IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1705-d493798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of Lithium Application and Effect of Organic Matter on Soil Health

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Umar Hayyat

    (Sustainable Development Study Centre, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Rab Nawaz

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Zafar Siddiq

    (Department of Botany, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Bilal Shakoor

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Maira Mushtaq

    (Sustainable Development Study Centre, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Sajid Rashid Ahmad

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Shafaqat Ali

    (Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    Department of Biological Sciences and Technology, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan)

  • Afzal Hussain

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Atif Irshad

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Abdulaziz Abdullah Alsahli

    (Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Nasser Alyemeni

    (Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The extensive use of lithium (Li) ion-based batteries has increased the contamination of soil and water systems due to widespread dispersal of Li products in the environment. In the current study, the influence of Li application on soil fertility and leachate was observed. Three soil samples were collected and five treatments of Li (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg/L) were applied. After three months of Li treatment, leachate was collected and soil samples were subjected to physical and chemical analyses. The results showed that the mean values of soil pH were increased slightly after Li application while electrical conductivity (EC) ranged from 1.2 to 5.1 µS/cm, indicating that soil was slightly saline in nature. The sodium was observed to be greater than the recommended values (0.3–0.7 mg/kg) in Li-amended soil while calcium and magnesium values decreased in soils compared to untreated soil. Mean values of phosphorus and potassium were greater before Li application and reduced considerably after Li application. Leachate analysis showed that all the parameters differed significantly except those of zinc and iron. The EC of leachate samples ranged from 2286–7188 µS/cm, which shows strong salinity. The sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) ranged from 1–11, which indicates that it falls into the marginal soil category. Lithium concentration in leachate samples ranged from 0–95 mg/L, which was significantly higher than the acceptable value for lithium (2.5 mg/L) in leachate. A soil sample (3) with an additional 10% organic matter showed that after Li application, the loss of nutrients in leachate was less as compared to the other two samples, demonstrating that organic matter improved soil conditions and suppressed the negative effects of Li on soil. Our results could raise concerns about risks in situations where food and fodder crops are associated with Li-contaminated waste disposal.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Umar Hayyat & Rab Nawaz & Zafar Siddiq & Muhammad Bilal Shakoor & Maira Mushtaq & Sajid Rashid Ahmad & Shafaqat Ali & Afzal Hussain & Muhammad Atif Irshad & Abdulaziz Abdullah Alsahli & Moham, 2021. "Investigation of Lithium Application and Effect of Organic Matter on Soil Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1705-:d:493798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1705/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1705/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boelens, Rutgerd & Vos, Jeroen, 2012. "The danger of naturalizing water policy concepts: Water productivity and efficiency discourses from field irrigation to virtual water trade," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 16-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nazemi, Neda & Foley, Rider W. & Louis, Garrick & Keeler, Lauren Withycombe, 2020. "Divergent agricultural water governance scenarios: The case of Zayanderud basin, Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Jeroen Vos & Rutgerd Boelens, 2014. "Sustainability Standards and the Water Question," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(2), pages 205-230, March.
    3. Lankford, Bruce, 2012. "Fictions, fractions, factorials and fractures; on the framing of irrigation efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 27-38.
    4. McDonald, David A., 2016. "To corporatize or not to corporatize (and if so, how?)," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 107-114.
    5. Fernández, J.E. & Alcon, F. & Diaz-Espejo, A. & Hernandez-Santana, V. & Cuevas, M.V., 2020. "Water use indicators and economic analysis for on-farm irrigation decision: A case study of a super high density olive tree orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Wenge, 2022. "Water-use technical efficiency and income: Evidence from China's South-North Water Transfer Project," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Charles Sims & Sarah E. Null & Josue Medellin-Azuara & Augustina Odame, 2021. "Hurry Up Or Wait: Are Private Investments In Climate Change Adaptation Delayed?," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(04), pages 1-36, November.
    8. Cao, Xinchun & Cui, Simeng & Shu, Rui & Wu, Mengyang, 2020. "Misestimation of water saving in agricultural virtual water trade by not considering the role of irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Fracasso, Andrea, 2014. "A gravity model of virtual water trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 215-228.
    10. Esha Shah & Janwillem Liebrand & Jeroen Vos & Gert Jan Veldwisch & Rutgerd Boelens, 2018. "The UN World Water Development Report 2016, Water and Jobs: A Critical Review," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 678-691, March.
    11. Guofeng Wang & Nan Lin & Xiaoxue Zhou & Zhihui Li & Xiangzheng Deng, 2018. "Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis of Agricultural Water Use Efficiency: A Case Study of the Heihe River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Rodríguez-de-Francisco, J.C. & Budds, J., 2015. "Payments for environmental services and control over conservation of natural resources: The role of public and private sectors in the conservation of the Nima watershed, Colombia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 295-302.
    13. Jeroen Warner, 2015. "South-South cooperation: Brazilian soy diplomacy looking East?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(6), pages 1175-1185, December.
    14. van der Kooij, Saskia & Zwarteveen, Margreet & Boesveld, Harm & Kuper, Marcel, 2013. "The efficiency of drip irrigation unpacked," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 103-110.
    15. Arnald Puy & Razi Sheikholeslami & Hoshin V. Gupta & Jim W. Hall & Bruce Lankford & Samuele Lo Piano & Jonas Meier & Florian Pappenberger & Amilcare Porporato & Giulia Vico & Andrea Saltelli, 2022. "The delusive accuracy of global irrigation water withdrawal estimates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, December.
    16. Joaquin Romano & Byron V. Coral, 2020. "Public Management, Private Management and Collective Action in the Portoviejo River Basin: Visions and Conflicts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Liu, Lining & Zuo, Qiang & Shi, Jianchu & Wu, Xun & Wei, Congmin & Sheng, Jiandong & Jiang, Pingan & Chen, Quanjia & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2023. "Balancing economic benefits and environmental repercussions based on smart irrigation by regulating root zone water and salinity dynamics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    18. Alonso, A. & Feltz, N. & Gaspart, F. & Sbaa, M. & Vanclooster, M., 2019. "Comparative assessment of irrigation systems’ performance: Case study in the Triffa agricultural district, NE Morocco," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 338-348.
    19. Gao, Chen & Bracken, Gregory & Herdt, Tanja, 2023. "Balancing water rights in metropolitan water conservation areas: the case of Chengdu, China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-20.
    20. England, Matthew I., 2019. "Contested waterscapes: Irrigation and hydropower in the Great Ruaha River Basin, Tanzania," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1084-1095.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1705-:d:493798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.