEPR Working Papers 2022-007 Classification-F, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    18. Siyakiya, Puruweti, 2017. "The impact of technical regulations on trade: Evidence from South Africa," MPRA Paper 76757, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Santeramo, Fabio, "undated". "Trade Effects of SPS Measures in Regional Trade Agreements," Commissioned Papers 304053, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Annalisa Zezza & Federica Demaria & Maria Rosaria Pupo d'Andrea & Jo Swinnen & Giulia Meloni & Senne Vandevelde & Alessandro Olper & Daniele Curzi & Valentina Raimondi & Sophie Drogue, 2018. "Research for AGRI Committee - Agricultural trade: assessing reciprocity of standards," Working Papers hal-02787948, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:68-:d:708283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.