IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13342-d693360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underlying Factors of Tourist Social Responsibility (TSR) within the COVID-19 Context: An Empirical Investigation of the Saudi Tourism Market

Author

Listed:
  • Ayman Kassem

    (Department of Tourism and Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, Hail University, Hail 81411, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahmad Muhammad Ragab

    (Tourism Studies Department, Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Minia University, El Minia 61519, Egypt)

  • Abdullah Alomran

    (Department of Tourism and Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, Hail University, Hail 81411, Saudi Arabia)

  • Eid Alotaibi

    (Department of Tourism and Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, Hail University, Hail 81411, Saudi Arabia)

  • Tarek AbdelAzim Ahmed

    (Department of Tourism and Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, Hail University, Hail 81411, Saudi Arabia)

  • Eman Shaker

    (Tourism Studies Department, Higher Institute of Tourism and Hotels in King Mariout, Alexandria 23713, Egypt)

  • Abdallah Alajloni

    (Department of Tourism and Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, Hail University, Hail 81411, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The current literature on social responsibility in tourism is criticized for its bias in focusing on business ethics and responsibility while neglecting the tourist perspective. This paper aims to fill this gap by exploring the underlying factors of tourist social responsibility (TSR) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the Saudi tourism market. Based on the common scale development procedures, including a thorough review of the literature, identifying TSR domains and items, purifying the measurement scale, and demonstrating its reliability, a five-dimensional 24-item scale is developed. The findings reveal that TSR can be measured based on five distinct factors: (1) “Responsibility for legal and social aspects”, (2) “Responsibility for COVID-19 health issues”, (3) “Responsibility for altruism and solidarity”, (4) “Responsibility for supporting socially responsible businesses”, and (5) “Responsibility for environmental impacts”. Moreover, the results confirm the significant relationship between TSR attitude and tourists’ intention to behave socially. These findings enable policymakers to understand the TSR notion and factors influencing tourists to be more socially responsible during and after the COVID-19 pandemic to realize a more resilient and sustainable tourism sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayman Kassem & Ahmad Muhammad Ragab & Abdullah Alomran & Eid Alotaibi & Tarek AbdelAzim Ahmed & Eman Shaker & Abdallah Alajloni, 2021. "Underlying Factors of Tourist Social Responsibility (TSR) within the COVID-19 Context: An Empirical Investigation of the Saudi Tourism Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13342-:d:693360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13342/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13342/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mbaye Fall Diallo & Fatou Diop-Sall & Erick Leroux & Pierre Valette-Florence, 2015. "Responsible tourist behaviour : The role of social engagement," Post-Print hal-01998024, HAL.
    2. He, Hongwei & Harris, Lloyd, 2020. "The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 176-182.
    3. Lee, Choong-Ki & Song, Hak-Jun & Bendle, Lawrence J. & Kim, Myung-Ja & Han, Heesup, 2012. "The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for 2009 H1N1 influenza on travel intentions: A model of goal-directed behavior," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 89-99.
    4. Michael Hopkins, 2005. "Measurement of corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 213-231.
    5. Adaeze Okoye, 2009. "Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 613-627, November.
    6. Mara Manente & Valeria Minghetti & Erica Mingotto, 2014. "Responsible Tourism and CSR," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-06308-9, May.
    7. MARQUES SANTOS Anabela & MADRID Carmen & HAEGEMAN Karel & RAINOLDI Alessandro, 2020. "Behavioural changes in tourism in times of Covid-19: Employment scenarios and policy options," JRC Research Reports JRC121262, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Juvan, Emil & Dolnicar, Sara, 2014. "The attitude–behaviour gap in sustainable tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 76-95.
    9. Denni I. Arli & Fandy Tjiptono, 2018. "Consumer ethics, religiosity, and consumer social responsibility: are they related?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 302-320, June.
    10. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Lee, Tsung Hung & Jan, Fen-Hauh & Yang, Chung-Cheng, 2013. "Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 454-468.
    12. Álvaro Dias & Inês Aldana & Leandro Pereira & Renato Lopes da Costa & Nelson António, 2021. "A Measure of Tourist Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Michael Maloni & Michael Brown, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 35-52, September.
