IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4168-d532484.html

Potential Analysis of Mediterranean Forestry for Offsetting GHG Emissions at Regional Level: Evidence from Valencia, Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Edgar Lorenzo-Sáez

    (Information and Communication Technologies vs Climate Change Research Group, Campus de Vera, ITACA Research Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Jose-Vicente Oliver-Villanueva

    (Information and Communication Technologies vs Climate Change Research Group, Campus de Vera, ITACA Research Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Victoria Lerma-Arce

    (Information and Communication Technologies vs Climate Change Research Group, Campus de Vera, ITACA Research Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Celia Yagüe-Hurtado

    (Information and Communication Technologies vs Climate Change Research Group, Campus de Vera, ITACA Research Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Lenin Guillermo Lemus-Zúñiga

    (Information and Communication Technologies vs Climate Change Research Group, Campus de Vera, ITACA Research Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

Forest management is an untapped tool, yet to realize its full potential to fight against climate change. The capability of forests to act as carbon sinks makes them a key resource to reduce CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere. However, carbon which has been fixed can be suddenly emitted again as a consequence of disturbances such as pests or wildfires. Mediterranean plant phenology, climatic conditions, and the accumulation of fuel biomass due to abandonment of traditional forest uses generate a scenario prone to large wildfires and consequently large greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. The abandonment could be offset by considering the economic value of forest ecosystem services, principally carbon fixation. Nevertheless, currently existing forest carbon markets consider only anthropogenic fixation based on a business as usual scenario without disturbances that cannot be applied to Mediterranean forest reality. Thus, a methodology to monetize carbon fixed has been developed and applied. A range between 55.5 and 250 million € produced by the monetization of 16.5 million potential carbon credits has been obtained based on anthropogenic avoided emissions produced over a 10 year-period. Thereby, the potential for offsetting emissions of the pilot region was between 1.2% and 5.6% of total diffuse GHG emissions. Consequently, sustainable forest management represents an important opportunity to combat climate change, taking advantage of the margin of improvement that the Mediterranean forests currently have to avoid GHG emissions through forest fire prevention silviculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar Lorenzo-Sáez & Jose-Vicente Oliver-Villanueva & Victoria Lerma-Arce & Celia Yagüe-Hurtado & Lenin Guillermo Lemus-Zúñiga, 2021. "Potential Analysis of Mediterranean Forestry for Offsetting GHG Emissions at Regional Level: Evidence from Valencia, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4168-:d:532484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Vine & Jayant Sathaye, 1999. "The Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting and Verification of Climate Change Projects," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 43-60, March.
    2. Binkley, Clark S. & Brand, David & Harkin, Zoe & Bull, Gary & Ravindranath, N. H. & Obersteiner, Michael & Nilsson, Sten & Yamagata, Yoshiki & Krott, Max, 2002. "Carbon sink by the forest sector--options and needs for implementation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 65-77, May.
    3. Ingrid Vigna & Angelo Besana & Elena Comino & Alessandro Pezzoli, 2021. "Application of the Socio-Ecological System Framework to Forest Fire Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Croitoru, Lelia, 2007. "How much are Mediterranean forests worth?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(5), pages 536-545, January.
    5. Köhl, Michael & Neupane, Prem Raj & Mundhenk, Philip, 2020. "REDD+ measurement, reporting and verification – A cost trap? Implications for financing REDD+MRV costs by result-based payments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Susete Marques & Marco Marto & Vladimir Bushenkov & Marc McDill & JoséG. Borges, 2017. "Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Tony Prato, 2015. "Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Forest Fuel Reduction Treatments and Their Adaptation to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Lanhui Wang & Zichan Cui & Jari Kuuluvainen & Yongyu Sun, 2021. "Does Forest Industries in China Become Cleaner? A Prospective of Embodied Carbon Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maddison Seeley & Hamish Hede & Mitchell Bylart & John Rodwell, 2023. "Diagnosing the Institutional Forces Impacting Australia’s Aerial Firefighting Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Raquel Fernández-González & Félix Puime Guillén & Otilia Manta & Simona Andreea Apostu & Valentina Vasile, 2022. "Forest Management Communities’ Participation in Bioenergy Production Initiatives: A Case Study for Galicia (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Alexandrovich Golub & Marek Hanusch & Bardal,Diogo & Bruce Ian Keith & Daniel Navia Simon & Cornelius Fleischhaker, 2025. "Innovative Financial Instruments and Their Role in the Development of Jurisdictional REDD+," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11114, The World Bank.
