IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11174-d653000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Death Reflection and Employee Work Behavior in the COVID-19 New Normal Time: The Role of Duty Orientation and Work Orientation

Author

Listed:
  • Shilong Wei

    (School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Yuting He

    (School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Wenxia Zhou

    (School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • József Popp

    (John von Neumann University, National Bank of Hungary, Research Center, 6000 Kecskemét, Hungary
    College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Judit Oláh

    (College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
    Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a destructive affair for both workplace and community. However, with the strengthen of global anti-pandemic measures, COVID-19 becomes the norm and there is an increased trend for people to reflect on life or death. Moreover, regardless of its facilitating role in advancing organizational behavior (OB) study, very few studies empirically examine the effects of death reflection in the work domain. Drawing on the generativity theory, we identify how death reflection influences employees’ in-role and extra-role performance under the COVID-19 pandemic. A longitudinal study is performed by using multi-source data from 387 employees in China. Our results reveal that the COVID-19-triggered death reflection is associated with the stronger in-role performance and organizational citizenship behaviors. We find that duty orientation is the mechanism that can explain the effects of the COVID-19-triggered death reflection on employees’ work behaviors. Furthermore, employees who reflect on death with high (vs. low) career and calling orientations tend to have higher in-role and extra-role performance, while employees who reflect on death with low (vs. high) job orientation are likely to have lower in-role and extra-role performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Shilong Wei & Yuting He & Wenxia Zhou & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2021. "Death Reflection and Employee Work Behavior in the COVID-19 New Normal Time: The Role of Duty Orientation and Work Orientation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11174-:d:653000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathan Eva & Alexander Newman & Qing Miao & Dan Wang & Brian Cooper, 2020. "Antecedents of Duty Orientation and Follower Work Behavior: The Interactive Effects of Perceived Organizational Support and Ethical Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 627-639, January.
    2. Hannah, Sean T. & Jennings, Peter L. & Bluhm, Dustin & Peng, Ann Chunyan & Schaubroeck, John M., 2014. "Duty orientation: Theoretical development and preliminary construct testing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 220-238.
    3. Sherry E. Moss & Meng Song & Sean T. Hannah & Zhen Wang & John J. Sumanth, 2020. "The Duty to Improve Oneself: How Duty Orientation Mediates the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Followers’ Feedback-Seeking and Feedback-Avoiding Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 615-631, September.
    4. George Lan & Chike Okechuku & He Zhang & Jianan Cao, 2013. "Impact of Job Satisfaction and Personal Values on the Work Orientation of Chinese Accounting Practitioners," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(4), pages 627-640, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monica Ioana Burcă-Voicu & Romana Emilia Cramarenco & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Investigating Learners’ Teaching Format Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Investigation on an Emerging Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DeConinck, James & Carnes, Drew & DeConinck, Mary Beth, 2021. "Antecedents and Outcomes of Duty Orientation Among Salespeople," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(2), pages 100-114, November.
    2. Rai, Arpana & Kim, Minseo & Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2023. "Meaningful work from ethics perspective: Examination of ethical antecedents and outcomes of meaningful work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Curtis L. Wesley & Gregory W. Martin & Darryl B. Rice & Connor J. Lubojacky, 2022. "Do the Right Thing: The Imprinting of Deonance at the Upper Echelons," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 187-213, September.
    4. Jinan Fattah & Mehmet Yesiltas & Tarik Atan, 2022. "The Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Participative Decision-Making on Employee Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    5. Staelens, Lotte & Louche, Céline & D’Haese, Marijke, 2014. "Understanding job satisfaction in a labor intensive sector: Empirical evidence from the Ethiopian cut flower industry," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182815, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Guillermina Tormo-Carbó & Zeena Mardawi & Elies Seguí-Mas, 2024. "Should I Stay or Should I Go? Auditor Ethical Conflict and Turnover Intention," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 335-350, October.
    7. Michael Asiedu Gyensare & Samuel Adomako & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2024. "Green HRM practices, employee well‐being, and sustainable work behavior: Examining the moderating role of resource commitment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3129-3141, May.
    8. Yuliya Frolova & Monowar Mahmood, 2019. "Variations in employee duty orientation: impact of personality, leadership styles and corporate culture," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(4), pages 423-444, December.
    9. Sabeen Hussain Bhatti & Kamran Iqbal & Gabriele Santoro & Fabio Rizzato, 2022. "The impact of corporate social responsibility directed toward employees on contextual performance in the banking sector: A serial model of perceived organizational support and affective organizational," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1980-1994, November.
    10. Maria Saleem & Faisal Qadeer & Faisal Mahmood & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Heesup Han, 2020. "Ethical Leadership and Employee Green Behavior: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Ponmythili Muppidathi & Venkat R. Krishnan, 2021. "Transformational Leadership and Follower’s Perceived Group Cohesiveness: Mediating Role of Follower’s Karma-yoga," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 269-285, May.
    12. Weichun Zhu & Xiaoming Zheng & Hongwei He & Gang Wang & Xi Zhang, 2019. "Ethical Leadership with Both “Moral Person” and “Moral Manager” Aspects: Scale Development and Cross-Cultural Validation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 547-565, August.
    13. Nathan Eva & Alexander Newman & Qing Miao & Dan Wang & Brian Cooper, 2020. "Antecedents of Duty Orientation and Follower Work Behavior: The Interactive Effects of Perceived Organizational Support and Ethical Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 627-639, January.
    14. Lotte Staelens & Sam Desiere & Céline Louche & Marijke D’haese, 2018. "Predicting job satisfaction and workers’ intentions to leave at the bottom of the high value agricultural chain: Evidence from the Ethiopian cut flower industry," Post-Print hal-04352116, HAL.
    15. Georgiadou, Andri & Amari, Amina & Swalhi, Abdelaziz & Hofaidhllaoui, Mahrane, 2024. "How does perceived organizational support improve expatriates' outcomes during global crises? The mediating role of the ethical organizational climate in global organizations," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    16. Badghish, Saeed & Shaik, Aqueeb Sohail & Sahore, Nidhi & Srivastava, Shalini & Masood, Ayesha, 2024. "Can transactional use of AI-controlled voice assistants for service delivery pickup pace in the near future? A social learning theory (SLT) perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Michaelson, Christopher, 2015. "Accounting for meaning: On §22 of David Foster Wallace's The Pale King," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 54-64.
    18. Christian Voegtlin & Colina Frisch & Andreas Walther & Pascale Schwab, 2020. "Theoretical Development and Empirical Examination of a Three-Roles Model of Responsible Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 411-431, December.
    19. Kamran Iqbal & Muhammad Naveed & Qazi Abdul Subhan & Tehreem Fatima & Saeed T. Alshahrani, 2022. "When Self-Sacrificial Leaders Induce Employees’ Citizenship Behaviors? Uncovering the Nexus of Psychological Empowerment and Psychological Well-Being," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    20. Jochen Theis & Marvin Nipper, 2021. "The Impact of Executives’ Gender, Financial Incentives, and Shareholder Pressure on Corporate Social and Ecological Investments," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 307-338, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11174-:d:653000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.