IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/mccss1/v2y2023i2p55-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gendered Perspectives in Workplace Dynamics: Supervisory Satisfaction and Work-Life Balance

Author

Listed:
  • Arsalan Ali

    (University of Punjab Lahore)

Abstract

Gender differences have been identified as significant factors in the workplace. The happiness experienced by employees with their supervisors subsequently leads to increased job satisfaction and enhanced productivity. This study endeavors to explore the interplay of gender dynamics, supervisory satisfaction, and Work-Life Balance (WLB) within an organizational framework. Utilizing a quantitative approach via survey questionnaires, the research aims to establish associations among these elements. Employing the WLB Scale and Satisfaction-With-My-Supervisor Scale (SWMSS) instruments, hypotheses were formulated based on existing literature to investigate gender disparities in WLB and supervisory satisfaction. Convenient sampling across various enterprises in Pakistan yielded 200 participants meeting specified criteria. The study unfolded multifaceted insights into subordinate-supervisor relationships, gender congruence, and their impacts on WLB and supervisory satisfaction. Notable disparities emerged between same-gender and opposite-gender supervisor-subordinate pairs, elucidating the positive correlation between gender congruence and effective working relationships. While satisfaction levels varied modestly based on supervisor gender, unfavorable organizational events did not significantly impact WLB or supervisory satisfaction concerning gender. Moreover, the study identified a significant negative influence of WLB on job satisfaction, highlighting specific aspects of WLB that notably impact satisfaction levels. This investigation challenges prevalent misconceptions by revealing limited gender disparities in WLB experiences, despite statistically significant yet negligible associations favoring women in specific aspects of work-family conflict. Dissections into parental status and dual-earner couples reflected nuanced relationships, with women often experiencing higher interference with work in these scenarios. Explorations into employment duration under supervisors underscored significant correlations with supervisory satisfaction, while marital status predominantly influenced WLB. The study's focus on supervisor-subordinate dynamics aims to foster healthier relationships, acknowledging certain limitations such as the reliance on quantitative methods and sample specificity. In conclusion, this study illuminates the preferential treatment within same-gender supervisor-subordinate relationships, suggesting an inclination of supervisors toward subordinates of their gender. Moreover, the research underscores the substantial impact of employment duration under a specific supervisor on overall satisfaction. Despite criticisms, WLB remains a crucial influencer of observed outcomes, hinting at the intricate balance between work and personal life domains. The findings not only challenge common perceptions but also underscore the need for more in-depth explorations into these issues to better comprehend the impact of gender dynamics on workplace relationships and individual satisfactio

Suggested Citation

  • Arsalan Ali, 2023. "Gendered Perspectives in Workplace Dynamics: Supervisory Satisfaction and Work-Life Balance," Magna Carta: Contemporary Social Science, 50sea, vol. 2(2), pages 55-64, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:mccss1:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:55-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/MC/article/view/643/1181
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/MC/article/view/643
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Dijke, Marius & Leunissen, Joost M. & Wildschut, Tim & Sedikides, Constantine, 2019. "Nostalgia promotes intrinsic motivation and effort in the presence of low interactional justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 46-61.
    2. Tahira Hassan Butt & Ghulam Abid & Bindu Arya & Saira Farooqi, 2020. "Employee energy and subjective well-being: a moderated mediation model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1-2), pages 133-157, January.
    3. Jinhyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KyungBae Park & Lei Shi, 2020. "Sustainability Condition of Open Innovation: Dynamic Growth of Alibaba from SME to Large Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Zheng Liu, 2019. "Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Jinhyo Joseph Yun & MinHwa Lee & KyungBae Park & Xiaofei Zhao, 2019. "Open Innovation and Serial Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-31, September.
    6. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Cahill, Kevin E. & McNamara, Tay K. & Pitt-Catsouphes, Marcie & Valcour, Monique, 2015. "Linking shifts in the national economy with changes in job satisfaction, employee engagement and work–life balance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 40-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belén Payán-Sánchez & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Diego Vazquez-Brust & Natalia Yakovleva & Miguel Pérez-Valls, 2021. "Open Innovation for Sustainability or Not: Literature Reviews of Global Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Zhang, Jingjing & Groen, Aard, 2021. "Informal and formal open activities: Innovation protection methods as antecedents and innovation outputs as consequences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. I Nyoman Normal & Made Setini, 2022. "Absorption Capacity and Development of Photocatalyst Green Ceramic Products with Moderation of Green Environment for Sustainability Performance of Developing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Jose Alejandro Cano & Abraham Londoño-Pineda & Maria Fanny Castro & Hugo Bécquer Paz & Carolina Rodas & Tatiana Arias, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review on E-Marketplaces, Open Innovation, and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-42, May.
    6. Joana Costa & João C.O. Matias, 2020. "Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Bożena Gajdzik & Radosław Wolniak & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2023. "Electricity and Heat Demand in Steel Industry Technological Processes in Industry 4.0 Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Xin Cao & Taohua Ouyang & Puzant Balozian & Sixuan Zhang, 2020. "The Role of Managerial Cognitive Capability in Developing a Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Xiaomi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Shazia Parveen & Iqra Abdullah & Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Muhammad Umar Farooq & Shazia Qayuum, 2023. "Reconnoitering the Nexus Between Organizational Culture and Open Innovation Systems," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    10. Karlygash Madazimova & Aliya Mambetalina, 2025. "The Impact of Stress Factors on Employee Subjective Well-Being: The Case of Kazakhstan," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11314-11338, September.
    11. Călin S. Vac & Ileana Andreica & Ioana A. Roman, 2023. "Prospects for Research, Development, Innovation and Technology Transfer in Romanian Horticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    12. RAJI, Ismaheel Adewumi & Ladan, Sahnun & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Idris, Isma’il Tijjani, 2021. "Organisational Commitment, Work Engagement and Job Performance: Empirical Study on Nigeria’s Public Healthcare System," OSF Preprints 6v9jw, Center for Open Science.
    13. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Eristian WIBISONO, 2024. "Strengthening Civil Society Engagement In Regional Innovation Policy: A Quadruple Helix Perspective," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 49-69, August.
    15. Javier Muñoz de Prat & María Escriva-Beltran & Roberto Gómez-Calvet, 2020. "Joint Ventures and Sustainable Development. A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Yee Yee Sein & Viktor Prokop, 2021. "Mediating Role of Firm R&D in Creating Product and Process Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Norway," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Taesun Kim & Sang-Don Lee, 2022. "Designing for Green and Grey: Insights from Single-Use Plastic Water Bottles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Grahame Smith & Chloe Dixon & Rafaela Neiva Ganga & Daz Greenop, 2022. "How Do We Know Co-Created Solutions Work Effectively within the Real World of People Living with Dementia? Learning Methodological Lessons from a Co-Creation-to-Evaluation Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-9, November.
    19. Yeimi Xiomara Holguín Rengifo & Juan Felipe Herrera Vargas & Alejandro Valencia-Arias, 2023. "Proposal for a Comprehensive Tool to Measure Smart Cities under the Triple-Helix Model: Capacities Learning, Research, and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Tao Li & Junlin Zhu & Jianqiang Luo & Chaonan Yi & Baoqing Zhu, 2023. "Breaking Triopoly to Achieve Sustainable Smart Digital Infrastructure Based on Open-Source Diffusion Using Government–Platform–User Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:mccss1:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:55-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Shehzad Hassan (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.