    14. Martina Paskova & Josef Zelenka, 2018. "How crucial is the social responsibility for tourism sustainability?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 534-552, October.
    15. Terlau, Wiltrud & Hirsch, Darya, 2015. "Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206233, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    16. Hultman, Magnus & Kazeminia, Azadeh & Ghasemi, Vahid, 2015. "Intention to visit and willingness to pay premium for ecotourism: The impact of attitude, materialism, and motivation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1854-1861.
    17. Park, Hyun Jung & Lin, Li Min, 2020. "Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 623-628.
    18. Michael P. Schlaile & Katharina Klein & Wolfgang Böck, 2018. "From Bounded Morality to Consumer Social Responsibility: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Socially Responsible Consumption and Its Obstacles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 561-588, May.
    19. Robert Caruana & Andreas Chatzidakis, 2014. "Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSR): Toward a Multi-Level, Multi-Agent Conceptualization of the “Other CSR”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 577-592, June.
    20. Markus Kitzmueller & Jay Shimshack, 2012. "Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 51-84, March.
    21. Terlau, Wiltrud & Hirsch, Darya, 2015. "Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristia Kristia & Sándor Kovács & Zoltán Bács & Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Food Consumption: Historical Evolution, Dominant Topics and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Wells, Victoria K. & Manika, Danae & Gregory-Smith, Diana & Taheri, Babak & McCowlen, Clair, 2015. "Heritage tourism, CSR and the role of employee environmental behaviour," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 399-413.
    3. Carmen Bălan, 2020. "How Does Retail Engage Consumers in Sustainable Consumption? A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Jeanette Klink-Lehmann & Nina Langen & Johannes Simons & Monika Hartmann, 2022. "Jumping on the Bandwagon of Responsibility—Or Not? Consumers’ Perceived Role in the Meat Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Jisu Jang & Jiyun Kang, 2023. "CnSR: Exploring Consumer Social Responsibility Using Machine Learning-Based Topic Modeling with Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Georgieva, Daniela & Georgieva, Teodora, 2020. "Staff-related disclosures as an element of social policies on the model of Bulgarian black sea hotels," MPRA Paper 103391, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2020.
    7. David Benjamin Billedeau & Jeffrey Wilson & Naima Samuel, 2022. "From Responsibility to Requirement: COVID, Cars, and the Future of Corporate Social Responsibility in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Sarah Verdonk & Keri Chiveralls & Drew Dawson, 2017. "Getting Wasted at WOMADelaide: The Effect of Signage on Waste Disposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Halkos, George & Nomikos, Stylianos, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 106-117.
    10. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.
    11. Werner Hediger, 2013. "From Multifunctionality and Sustainability of Agriculture to the Social Responsibility of the Agri-food System," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 6(1), pages 59-80.
    12. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Eva-Maria Waltner & Werner Rieß & Christoph Mischo, 2019. "Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Student Sustainability Competencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Atsushi Watabe & Simon Gilby, 2020. "To See a World in a Grain of Sand—The Transformative Potential of Small Community Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Martin Mueller & Virginia dos Santos & Stefan Seuring, 2009. "The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 509-523, November.
    16. Andy Felix Jităreanu & Mioara Mihăilă & Alexandru-Dragoș Robu & Florin-Daniel Lipșa & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu, 2022. "Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Percy Marquina & Vincent Charles, 2021. "A Bayesian resampling approach to estimate the difference in effect sizes in consumer social responses to CSR initiatives versus corporate abilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1680-1699, November.
    18. Kutaula, Smirti & Gillani, Alvina & Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Christodoulides, Paul, 2022. "Integrating fair trade with circular economy: Personality traits, consumer engagement, and ethically-minded behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1087-1102.
    19. Carlos Sánchez‐Camacho & Rocío Carranza & David Martín‐Consuegra & Estrella Díaz, 2022. "Evolution, trends and future research lines in corporate social responsibility and tourism: A bibliometric analysis and science mapping," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 462-476, June.
    20. von Geibler, Justus & Stelzer, Franziska, 2020. "Reallabore als umweltbezogenes Politikinstrument: Kurzstudie im Rahmen der Digitalagenda des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit," Wuppertal Reports 19, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13342-:d:693360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.