IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10004-d453957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital?

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 200396 Craiova, Dolj, Romania
    Department of Economics and Economic Policy, Economy I Doctoral School, Faculty of Theoretical and Applied Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, 030018 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Natural and Technological Hazards, The National Institute for Research and Development in Environmental Protection (I.N.C.D.P.M.), 060031 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Nowadays, sustainability assessment procedures, sustainability assessment indicators, and sustainability assessment models are regarded by specialists as powerful decision-supporting tools able to foster sustainable development worldwide by addressing the main economic, financial, social, and environmental challenges. In like manner, the role and relevance of intangible assets have managed to produce an irreversible change in today’s world which also seriously affected the general traits of our economic systems, leading to a phenomenon known by specialists as the “revolution of intangibles”. Over the last decades, the controversies regarding the recognition and measurement of intellectual capital (IC) have led, on the one hand, to the development of possible solutions and systems for calculating and disclosing the performance generated or stimulated by various components of IC, but, on the other hand, they have also been the main premise that favored the use of intangible assets, in general, and intellectual property (IP), in particular, the transfer of results and the reduction of the tax base by transferring income to tax havens or jurisdictions that do not tax these categories of assets. Against these aggressive methods of fiscal planning, the countries reacted unitarily and coordinated through the BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) plan. Based on the country’s profile as well as on the results of the annual evaluations published by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), our study verifies whether there are premises for IP use for income transfer into favorable jurisdictions and whether the measures and solutions proposed by Action 5 of the BEPS end disputes over the recognition and evaluation of IC. In addition, our work presents a novel methodological framework for sustainability assessment, which focuses on establishing important connections between the recognition and measurement of intellectual capital, the role of sustainability assessment tools, and the implications of corporate social responsibility, since, these days, the real “values” associated with a country or business profile may be found in the intangible assets they possess.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10004-:d:453957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucia Saganeiti & Antonella Favale & Angela Pilogallo & Francesco Scorza & Beniamino Murgante, 2018. "Assessing Urban Fragmentation at Regional Scale Using Sprinkling Indexes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Marco Parlavecchia & Simone Pascuzzi & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Francesco Santoro & Giuseppe Ruggiero, 2019. "Use of GIS to Evaluate Minor Rural Buildings Distribution Compared to the Communication Routes in a Part of the Apulian Territory (Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Ana Maria-Irina, 2017. "Tourism industry in the new Europe: trends, policies and challenges," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 493-503, July.
    4. Marilisa Biscione & Maria Danese & Nicola Masini, 2018. "A framework for cultural heritage management and research: the Cancellara case study," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 576-582, November.
    5. Tiechou Shi & Xiubin Li & Liangjie Xin & Xiaohong Xu, 2016. "Analysis of Farmland Abandonment at Parcel Level: A Case Study in the Mountainous Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Carolina Perpina Castillo & Boyan Kavalov & Ricardo Ribeiro Barranco & Vasco Diogo & Chris Jacobs-Crisioni & Filipe Batista e Silva & Claudia Baranzelli & Carlo Lavalle, 2018. "Territorial Fact and Trends in the EU Rural Areas within 2015-2030," JRC Research Reports JRC114016, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Cosimo A. Picuno & Ivan Laković & Demetrios Roubis & Pietro Picuno & Aleksandra Kapetanović, 2017. "Analysis of the Characteristics of Traditional Rural Constructions for Animal Corrals in the Adriatic-Ionian Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Andreas Haller & Oliver Bender, 2018. "Among rewilding mountains: grassland conservation and abandoned settlements in the Northern Apennines," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 1068-1084, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Esra Karapınar Kocağ, 2022. "Would You like to Work More Hours?—An Investigation on South Africa," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Pradip Debnath & Hari Mohan Srivastava, 2021. "Optimal Returns in Indian Stock Market during Global Pandemic: A Comparative Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Cillis & Dina Statuto & Pietro Picuno, 2019. "Vernacular Farm Buildings and Rural Landscape: A Geospatial Approach for Their Integrated Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Zhonglei Yu & Lei Liu & Hua Zhang & Jinshe Liang, 2017. "Exploring the Factors Driving Seasonal Farmland Abandonment: A Case Study at the Regional Level in Hunan Province, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Julia Weiss & Livio Ferrante & Mariano Soler-Porta, 2021. "There Is No Place like Home! How Willing Are Young Adults to Move to Find a Job?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Bernardino Romano & Lorena Fiorini & Alessandro Marucci, 2019. "Italy without Urban ‘Sprinkling’. A Uchronia for a Country that Needs a Retrofit of Its Urban and Landscape Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Mara Balestrieri & Amedeo Ganciu, 2018. "Landscape Changes in Rural Areas: A Focus on Sardinian Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Giuseppe La Verde & Vittoria D’Avino & Carlo Sabbarese & Fabrizio Ambrosino & Vincenzo Roca & Adelaide Raulo & Mariagabriella Pugliese, 2020. "Radiation Protection Legislation and Sustainable Development of a Rural Green Tuff Village of Ischia Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Janus, Jaroslaw & Markuszewska, Iwona, 2019. "Forty years later: Assessment of the long-lasting effectiveness of land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 22-31.
