IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11180-d653231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Certeze Village: The Dilemma of Traditional vs. Post-Modern Architecture in Țara Oașului, Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Iuliana Vijulie

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1.Blv. Nicolae Balcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1.Blv. Nicolae Balcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihaela Preda

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1.Blv. Nicolae Balcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Alina Mareci

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1.Blv. Nicolae Balcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Elena Matei

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1.Blv. Nicolae Balcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Roxana Cuculici

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1.Blv. Nicolae Balcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ana-Maria Taloș

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 1.Blv. Nicolae Balcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
    Romanian Young Academy, University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The traditional Romanian village has recently seen unmistakable transformations. The import of architectural styles from EU countries and the need to modernise dwellings, combined with considerable legislative voids regarding the protection of the built-up heritage, have strongly modified traditional architecture and resulted in irremediable losses in terms of rural authenticity and landscape aesthetics. This study aims to analyse the need for preserving existing traditional architecture in Certeze village, which has been severely jeopardised by the import of post-modern elements. The perception of both locals and tourists on these aspects was evaluated using the survey method. Results outlined more conservative views from the older inhabitants who are still attached to traditional constructing styles, while younger respondents preferred the more modern houses. Most tourists also showed an increased interest in the traditional architecture and criticised the newer constructed buildings. The contrast between old and new, which at this point is ubiquitous in the area, remains an element of intergenerational negotiations and risks the diminishing of the cultural authenticity of Certeze even further.

Suggested Citation

  • Iuliana Vijulie & Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Mihaela Preda & Alina Mareci & Elena Matei & Roxana Cuculici & Ana-Maria Taloș, 2021. "Certeze Village: The Dilemma of Traditional vs. Post-Modern Architecture in Țara Oașului, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11180-:d:653231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dušan Tomanović & Irena Rajković & Mirko Grbić & Julija Aleksić & Nebojša Gadžić & Jasmina Lukić & Tijana Tomanović, 2019. "Houses Based on Natural Stone; A Case Study—The Bay of Kotor (Montenegro)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-35, July.
    2. Taner Okan & Nesibe Köse & Elif Arifoğlu & Coşkun Köse, 2016. "Assessing Ecotourism Potential of Traditional Wooden Architecture in Rural Areas: The Case of Papart Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Gandino, E., 2018. "Co-designing the solution space for rural regeneration in a new World Heritage site: A Choice Experiments approachAuthor-Name: Ferretti, V," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1077-1091.
    4. Paola Gullino & Gabriele Loris Beccaro & Federica Larcher, 2015. "Assessing and Monitoring the Sustainability in Rural World Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Tiziano Cattaneo & Emanuele Giorgi & Minqing Ni, 2018. "Landscape, Architecture and Environmental Regeneration: A Research by Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism in a Rural Village in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
    6. Bianca Mitrică & Irena Mocanu & Monica Dumitraşcu & Ines Grigorescu, 2017. "Socio-Economic Disparities in the Development of the Romania’s Border Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 899-916, December.
    7. Mariana Nae & Liliana Dumitrache & Bogdan Suditu & Elena Matei, 2019. "Housing Activism Initiatives and Land-Use Conflicts: Pathways for Participatory Planning and Urban Sustainable Development in Bucharest City, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-26, November.
    8. Cosimo A. Picuno & Ivan Laković & Demetrios Roubis & Pietro Picuno & Aleksandra Kapetanović, 2017. "Analysis of the Characteristics of Traditional Rural Constructions for Animal Corrals in the Adriatic-Ionian Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Zhang & Runni Zhang & Qilun Li & Xue Zhang & Xiong He, 2023. "Spatial Sifferentiation and Differentiated Development Paths of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Florentina-Cristina Merciu & Cornel Păunescu & Mircea Dorobanţu & George-Laurenţiu Merciu, 2022. "Assessing the Value of Railway Heritage for Sustainable Development: The Case Study of the Oraviţa–Anina Railway, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-43, October.
    3. Tiberiu Iancu & Ionuț Laurențiu Petre & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Marius Mihai Micu & Ana Ursu & Florina-Ruxandra Teodorescu & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru, 2022. "A Difficult Pattern to Change in Romania, the Perspective of Socio-Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han-Shen Chen, 2020. "The Construction and Validation of a Sustainable Tourism Development Evaluation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Qi Mu & Fabrizio Aimar, 2022. "How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Kleemann, Janina & Struve, Berenike & Spyra, Marcin, 2023. "Conflicts in urban peripheries in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. McKenna, R. & Bertsch, V. & Mainzer, K. & Fichtner, W., 2018. "Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1092-1110.
    7. Shichao Zhao, 2022. "Creating Futuristic Heritage Experiences: An Exploratory Co-Design Study through Design Fiction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    9. František Petrovič & Martin Boltižiar & Iveta Rakytová & Ivana Tomčíková & Eva Pauditšová, 2021. "Long-Term Development Trend of the Historical Cultural Landscape of the UNESCO Monument: Vlkolínec (Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Paola Gullino & Maria Gabriella Mellano & Gabriele Loris Beccaro & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2020. "Strategies for the Management of Traditional Chestnut Landscapes in Pesio Valley, Italy: A Participatory Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Ivan Laković & Aleksandra Kapetanović & Olga Pelcer-Vujačić & Tatjana Koprivica, 2020. "Endangered Mediterranean Mountain Heritage—Case Study of katuns at the Kuči Mountain in Montenegro," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Paola Gullino & Luca Battisti & Federica Larcher, 2018. "Linking Multifunctionality and Sustainability for Valuing Peri-Urban Farming: A Case Study in the Turin Metropolitan Area (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Qindong Fan & Fengtian Du & Hu Li, 2020. "A Study of the Spatial Form of Maling Village, Henan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Ferretti, V., 2021. "Framing territorial regeneration decisions: Purpose, perspective and scope," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Marta Gwiaździńska-Goraj & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Małgorzata Dudzińska, 2022. "Assessment of the Living Conditions in Polish and German Transborder Regions in the Context of Strengthening Territorial Cohesion in the European Union: Competitiveness or Complementation?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 29-59, August.
    16. Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2023. "Land Use Planning and Green Environment Services: The Contribution of Trail Paths to Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Enrico Pomatto & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2022. "Assessment of the Terraced Landscapes’ Integrity: A GIS-Based Approach in a Potential GIAHS-FAO Site (Northwest Piedmont, Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Soonki Kim, 2016. "World Heritage Site Designation Impacts on a Historic Village: A Case Study on Residents’ Perceptions of Hahoe Village (Korea)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Mara Balestrieri & Amedeo Ganciu, 2018. "Landscape Changes in Rural Areas: A Focus on Sardinian Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Frontuto, Vito & Corsi, Alessandro & Novelli, Silvia & Gullino, Paola & Larcher, Federica, 2020. "The visual impact of agricultural sheds on rural landscapes: The willingness to pay for mitigation solutions and treatment effects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11180-:d:653231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.