    2. Qian, Dong & Guo, Ju’e, 2014. "Research on the energy-saving and revenue sharing strategy of ESCOs under the uncertainty of the value of Energy Performance Contracting Projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 710-721.
    3. Gao, Yuan & Yu, Lu, 2024. "Understanding the impacts of ecological compensation policies on energy poverty: insights from forest communities in Zhejiang, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Huiru Zhao & Nana Li, 2016. "Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Guangyue Xu & Peter Schwarz & Xiaojing Shi & Nathan Duma, 2023. "Scenario Paths of Developing Forest Carbon Sinks for China to Achieve Carbon Neutrality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Paolo Vassallo & Claudia Turcato & Ilaria Rigo & Claudia Scopesi & Andrea Costa & Matteo Barcella & Giulia Dapueto & Mauro Mariotti & Chiara Paoli, 2021. "Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs. Exploitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Häyhä, Tiina & Franzese, Pier Paolo & Paletto, Alessandro & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 12-23.
    8. Enrico Cozzoni & Carmine Passavanti & Cristina Ponsiglione & Simonetta Primario & Pierluigi Rippa, 2021. "Interorganizational Collaboration in Innovation Networks: An Agent Based Model for Responsible Research and Innovation in Additive Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Oscar Cacho & Russell Wise & Kenneth MacDicken, 2004. "Carbon Monitoring Costs and their Effect on Incentives to Sequester Carbon through Forestry," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 273-293, July.
    10. Labarre, Clémence & Domec, Jean-Christophe & Andrés-Domenech, Pablo & Bödeker, Kai & Bingham, Logan & Loustau, Denis, 2025. "Improving forest decision-making through complex system representation: A viability theory perspective," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. van Beeck, Nicole & Doukas, Haris & Gioria, Michel & Karakosta, Charikleia & Psarras, John, 2009. "Energy RTD expenditures in the European union: Data gathering procedures and results towards a scientific reference system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 452-459, April.
    12. Carin Labuschagne & Alan C. Brent & Schalk J. Claasen, 2005. "Environmental and social impact considerations for sustainable project life cycle management in the process industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 38-54, March.
    13. Cori, Viola Di & Robert, Nicolas & Mainar-Causapé, Alfredo José & Franceschinis, Cristiano & Pettenella, Davide Matteo & Thiene, Mara, 2025. "Revealing the hidden socioeconomic role of wild forest products for the European bioeconomy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Marlene Marques & Keith M. Reynolds & Susete Marques & Marco Marto & Steve Paplanus & José G. Borges, 2021. "A Participatory and Spatial Multicriteria Decision Approach to Prioritize the Allocation of Ecosystem Services to Management Units," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    15. C. Wade Ross & E. Louise Loudermilk & Steven A. Flanagan & Grant Snitker & J. Kevin Hiers & Joseph J. O’Brien, 2025. "Wildfire Severity Reduction Through Prescribed Burning in the Southeastern United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Demirbugan, Alper, 2019. "Changes in ecosystem service benefit in Soma lignite region of Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Górriz-Mifsud, Elena & Varela, Elsa & Piqué, Míriam & Prokofieva, Irina, 2016. "Demand and supply of ecosystem services in a Mediterranean forest: Computing payment boundaries," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 53-63.
    18. Fotakis, Dimitris G. & Sidiropoulos, Epameinondas & Myronidis, Dimitriοs & Ioannou, Kostas, 2012. "Spatial genetic algorithm for multi-objective forest planning," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 12-19.
    19. Bartczak, Anna & Lindhjem, Henrik & Navrud, Ståle & Zandersen, Marianne & Zylicz, Tomasz, 2008. "Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(7-8), pages 467-472, October.
    20. Z. Harkin & G. Bull, 2000. "Towards Developing a Comprehensive Carbon Accounting Framework for Forests in British Columbia," Working Papers ir00046, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4168-:d:532484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.