IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1636-d1036019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnosing the Institutional Forces Impacting Australia’s Aerial Firefighting Capability

Author

Listed:
  • Maddison Seeley

    (Department of Aviation, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

  • Hamish Hede

    (Department of Aviation, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

  • Mitchell Bylart

    (Department of Aviation, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

  • John Rodwell

    (Department of Management & Marketing, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

Abstract

Climate change is resulting in more wildfires, and increasingly, there are overlapping wildfire seasons between the northern and southern hemispheres. The changing climate is especially impacting the nature of aerial firefighting. This study uses an institutional lens to analyse the resources and structures associated with aerial firefighting in Australia. A set of convergent interviews of subject matter experts surfaced the key issues that have led to the current aerial firefighting situation in Australia and showed the relationships between issues. The convergent interviewing method is used to identify the core, common issues that influence the aerial firefighting system in Australia. The results highlight how aerial firefighting suffers due to the complexities that exist between the states and from a lack of a national strategy. A lack of process standardisation, an overreliance on, often international, LATs and the lack of a coordinated mitigation approach are particularly notable specific issues. Institutional theory suggests that Australia’s aerial firefighting capability has succumbed to isomorphic pressures, with the desire for legitimacy driving ever-increasing institutionalization. To respond to the changing environment, institutional entrepreneurs will be needed to create new norms and significantly change the embedded structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Maddison Seeley & Hamish Hede & Mitchell Bylart & John Rodwell, 2023. "Diagnosing the Institutional Forces Impacting Australia’s Aerial Firefighting Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1636-:d:1036019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharon L. Campbell & Carina C. Anderson & Amanda J. Wheeler & Stephen Cook & Tim Muster & Fay H. Johnston, 2022. "Managing Extreme Heat and Smoke: A Focus Group Study of Vulnerable People in Darwin, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Dimitra Angra & Kalliopi Sapountzaki, 2022. "Climate Change Affecting Forest Fire and Flood Risk—Facts, Predictions, and Perceptions in Central and South Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Augusto Zanin Bertoletti & Theresa Phan & Josue Campos do Prado, 2022. "Wildfire Smoke, Air Quality, and Renewable Energy—Examining the Impacts of the 2020 Wildfire Season in Washington State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Kurt Chamberlain & Bethanie Storey & Jayden Brown & Scott Rayburg & John Rodwell & Melissa Neave, 2022. "Cleaning up Forever Chemicals in Construction: Informing Industry Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Lara Thynne & John Rodwell, 2019. "Diagnostic Convergent Interviewing to Inform Redesign Toward Sustainable Work Systems for Paramedics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Edgar Lorenzo-Sáez & Jose-Vicente Oliver-Villanueva & Victoria Lerma-Arce & Celia Yagüe-Hurtado & Lenin Guillermo Lemus-Zúñiga, 2021. "Potential Analysis of Mediterranean Forestry for Offsetting GHG Emissions at Regional Level: Evidence from Valencia, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Halldorsson, Arni & Aastrup, Jesper, 2003. "Quality criteria for qualitative inquiries in logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 321-332, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dekkers, Rob & de Boer, Ronald & Gelsomino, Luca Mattia & de Goeij, Christiaan & Steeman, Michiel & Zhou, Qijun & Sinclair, Scott & Souter, Victoria, 2020. "Evaluating theoretical conceptualisations for supply chain and finance integration: A Scottish focus group," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Hong Wen Yu & S. Y. Simon Wang & Wan Yu Liu, 2024. "Estimating wildfire potential in Taiwan under different climate change scenarios," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Vural, Ceren Altuntaş & Göçer, Aysu & Halldórsson, Árni, 2019. "Value co-creation in maritime logistics networks: A service triad perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 27-39.
    4. Firre An Suprapto & Bambang Juanda & Ernan Rustiadi & Khursatul Munibah, 2022. "Study of Disaster Susceptibility and Economic Vulnerability to Strengthen Disaster Risk Reduction Instruments in Batu City, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Kurt Chamberlain & Bethanie Storey & Jayden Brown & Scott Rayburg & John Rodwell & Melissa Neave, 2022. "Cleaning up Forever Chemicals in Construction: Informing Industry Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Kelsey M. Taylor & Eugenia Rosca, 2023. "Sink, swim, or drift: How social enterprises use supply chain social capital to balance tensions between impact and viability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(2), pages 62-86, April.
    7. Svanberg, Martin & Finnsgård, Christian & Flodén, Jonas & Lundgren, Joakim, 2018. "Analyzing animal waste-to-energy supply chains: The case of horse manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 830-837.
    8. Jessica Wehner, 2018. "Energy Efficiency in Logistics: An Interactive Approach to Capacity Utilisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Sophie Fischer & John Rodwell & Mark Pickering, 2021. "A Configurational Approach to Mergers and Acquisitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Vanajah Siva & Ida Gremyr & Árni Halldórsson, 2018. "Organising Sustainability Competencies through Quality Management: Integration or Specialisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Rittichainuwat, Bongkosh & Rattanaphinanchai, Suphaporn, 2015. "Applying a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative design in explaining the travel motivation of film tourists in visiting a film-shooting destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 136-147.
    12. Raquel Fernández-González & Félix Puime Guillén & Otilia Manta & Simona Andreea Apostu & Valentina Vasile, 2022. "Forest Management Communities’ Participation in Bioenergy Production Initiatives: A Case Study for Galicia (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Yasmim Maia Pederneiras & Johann Meckenstock & Ana Isabel Cerqueira Carvalho & Ana Paula Barbosa‐Póvoa, 2022. "The wicked problem of sustainable development in supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 46-58, January.
    14. Purvis, Laura & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2014. "The development of a lean, agile and leagile supply network taxonomy based on differing types of flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 100-111.
    15. Raja, Jawwad Z. & Frandsen, Thomas & Kowalkowski, Christian & Jarmatz, Martin, 2020. "Learning to discover value: Value-based pricing and selling capabilities for services and solutions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 142-159.
    16. Hossein Baharmand & Diego Vega & Matthieu Lauras & Tina Comes, 2022. "A methodology for developing evidence-based optimization models in humanitarian logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1197-1229, December.
    17. Mahroof, Kamran, 2019. "A human-centric perspective exploring the readiness towards smart warehousing: The case of a large retail distribution warehouse," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 176-190.
    18. Sears, Sean & Moataz, Mohamed & Ferguson, Mark & Razavi, Saiedeh & Páez, Antonio, 2022. "Perceived barriers to the movement of goods in Canada: A grounded theory investigation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 27-45.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1636-:d:1036019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.