    8. Beniamino Murgante & Giuseppe Borruso & Ginevra Balletto & Paolo Castiglia & Marco Dettori, 2020. "Why Italy First? Health, Geographical and Planning Aspects of the COVID-19 Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-44, June.
    9. Xue Wang, 2022. "Changes in Cultivated Land Loss and Landscape Fragmentation in China from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Fanya Qin & Katsue Fukamachi & Shozo Shibata, 2022. "Land-Use/Landscape Pattern Changes and Related Environmental Driving Forces in a Dong Ethnic Minority Village in Southwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Raju Rai & Yili Zhang & Basanta Paudel & Narendra Raj Khanal, 2019. "Status of Farmland Abandonment and Its Determinants in the Transboundary Gandaki River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Dimitris Goussios & Ioannis Faraslis, 2024. "Navigating the Past through an Interactive Geovisualisation-Driven Methodology: Locating a 15th–19th Century Paddy Field as a Source of Agro-Ecological Knowledge (Thessaly, Greece)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Uttam Khanal, 2018. "Why are farmers keeping cultivatable lands fallow even though there is food scarcity in Nepal?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(3), pages 603-614, June.
    14. Yuhan Wang & Chenyujing Yang & Yuanyuan Zhang & Yongji Xue, 2023. "Mountainous Areas: Alleviating the Shortage of Cultivated Land Caused by Changing Dietary Structure in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Sangay Wangchuk & Jennifer Bond & Rik Thwaites & Max Finlayson, 2023. "Exploring Human–Wildlife Conflict and Implications for Food Self-Sufficiency in Bhutan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Urbieta, Pablo & Fernandez, Emilio & Ramos, Luís & Méndez Martínez, Gonzalo & Bento, Ricardo, 2019. "A land-cover based urban dispersion indicator suitable for highly dispersed, discontinuously artificialized territories: The case of continental Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 92-103.
    17. Ronchi, Silvia & Pontarollo, Nicola & Serpieri, Carolina, 2021. "Clustering the built form at LAU2 level for addressing sustainable policies: Insights from the Belgium case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. George Martinidis & Muluken Elias Adamseged & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Yannis Fallas & Angeliki Foutri & Philipp Grundmann & Karen Hamann & Stanislaw Minta & Nikolaos Ntavos & Tora Råberg & Silvia Russo & , 2021. "How Clusters Create Shared Value in Rural Areas: An Examination of Six Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Michał Sobala, 2020. "Mountain Meadows and Glades of the Carpathians—Type or Element of Landscape? The Problem of Delimitation and Typology of Mountain Pasture Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Francesco Scorza & Giovanni Fortunato & Raffaella Carbone & Beniamino Murgante & Piergiuseppe Pontrandolfi, 2021. "Increasing Urban Walkability through Citizens’ Participation Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10004-:d:453957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.