IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12667-d680389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the E-Commerce Business Model in a Sustainable Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Mingwei Sun

    (College of Computer Science and Technology, Tonghua Normal University, Tonghua 134000, China)

  • Katarzyna Grondys

    (Faculty Management, Czestochowa University of Technology (CUT), 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Nazim Hajiyev

    (Department of Economics and Business Administration, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Baku 1001, Azerbaijan)

  • Pavel Zhukov

    (Department of Public Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 117437 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive methodological approach to assess the sustainability of the e-commerce business model based on the integration of key performance indicators into a single vector of business model sustainability. The proposed vector approach allows for predicting and evaluating the effects of different kinds of measures, identifying and implementing the most effective tools for sustainable e-commerce business development. The methodology of this study is based on correlation, cluster and regression analysis. The scientific contribution of this study is the proposed methodological approach, which not only allows one to analyze business model sustainability, but also to compare companies in a competitive environment to determine the priorities of their functioning to achieve leadership positions on the background of sustainable development. The correlation analysis proved that in modern conditions, both economic and environmental components are significant for business model effectiveness in e-commerce. The clustering of the studied e-commerce companies provided an opportunity to take into account the peculiarities of the studied companies, to group them by similar performance indicators. This made it possible to develop more accurate regression models for each cluster. In this case, there is a correlation between the sustainability vector of the business model of a company and its assignment to a particular cluster. The conducted modeling and determination of the level of business model sustainability allowed for determining a relationship between it and the performance of e-commerce companies in the context of economic, environmental and social dimensions. At the same time, the results show that increasing the sustainability vector brings a company closer to the business sustainability benchmark.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingwei Sun & Katarzyna Grondys & Nazim Hajiyev & Pavel Zhukov, 2021. "Improving the E-Commerce Business Model in a Sustainable Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12667-:d:680389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12667/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12667/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Himanshu Sharma & Anu G. Aggarwal, 2019. "Finding determinants of e-commerce success: a PLS-SEM approach," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 453-471, March.
    2. Yi Jiang & Polin Lai & Chia-Hsun Chang & Kum Fai Yuen & Sihang Li & Xinchen Wang, 2021. "Sustainable Management for Fresh Food E-Commerce Logistics Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Yan Guo & Chengxin Yin & Mingfu Li & Xiaoting Ren & Ping Liu, 2018. "Mobile e-Commerce Recommendation System Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion for Sustainable e-Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Chun-Liang Chen & Yao-Chin Lin & Wei-Hung Chen & Cheng-Fu Chao & Henry Pandia, 2021. "Role of Government to Enhance Digital Transformation in Small Service Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Arpan Kumar Kar, 2021. "What Affects Usage Satisfaction in Mobile Payments? Modelling User Generated Content to Develop the “Digital Service Usage Satisfaction Model”," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1341-1361, September.
    6. Jian Liu & Chunlin Liu & Lanping Zhang & Yi Xu, 2020. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Research on sales information prediction system of e-commerce enterprises based on time series model," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 823-836, December.
    7. ., 2017. "Engines, ecologies and economic systems," Chapters, in: Public Debt, chapter 3, pages 57-83, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Chunting Liu & Guozhu Jia & Jili Kong, 2020. "Requirement-Oriented Engineering Characteristic Identification for a Sustainable Product–Service System: A Multi-Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Gal, Tali, 2017. "An ecological model of child and youth participation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 57-64.
    10. Xiaohong Jiang & Huiying Wang & Xiucheng Guo & Xiaolin Gong, 2019. "Using the FAHP, ISM, and MICMAC Approaches to Study the Sustainability Influencing Factors of the Last Mile Delivery of Rural E-Commerce Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Habib Ullah Khan & Stellamaris Uwemi, 2018. "What are e-commerce possible challenges in developing countries: a case study of Nigeria," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 454-486.
    12. Regina Frei & Lisa Jack & Sally‐Ann Krzyzaniak, 2020. "Sustainable reverse supply chains and circular economy in multichannel retail returns," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1925-1940, July.
    13. Ying Wang & Fu Jia & Tobias Schoenherr & Yu Gong, 2018. "Supply Chain-Based Business Model Innovation: The Case of a Cross-Border E-Commerce Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Jinhyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KyungBae Park & Lei Shi, 2020. "Sustainability Condition of Open Innovation: Dynamic Growth of Alibaba from SME to Large Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radosław Drozd & Radosław Wolniak & Jan Piwnik, 2023. "Systemic analysis of a manufacturing process based on a small scale bakery," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1421-1437, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rohit Agrawal & Vishal A. Wankhede & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra, 2021. "Analysing the roadblocks of circular economy adoption in the automobile sector: Reducing waste and environmental perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1051-1066, February.
    2. Simmons-Horton, Sherri Y., 2017. "Providing age-appropriate activities for youth in foster care: Policy implementation process in three states," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 383-391.
    3. Khando Khando & M. Sirajul Islam & Shang Gao, 2022. "The Emerging Technologies of Digital Payments and Associated Challenges: A Systematic Literature Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Paulo Rita & Ricardo F. Ramos, 2022. "Global Research Trends in Consumer Behavior and Sustainability in E-Commerce: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Leogrande, Angelo, 2024. "Companies with at least 10 Employees Selling Online across the Italian Regions," MPRA Paper 120637, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Himanshu Sharma & Abhishek Tandon & P. K. Kapur & Anu G. Aggarwal, 2019. "Ranking hotels using aspect ratings based sentiment classification and interval-valued neutrosophic TOPSIS," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(5), pages 973-983, October.
    8. Kannan Govindan & Arash Khalili Nasr & Farzane Karimi & Hassan Mina, 2022. "Circular economy adoption barriers: An extended fuzzy best–worst method using fuzzy DEMATEL and Supermatrix structure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1566-1586, May.
    9. Chenxi Li & Kening Wu & Xiangyu Gao, 2020. "Manufacturing industry agglomeration and spatial clustering: Evidence from Hebei Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 2941-2965, April.
    10. Obadiah Jonathan Gimba & Abdulkareem Alhassan & Huseyin Ozdeser & Wafa Ghardallou & Mehdi Seraj & Ojonugwa Usman, 2023. "Towards low carbon and sustainable environment: does income inequality mitigate ecological footprints in Sub-Saharan Africa?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10425-10445, September.
    11. Duramy, Benedetta Faedi & Gal, Tali, 2020. "Understanding and implementing child participation: Lessons from the Global South," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. Watanabe, Chihiro & Akhtar, Waleed & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2021. "Amazon's New Supra-Omnichannel: Realizing Growing Seamless Switching for Apparel During COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Xiaoxu Zhang & Xinyu Du, 2023. "Industry and Regional Peer Effects in Corporate Digital Transformation: The Moderating Effects of TMT Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2023. "Big data in relation with business intelligence capabilities and e-commerce during COVID-19 pandemic in accountant’s perspective," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    17. Francisco Javier Villegas Pinuer & Joan Llonch Andreu & Pilar López Belbeze & Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández, 2021. "Waste Management. The Disconnection between Normative and SMEs Reality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Faten Aisyah Ahmad Ramli & Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah & Siti Norida Wahab & Rishabh Shekhar, 2023. "Modeling the Brand Equity and Usage Intention of QR-Code E-Wallets," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Jiang, Yi & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Augmented reality shopping application usage: The influence of attitude, value, and characteristics of innovation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Michelle Scobie, 2020. "International aid, trade and investment and access and allocation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-254, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12667-:d:680389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.