IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10089-d631958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of Energy and Media Demand of Beverage Bottling Plants by Automatic Model Generation

Author

Listed:
  • Raik Martin Bär

    (Chair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Michael Zeilmann

    (Chair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Christoph Nophut

    (Chair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Joachim Kleinert

    (SimPlan AG, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Karsten Beyer

    (SimPlan AG, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Tobias Voigt

    (Chair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany)

Abstract

Facing environmental challenges, high energy costs and a growing public awareness, the global brewing industry is increasingly publishing ambitious targets toward a more sustainable production. Small and medium-sized enterprises of the brewing and beverage industry cannot ensure energy and media efficiency mainly due to capital and knowledge inadequacy. This article addresses this problem and presents a pragmatic method to determine the energy and media demand. Accordingly, a modeling editor as well as a standardized data structure and automatic simulation parameter determination tools were developed to implement the method. A given production plant can be modeled with adequate details using the presented editor. Based on a configuration file, a holistic simulation model can be generated automatically in a simulation environment. A beverage bottling plant was studied, and the necessary datasets were obtained for implementing the proposed editor and, thereby, the method. It was confirmed that the simulated values of electrical energy and compressed air consumption match the measured empirical data. The measures to increase energy and media efficiency were also found effective. Using the presented method, enterprises of the brewing and beverage industry can easily uncover avenues for potential savings, test the effectiveness of optimization strategies, and substantiate possible investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Raik Martin Bär & Michael Zeilmann & Christoph Nophut & Joachim Kleinert & Karsten Beyer & Tobias Voigt, 2021. "Simulation of Energy and Media Demand of Beverage Bottling Plants by Automatic Model Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10089-:d:631958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diomidis Spinellis & Chrissoleon Papadopoulos, 2000. "A simulated annealing approach for buffer allocation in reliable production lines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 373-384, January.
    2. Thollander, Patrik & Backlund, Sandra & Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico, 2013. "Beyond barriers – A case study on driving forces for improved energy efficiency in the foundry industries in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 636-643.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Stefana & Paola Cocca & Filippo Marciano & Diana Rossi & Giuseppe Tomasoni, 2019. "A Review of Energy and Environmental Management Practices in Cast Iron Foundries to Increase Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Gómez-Calvet, Roberto & Conesa, David & Gómez-Calvet, Ana Rosa & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2014. "Energy efficiency in the European Union: What can be learned from the joint application of directional distance functions and slacks-based measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 137-154.
    3. Xiangmeng Huang & Shuai Yang & Xiaolan Shi, 2021. "How Corporate Social Responsibility and External Stakeholder Concerns Affect Green Supply Chain Cooperation among Manufacturers: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    5. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & Farné, Stefano, 2016. "Barriers, drivers and decision-making process for industrial energy efficiency: A broad study among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1537-1551.
    6. Federico Nuñez-Piña & Joselito Medina-Marin & Juan Carlos Seck-Tuoh-Mora & Norberto Hernandez-Romero & Eva Selene Hernandez-Gress, 2018. "Modeling of Throughput in Production Lines Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, January.
    7. Jan Stede, 2016. "Bridging the Industrial Energy Efficiency Gap: Assessing the Evidence from the Italian White Certificate Scheme," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1565, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Qin, Quande & Liang, Fuqi & Li, Li & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Selection of energy performance contracting business models: A behavioral decision-making approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 422-433.
    9. Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Thyholdt, Sverre Braathen, 2019. "Absorptive capacity and energy efficiency in manufacturing firms – An empirical analysis in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 978-990.
    10. Noor Jalo & Ida Johansson & Mariana Andrei & Therese Nehler & Patrik Thollander, 2021. "Barriers to and Drivers of Energy Management in Swedish SMEs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Werner König & Sabine Löbbe & Stefan Büttner & Christian Schneider, 2020. "Establishing Energy Efficiency—Drivers for Energy Efficiency in German Manufacturing Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-31, October.
    12. Mette Talseth Solnørdal & Lene Foss, 2018. "Closing the Energy Efficiency Gap—A Systematic Review of Empirical Articles on Drivers to Energy Efficiency in Manufacturing Firms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, February.
    13. Pusnik, Matevz & Al-Mansour, Fouad & Sucic, Boris & Gubina, A.F., 2016. "Gap analysis of industrial energy management systems in Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 41-49.
    14. May, Gökan & Stahl, Bojan & Taisch, Marco, 2016. "Energy management in manufacturing: Toward eco-factories of the future – A focus group study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 628-638.
    15. Bartlomiej Gawin & Bartosz Marcinkowski, 2020. "Setting up Energy Efficiency Management in Companies: Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Petroleum Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Herrera, Bernardo & Amell, Andrés & Chejne, Farid & Cacua, Karen & Manrique, Raiza & Henao, Wilson & Vallejo, Gabriel, 2017. "Use of thermal energy and analysis of barriers to the implementation of thermal efficiency measures in cement production: Exploratory study in Colombia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1047-1058.
    17. Leonardo Leoni & Alessandra Cantini & Filippo De Carlo & Marcello Salvio & Chiara Martini & Claudia Toro & Fabrizio Martini, 2021. "Energy-Saving Technology Opportunities and Investments of the Italian Foundry Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    18. Gaigalis, Vygandas & Skema, Romualdas, 2015. "Analysis of the fuel and energy transition in Lithuanian industry and its sustainable development in 2005–2013 in compliance with the EU policy and strategy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 265-279.
    19. António da Silva Gonçalves, Vítor & Mil-Homens dos Santos, Feliz José, 2019. "Energy management system ISO 50001:2011 and energy management for sustainable development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Du, Huibin & Matisoff, Daniel C. & Wang, Yangyang & Liu, Xi, 2016. "Understanding drivers of energy efficiency changes in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1196-1206.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10089-:d:631958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.