IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4381-d536197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students’ Preferences and Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Vasile Gherheș

    (Department of Communication and Foreign Languages, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Claudia E. Stoian

    (Department of Communication and Foreign Languages, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Marcela Alina Fărcașiu

    (Department of Communication and Foreign Languages, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Miroslav Stanici

    (Department of Communication and Foreign Languages, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Educational life worldwide has been shaken by the closure of schools due to the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic. The ripple effects have been felt in the way both teachers and students have adapted to the constraints imposed by the new online form of education. The present study focuses exclusively on the beneficiaries of the educational process and aims to find out their perceptions of face-to-face and e-learning and their desire to return, or not, to the traditional form of education. These perceptions are represented by 604 students of the Politehnica University of Timisoara, who were asked to respond anonymously to an 8-question questionnaire between December 2020 and February 2021. The results show the respondents’ levels of desire to return to school (especially of those who have only benefited from e-learning) and their degree of involvement during online classes. The results also specify the advantages and disadvantages of the two forms of education from a double perspective, namely that of first-year students (beneficiaries of e-learning exclusively), and of upper-year students (beneficiaries of both face-to-face and e-learning). The study points out key information about e-learning from the students’ perspectives, which should be considered to understand the ongoing changes of the educational process and to solve its specific problems, thus ensuring its sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasile Gherheș & Claudia E. Stoian & Marcela Alina Fărcașiu & Miroslav Stanici, 2021. "E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students’ Preferences and Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4381-:d:536197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shim, Tae Eun & Lee, Song Yi, 2020. "College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Falih M. Alsaaty & Ella Carter & David Abrahams & Faleh Alshameri, 2016. "Traditional Versus Online Learning in Institutions of Higher Education: Minority Business Students¡¯ Perceptions," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 31-41, June.
    3. Eduard Edelhauser & Lucian Lupu-Dima, 2020. "Is Romania Prepared for eLearning during the COVID-19 Pandemic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Claudiu Coman & Laurențiu Gabriel Țîru & Luiza Meseșan-Schmitz & Carmen Stanciu & Maria Cristina Bularca, 2020. "Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Hasan, Najmul & Bao, Yukun, 2020. "Impact of “e-Learning crack-up” perception on psychological distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of “fear of academic year loss”," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Liliana Paschia & Nicoleta Luminita Gudanescu Nicolau & Sorina Geanina Stanescu & Veronica Maria Neacsu Stancescu & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Marilena Carmen Uzlau, 2020. "Sustainability Analysis of the E-Learning Education System during Pandemic Period—COVID-19 in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Ciprian Obrad, 2020. "Constraints and Consequences of Online Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Vasile Gherheș & Simona Șimon & Iulia Para, 2021. "Analysing Students’ Reasons for Keeping Their Webcams on or off during Online Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu-Hsuan Chen, 2021. "Sustainable Education through E-Learning: The Case Study of iLearn2.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Ciprian Obrad & Cristina Circa, 2021. "Determinants of Work Engagement Among Teachers in the Context of Teleworking," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 718-718, August.
    3. Tabea Bork-Hüffer & Vanessa Kulcar & Ferdinand Brielmair & Andrea Markl & Daniel Marian Immer & Barbara Juen & Maria Hildegard Walter & Katja Kaufmann, 2021. "University Students’ Perception, Evaluation, and Spaces of Distance Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Austria: What Can We Learn for Post-Pandemic Educational Futures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Eduard Edelhauser & Lucian Lupu-Dima, 2021. "One Year of Online Education in COVID-19 Age, a Challenge for the Romanian Education System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-32, July.
    5. Vasile Gherheș & Simona Șimon & Iulia Para, 2021. "Analysing Students’ Reasons for Keeping Their Webcams on or off during Online Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Ford, Timothy G. & Kwon, Kyong-Ah & Tsotsoros, Jessica D., 2021. "Early childhood distance learning in the U.S. during the COVID pandemic: Challenges and opportunities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Gabriel-Mugurel Dragomir, 2021. "Romanian Students’ Appraisal of the Emergency Remote Assessment due to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Jordan Klimek & Julia Anna Klimek, 2021. "Management of the Teaching Process in Higher Education in COVID-19 Pandemic: Socio-Cultural and Economic Aspects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 737-752.
    9. Andreea Barbu & Mirona Ana Maria Popescu & Georgiana Moiceanu, 2022. "Perspective of Teachers and Students towards the Education Process during COVID-19 in Romanian Universities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Montserrat Santamaría-Vázquez & Mario Del Líbano & Iratxe Martínez-Lezaun & Juan Hilario Ortiz-Huerta, 2021. "Self-Regulation of Motivation and Confinement by COVID-19: A Study in Spanish University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Jongseok Ahn, 2020. "Unequal Loneliness in the Digitalized Classroom: Two Loneliness Effects of School Computers and Lessons for Sustainable Education in the E-Learning Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Roman, Monica & Plopeanu, Aurelian-Petruș, 2021. "The effectiveness of the emergency eLearning during COVID-19 pandemic. The case of higher education in economics in Romania," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    13. Irdina Farzana Ahmad Shazli & Noor Hidayah Che Lah & Mashitoh Hashim & Ramlah Mailok & Aslina Saad & Suraya Hamid, 2023. "A Comprehensive Study of Students’ Challenges and Perceptions of Emergency Remote Education During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    14. Cristina Cîrtiță-Buzoianu & Katerina Tzafilkou & Liliana Mâță & Brîndușa-Mariana Amălăncei, 2022. "Evaluation of Online and Offline Communication Skills in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Mădălin-Dorin Pop & Adrian Pavel Pugna & Vladimir-Ioan Crețu & Sabina Alina Potra, 2022. "Two Years of Hybrid Education in Romania: A Comparative Overview of the Students’ Expectations for the Online Educational Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Konrad Kulikowski & Sylwia Przytuła & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2021. "The Motivation of Academics in Remote Teaching during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Polish Universities—Opening the Debate on a New Equilibrium in e-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Mustofa, Rochman Hadi & Pramudita, Dias Aziz & Atmono, Dwi & Priyankara, Rasika & Asmawan, Mochammad Chairil & Rahmattullah, Muhammad & Mudrikah, Saringatun & Pamungkas, Leonny Noviyana Sakti, 2022. "Exploring educational students acceptance of using movies as economics learning media: PLS-SEM analysis," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    18. Ionica Oncioiu & Ioana Duca & Mirela Anca Postole & Georgiana Camelia Georgescu (Crețan) & Rodica Gherghina & Robert-Adrian Grecu, 2021. "Transforming the COVID-19 Threat into an Opportunity: The Pandemic as a Stage to the Sustainable Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Tomasz Wieczorek & Agata Kołodziejczyk & Marta Ciułkowicz & Julian Maciaszek & Błażej Misiak & Joanna Rymaszewska & Dorota Szcześniak, 2021. "Class of 2020 in Poland: Students’ Mental Health during the COVID-19 Outbreak in an Academic Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Huang, Duen-Huang & Chueh, Hao-En, 2022. "Behavioral intention to continuously use learning apps: A comparative study from Taiwan universities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4381-:d:536197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.