IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p4-d299091.html

Vernacular Farm Buildings and Rural Landscape: A Geospatial Approach for Their Integrated Management

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Cillis

    (SAFE School of Agricultural, Forest, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano, n. 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy)

  • Dina Statuto

    (SAFE School of Agricultural, Forest, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano, n. 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy)

  • Pietro Picuno

    (SAFE School of Agricultural, Forest, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano, n. 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy)

Abstract

Over the centuries, farm buildings, which accompany the development of agriculture, have played an important role in defining spatial and environmental planning. In some European countries in particular, these rural structures have been built based on traditional agricultural needs and typical land characteristics. Considering the land abandonment that has occurred over the last five decades, with farmers moving to more comfortable residences in neighboring urban settlements, historical farm buildings have often been abandoned, thus causing a leakage of the historical-cultural heritage of the rural landscape. Nowadays, open data and geographic technologies together with advanced technological tools allow us to gather multidisciplinary information about the specific characteristics of each farm building, thus improving our knowledge. This information can greatly support the protection of those buildings and landscapes that have high cultural and naturalistic value. In this paper, the potential of Geographic Information Systems to catalogue the farm buildings of the Basilicata region (Southern Italy) is explored. The analysis of these buildings, traditionally known as masserie , integrates some typical aspects of landscape studies, paving the way for sustainable management of the important cultural heritage represented by vernacular farm buildings and the rural landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Cillis & Dina Statuto & Pietro Picuno, 2019. "Vernacular Farm Buildings and Rural Landscape: A Geospatial Approach for Their Integrated Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:4-:d:299091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marilisa Biscione & Maria Danese & Nicola Masini, 2018. "A framework for cultural heritage management and research: the Cancellara case study," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 576-582, November.
    2. Lucia Saganeiti & Antonella Favale & Angela Pilogallo & Francesco Scorza & Beniamino Murgante, 2018. "Assessing Urban Fragmentation at Regional Scale Using Sprinkling Indexes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Tiechou Shi & Xiubin Li & Liangjie Xin & Xiaohong Xu, 2016. "Analysis of Farmland Abandonment at Parcel Level: A Case Study in the Mountainous Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Carolina Perpina Castillo & Boyan Kavalov & Ricardo Ribeiro Barranco & Vasco Diogo & Chris Jacobs-Crisioni & Filipe Batista e Silva & Claudia Baranzelli & Carlo Lavalle, 2018. "Territorial Fact and Trends in the EU Rural Areas within 2015-2030," JRC Research Reports JRC114016, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Cosimo A. Picuno & Ivan Laković & Demetrios Roubis & Pietro Picuno & Aleksandra Kapetanović, 2017. "Analysis of the Characteristics of Traditional Rural Constructions for Animal Corrals in the Adriatic-Ionian Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Andreas Haller & Oliver Bender, 2018. "Among rewilding mountains: grassland conservation and abandoned settlements in the Northern Apennines," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 1068-1084, November.
    7. Marco Parlavecchia & Simone Pascuzzi & Alexandros Sotirios Anifantis & Francesco Santoro & Giuseppe Ruggiero, 2019. "Use of GIS to Evaluate Minor Rural Buildings Distribution Compared to the Communication Routes in a Part of the Apulian Territory (Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Ana Maria-Irina, 2017. "Tourism industry in the new Europe: trends, policies and challenges," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Paradigm, vol. 11(1), pages 493-503, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Cillis & Dina Statuto & Pietro Picuno, 2021. "Historical GIS as a Tool for Monitoring, Preserving and Planning Forest Landscape: A Case Study in a Mediterranean Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Zhonglei Yu & Lei Liu & Hua Zhang & Jinshe Liang, 2017. "Exploring the Factors Driving Seasonal Farmland Abandonment: A Case Study at the Regional Level in Hunan Province, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Julia Weiss & Livio Ferrante & Mariano Soler-Porta, 2021. "There Is No Place like Home! How Willing Are Young Adults to Move to Find a Job?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Bernardino Romano & Lorena Fiorini & Alessandro Marucci, 2019. "Italy without Urban ‘Sprinkling’. A Uchronia for a Country that Needs a Retrofit of Its Urban and Landscape Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Mara Balestrieri & Amedeo Ganciu, 2018. "Landscape Changes in Rural Areas: A Focus on Sardinian Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Giuseppe La Verde & Vittoria D’Avino & Carlo Sabbarese & Fabrizio Ambrosino & Vincenzo Roca & Adelaide Raulo & Mariagabriella Pugliese, 2020. "Radiation Protection Legislation and Sustainable Development of a Rural Green Tuff Village of Ischia Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Janus, Jaroslaw & Markuszewska, Iwona, 2019. "Forty years later: Assessment of the long-lasting effectiveness of land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 22-31.
    8. Beniamino Murgante & Giuseppe Borruso & Ginevra Balletto & Paolo Castiglia & Marco Dettori, 2020. "Why Italy First? Health, Geographical and Planning Aspects of the COVID-19 Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-44, June.
    9. Xue Wang, 2022. "Changes in Cultivated Land Loss and Landscape Fragmentation in China from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Fanya Qin & Katsue Fukamachi & Shozo Shibata, 2022. "Land-Use/Landscape Pattern Changes and Related Environmental Driving Forces in a Dong Ethnic Minority Village in Southwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Raju Rai & Yili Zhang & Basanta Paudel & Narendra Raj Khanal, 2019. "Status of Farmland Abandonment and Its Determinants in the Transboundary Gandaki River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Dimitris Goussios & Ioannis Faraslis, 2024. "Navigating the Past through an Interactive Geovisualisation-Driven Methodology: Locating a 15th–19th Century Paddy Field as a Source of Agro-Ecological Knowledge (Thessaly, Greece)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Uttam Khanal, 2018. "Why are farmers keeping cultivatable lands fallow even though there is food scarcity in Nepal?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(3), pages 603-614, June.
    14. Yuhan Wang & Chenyujing Yang & Yuanyuan Zhang & Yongji Xue, 2023. "Mountainous Areas: Alleviating the Shortage of Cultivated Land Caused by Changing Dietary Structure in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Sangay Wangchuk & Jennifer Bond & Rik Thwaites & Max Finlayson, 2023. "Exploring Human–Wildlife Conflict and Implications for Food Self-Sufficiency in Bhutan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Urbieta, Pablo & Fernandez, Emilio & Ramos, Luís & Méndez Martínez, Gonzalo & Bento, Ricardo, 2019. "A land-cover based urban dispersion indicator suitable for highly dispersed, discontinuously artificialized territories: The case of continental Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 92-103.
    17. Ronchi, Silvia & Pontarollo, Nicola & Serpieri, Carolina, 2021. "Clustering the built form at LAU2 level for addressing sustainable policies: Insights from the Belgium case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. George Martinidis & Muluken Elias Adamseged & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Yannis Fallas & Angeliki Foutri & Philipp Grundmann & Karen Hamann & Stanislaw Minta & Nikolaos Ntavos & Tora Råberg & Silvia Russo & , 2021. "How Clusters Create Shared Value in Rural Areas: An Examination of Six Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Michał Sobala, 2020. "Mountain Meadows and Glades of the Carpathians—Type or Element of Landscape? The Problem of Delimitation and Typology of Mountain Pasture Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Francesco Scorza & Giovanni Fortunato & Raffaella Carbone & Beniamino Murgante & Piergiuseppe Pontrandolfi, 2021. "Increasing Urban Walkability through Citizens’ Participation Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:4-:d:299091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.