IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4255-d534333.html

Investigation of Mixing Behavior of Hydrogen Blended to Natural Gas in Gas Network

Author

Listed:
  • Mingmin Kong

    (Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China)

  • Shuaiming Feng

    (Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China)

  • Qi Xia

    (Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China)

  • Chen Chen

    (Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China)

  • Zhouxin Pan

    (Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China)

  • Zengliang Gao

    (Institute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China)

Abstract

Hydrogen is of great significance for replacing fossil fuels and reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The application of hydrogen mixing with natural gas in gas network transportation not only improves the utilization rate of hydrogen energy, but also reduces the cost of large-scale updating household or commercial appliance. This paper investigates the necessity of a gas mixing device for adding hydrogen to existing natural gas pipelines in the industrial gas network. A three-dimensional helical static mixer model is developed to simulate the mixing behavior of the gas mixture. In addition, the model is validated with experimental results. Parametric studies are performed to investigate the effect of mixer on the mixing performance including the coefficient of variation ( COV ) and pressure loss. The research results show that, based on the, the optimum number of mixing units is three. The arrangement of the torsion angle of the mixing unit has a greater impact on the COV . When the torsion angle θ = 120°, the COV has a minimum value of 0.66%, and when the torsion angle θ = 60°, the COV has a maximum value of 8.54%. The distance of the mixing unit has little effect on the pressure loss of the mixed gas but has a greater impact on the COV . Consecutive arrangement of the mixing units (Case A) is the best solution. Increasing the distance of the mixing unit is not effective for the gas mixing effect. Last but not least, the gas mixer is optimized to improve the mixing performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingmin Kong & Shuaiming Feng & Qi Xia & Chen Chen & Zhouxin Pan & Zengliang Gao, 2021. "Investigation of Mixing Behavior of Hydrogen Blended to Natural Gas in Gas Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4255-:d:534333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Vries, Harmen & Levinsky, Howard B., 2020. "Flashback, burning velocities and hydrogen admixture: Domestic appliance approval, gas regulation and appliance development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2020. "Should we inject hydrogen into gas grids? Practicalities and whole-system value chain optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Ogden, Joan & Jaffe, Amy Myers & Scheitrum, Daniel & McDonald, Zane & Miller, Marshall, 2018. "Natural gas as a bridge to hydrogen transportation fuel: Insights from the literature," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 317-329.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ye, Jianan & Xie, Min & Zhang, Shiping & Huang, Ying & Liu, Mingbo & Wang, Qiong, 2023. "Stochastic optimal scheduling of electricity–hydrogen enriched compressed natural gas urban integrated energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1024-1044.
    2. Iren A. Makaryan & Igor V. Sedov & Eugene A. Salgansky & Artem V. Arutyunov & Vladimir S. Arutyunov, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on the Prospects of Using Hydrogen–Methane Blends: Challenges and Opportunities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Adrian Neacsa & Cristian Nicolae Eparu & Cașen Panaitescu & Doru Bogdan Stoica & Bogdan Ionete & Alina Prundurel & Sorin Gal, 2023. "Hydrogen–Natural Gas Mix—A Viable Perspective for Environment and Society," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-38, August.
    4. Devinder Mahajan & Kun Tan & T. Venkatesh & Pradheep Kileti & Clive R. Clayton, 2022. "Hydrogen Blending in Gas Pipeline Networks—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-32, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Socio-technical barriers to domestic hydrogen futures: Repurposing pipelines, policies, and public perceptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    2. Alexandros Kafetzis & Michael Bampaou & Giorgos Kardaras & Kyriakos Panopoulos, 2023. "Decarbonization of Former Lignite Regions with Renewable Hydrogen: The Western Macedonia Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Danieli, Piero & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Al-Zaili, Jafar & Sayma, Abdulnaser & Masi, Massimo & Carraro, Gianluca, 2022. "The potential of the natural gas grid to accommodate hydrogen as an energy vector in transition towards a fully renewable energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    4. Davis, M. & Okunlola, A. & Di Lullo, G. & Giwa, T. & Kumar, A., 2023. "Greenhouse gas reduction potential and cost-effectiveness of economy-wide hydrogen-natural gas blending for energy end uses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Johannes Full & Silja Hohmann & Sonja Ziehn & Edgar Gamero & Tobias Schließ & Hans-Peter Schmid & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2023. "Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Navas-Anguita, Zaira & García-Gusano, Diego & Iribarren, Diego, 2019. "A review of techno-economic data for road transportation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 11-26.
    7. Tianlei Li & Jie Xiao & Honglin Zhang & Jinliang Cheng & Ke Li & Yaxi Wang & Yuanhua Lin, 2025. "Numerical Simulation Study of Gas Stratification in Hydrogen-Enriched Natural Gas Pipelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Freida Ozavize Ayodele & Siti Indati Mustapa & Bamidele Victor Ayodele & Norsyahida Mohammad, 2020. "An Overview of Economic Analysis and Environmental Impacts of Natural Gas Conversion Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Silvestre, Inês & Pastor, Ricardo & Neto, Rui Costa, 2023. "Power losses in natural gas and hydrogen transmission in the Portuguese high-pressure network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Oner, Oytun & Khalilpour, Kaveh, 2022. "Evaluation of green hydrogen carriers: A multi-criteria decision analysis tool," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Sanjay Kumar Kar & Akhoury Sudhir Kumar Sinha & Sidhartha Harichandan & Rohit Bansal & Marriyappan Sivagnanam Balathanigaimani, 2023. "Hydrogen economy in India: A status review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), January.
    12. Park, Yeseul & Choi, Minsung & Choi, Gyungmin, 2023. "Thermodynamic performance study of large-scale industrial gas turbine with methane/ammonia/hydrogen blended fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    13. Juliet Namukasa & Sheila Namagembe & Faridah Nakayima, 2020. "Fuel Efficiency Vehicle Adoption and Carbon Emissions in a Country Context," International Journal of Global Sustainability, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Carlo Cunanan & Manh-Kien Tran & Youngwoo Lee & Shinghei Kwok & Vincent Leung & Michael Fowler, 2021. "A Review of Heavy-Duty Vehicle Powertrain Technologies: Diesel Engine Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Bødal, Espen Flo & Holm, Sigmund Eggen & Subramanian, Avinash & Durakovic, Goran & Pinel, Dimitri & Hellemo, Lars & Ortiz, Miguel Muñoz & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Straus, Julian, 2024. "Hydrogen for harvesting the potential of offshore wind: A North Sea case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    16. Oduro, Richard A. & Taylor, Peter G., 2023. "Future pathways for energy networks: A review of international experiences in high income countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Usman, Muhammad R., 2022. "Hydrogen storage methods: Review and current status," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Park, Yeseul & Choi, Minsung & Kim, Dongmin & Lee, Joongsung & Choi, Gyungmin, 2021. "Performance analysis of large-scale industrial gas turbine considering stable combustor operation using novel blended fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    19. Hunt, Julian David & Nascimento, Andreas & Nascimento, Nazem & Vieira, Lara Werncke & Romero, Oldrich Joel, 2022. "Possible pathways for oil and gas companies in a sustainable future: From the perspective of a hydrogen economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Hren, Robert & Vujanović, Annamaria & Van Fan, Yee & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Krajnc, Damjan & Čuček, Lidija, 2023. "Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4255-:d:534333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.