IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13323-d692964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Planning, Scheduling, and Layout Optimization for Multi-Unit Mass-Customized Products in Sustainable Reconfigurable Manufacturing System

Author

Listed:
  • Sini Gao

    (Roberval (Mechanics, Energy and Electricity), Centre de Recherche Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CEDEX, CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne, France)

  • Joanna Daaboul

    (Roberval (Mechanics, Energy and Electricity), Centre de Recherche Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CEDEX, CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne, France)

  • Julien Le Duigou

    (Roberval (Mechanics, Energy and Electricity), Centre de Recherche Royallieu, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CEDEX, CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne, France)

Abstract

Currently, manufacturers seek to provide customized and sustainable products, requiring flexible manufacturing systems and advanced production management to cope with customization complexity and improve environmental performance. The reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) is expected to provide cost-effective customization in high responsiveness. However, reconfiguration optimization to produce sustainable mass-customized products in RMS is a complex problem requiring multi-criteria decision making. It is related to three problems, process planning, scheduling, and layout optimization, which should be integrated to optimize the RMS performance. This paper aims at integrating the above three problems and developing an effective approach to solving them concurrently. It formulates a multi-objective mathematical model simultaneously optimizing process planning, job-shop scheduling, and open-field layout problem to improve RMS sustainability. The penalty for product tardiness, the total manufacturing cost, the hazardous waste, and the greenhouse gases emissions are minimized. Economic and environmental indicators are defined to modify the Pareto efficiency when searching the Pareto-optimal solutions. Exact Pareto-optimal solutions are obtained by brute-force search and compared with those of the non-environmental indicator model. NSGA-III is adopted to obtain the approximate Pareto-optimal solutions in high effectiveness and efficiency. A small numerical example is applied to validate the mathematical model and resolution methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Sini Gao & Joanna Daaboul & Julien Le Duigou, 2021. "Process Planning, Scheduling, and Layout Optimization for Multi-Unit Mass-Customized Products in Sustainable Reconfigurable Manufacturing System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13323-:d:692964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qi Wang & Peipei Qi & Shipei Li, 2021. "A Concurrence Optimization Model for Low-Carbon Product Family Design and the Procurement Plan of Components under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Kezia Amanda Kurniadi & Kwangyeol Ryu, 2021. "Development of Multi-Disciplinary Green-BOM to Maintain Sustainability in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Faycal A. Touzout & Lyes Benyoucef, 2019. "Multi-objective multi-unit process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: a comparative study of three hybrid metaheuristics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(24), pages 7520-7535, December.
    4. Ateekh Ur Rehman & Syed Hammad Mian & Usama Umer & Yusuf Siraj Usmani, 2019. "Strategic Outcome Using Fuzzy-AHP-Based Decision Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Da Silveira, Giovani & Borenstein, Denis & Fogliatto, Flavio S., 2001. "Mass customization: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessio Trentin & Enrico Sandrin & Svetlana Suzic & Chiara Grosso & Cipriano Forza, 2025. "Reconciling Product Flexibility with Cost, Delivery, and Quality: The Importance of Bundling Mass Customization Practices," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(2), pages 269-293, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rönnberg Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Capability configurations for advanced service offerings in manufacturing firms: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5330-5335.
    2. Zhou, Wei & Piramuthu, Selwyn, 2012. "Manufacturing with item-level RFID information: From macro to micro quality control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 929-938.
    3. Natalia Szozda & Artur Świerczek, 2022. "Upstream and downstream dyad governance within the network structures: Creating supply chain governance for the customized products," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 873-898, June.
    4. Na Liu & Pui-Sze Chow & Hongshan Zhao, 2020. "Challenges and critical successful factors for apparel mass customization operations: recent development and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 531-563, August.
    5. Sandrin, Enrico & Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano, 2018. "Leveraging high-involvement practices to develop mass customization capability: A contingent configurational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 335-345.
    6. Süleyman BARUTCU, 2007. "Customized Products: The Integrating Relationship Marketing, Agile Manufacturing And Supply Chain Management For Mass Customization," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 573-593.
    7. Dirk Briskorn & Konrad Stephan & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Minimizing the makespan on a single machine subject to modular setups," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 125-137, February.
    8. Brian Squire & Steve Brown & Jeff Readman & John Bessant, 2006. "The Impact of Mass Customisation on Manufacturing Trade‐offs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 15(1), pages 10-21, March.
    9. A. Arrighetti & F. Landini, 2018. "Eterogeneità delle imprese e stagnazione del capitalismo italiano," Economics Department Working Papers 2018-EP01, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    10. Ding, Huiping & Chen, Xiangbo & Lin, Kuanhai & Wei, Yunbing, 2019. "Collaborative mechanism of project profit allotment in petroleum engineering service chain with customized integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 163-174.
    11. Weckenborg, Christian & Schumacher, Patrick & Thies, Christian & Spengler, Thomas S., 2024. "Flexibility in manufacturing system design: A review of recent approaches from Operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 413-441.
    12. Lihra, Torsten & Buehlmann, Urs & Graf, Raoul, 2012. "Customer preferences for customized household furniture," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 94-112.
    13. Dandan He & Zhongfu Li & Chunlin Wu & Xin Ning, 2018. "An E-Commerce Platform for Industrialized Construction Procurement Based on BIM and Linked Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Ye Yan & Suraksha Gupta & Klaus Schoefer & Tana Licsandru, 2020. "A Review of E-mass Customization as a Branding Strategy," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 215-223, August.
    15. Tai-Yoo Kim & Mi-Ae Jung & Eungdo Kim & Eunnyeong Heo, 2011. "The Faster-Accelerating Growth of the Knowledge-Based Society," TEMEP Discussion Papers 201181, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Nov 2011.
    16. Cynthia dos Santos Hentschke & Carlos Torres Formoso & Marcia Elisa Echeveste, 2020. "A Customer Integration Framework for the Development of Mass Customised Housing Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Anzanello, Michel J. & Fogliatto, Flavio S., 2011. "Selecting the best clustering variables for grouping mass-customized products involving workers' learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 268-276, April.
    18. Zhang, Min & Zhao, Xiande & Qi, Yinan, 2014. "The effects of organizational flatness, coordination, and product modularity on mass customization capability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 145-155.
    19. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska, 2021. "The Concept of Cyber-Physical Networks of Small and Medium Enterprises under Personalized Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Mosayebi, Mohsen & Fathi, Michel & Hedayati, Mehrnaz Khalaj & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2024. "Time-to-Adapt (TTA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13323-:d:692964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.