IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9713-d625072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Fashion in Poland—Too Early or Too Late?

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Popowska

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Sinkiewicz

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland)

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the concept of sustainable fashion from the Polish consumer’s perspective. The aim of this research is to investigate how Polish fashion consumers approach the concepts of sustainability, such as organic, fair-trade, and carbon emissions. Exploring the experience of the Polish consumption context provides a richer understanding of the evolution of fashion sustainability concepts in this and similar countries. The research methods applied comprise the literature review, including the theoretical and empirical items, and the survey conducted among Polish fashion consumers. According to our findings, Polish consumers declare caring more about the general environment but do not pay attention to sustainable development in the clothing industry. It is also worth noting that Poles, compared to those in other countries, have an unfavourable opinion of their own nation on the approach to sustainable development in the garment industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Popowska & Aleksandra Sinkiewicz, 2021. "Sustainable Fashion in Poland—Too Early or Too Late?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9713-:d:625072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9713/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9713/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrizia Gazzola & Enrica Pavione & Roberta Pezzetti & Daniele Grechi, 2020. "Trends in the Fashion Industry. The Perception of Sustainability and Circular Economy: A Gender/Generation Quantitative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Idiano D’Adamo & Gianluca Lupi, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience after COVID-19: A Circular Premium in the Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-5, February.
    3. James Richardson, 1996. "Vertical Integration and Rapid Response in Fashion Apparel," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 400-412, August.
    4. Hudson, Laurel Anderson & Ozanne, Julie L, 1988. "Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 508-521, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valerio Schiaroli & Rosa Maria Dangelico & Luca Fraccascia, 2025. "Mapping sustainable options in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review and a future research agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 431-464, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prisco, Anna & Ricciardi, Irene & Percuoco, Martina & Basile, Vincenzo, 2025. "Sustainability-driven fashion: Unpacking generation Z’s second-hand clothing purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Ahmed Ashraf Zaidi & Rahul Chandra, 2025. "A Study on Indian Consumers’ Willingness to Participate in Circular Fashion Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) Approach of Multi-criteria Decision Making and Binomial Logistics Regression," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 3401-3429, August.
    4. Cappetta, Rossella & Cillo, Paola & Ponti, Anna, 2006. "Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1273-1290, November.
    5. Alroomi, Azzam & Karamatzanis, Georgios & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos & Tilba, Anna & Xiao, Shujun, 2022. "Fathoming empirical forecasting competitions’ winners," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1519-1525.
    6. Francisco J. Conejo & Lawrence F. Cunningham & Clifford E. Young, 2020. "Revisiting the Brand Luxury Index: new empirical evidence and future directions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 108-122, January.
    7. Myriam Caratù & Valerio Brescia & Ilaria Pigliautile & Paolo Biancone, 2023. "Assessing Energy Communities’ Awareness on Social Media with a Content and Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Bryan Hochstein & Willy Bolander & Ronald Goldsmith & Christopher R. Plouffe, 2019. "Adapting influence approaches to informed consumers in high-involvement purchases: are salespeople really doomed?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 118-137, January.
    9. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Suhaiza Zailani, 2022. "Barriers to Blockchain Adoption in the Circular Economy: A Fuzzy Delphi and Best-Worst Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Eeva-Liisa Oikarinen, 2023. "The Boundaries of a Small Company’s Human Voice: Insights into Dark Humour in Internet Recruitment Advertising," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 223-241, August.
    11. Daugherty, Terry & Hoffman, Ernest & Kennedy, Kathleen, 2016. "Research in reverse: Ad testing using an inductive consumer neuroscience approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3168-3176.
    12. Filipe M. Santos & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2005. "Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 491-508, October.
    13. Todeva, Emanuela & Fu, Yan, 2010. "Multinational investment projects in the petrochemical industry in China," MPRA Paper 67615, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Swikriti Khadke & Pragya Gupta & Shanmukh Rachakunta & Chandreswar Mahata & Suma Dawn & Mohit Sharma & Deepak Verma & Aniruddha Pradhan & Ambati Mounika Sai Krishna & Seeram Ramakrishna & Sabyasachi C, 2021. "Efficient Plastic Recycling and Remolding Circular Economy Using the Technology of Trust–Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Armatas, Christopher A. & Borrie, William T., 2025. "A pragmatist ecological economics - Normative foundations and a framework for actionable knowledge," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Jack R. Meredith, 2001. "Reconsidering the Philosophical Basis of OR/MS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 325-333, June.
    17. Idiano D’Adamo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Maria Sonia Medina-Salgado & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "E-Commerce Calls for Cyber-Security and Sustainability: How European Citizens Look for a Trusted Online Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Roberta Gabriela Basílio & Mateus Canniatti Ponchio & Rafaela Almeida Cordeiro, 2024. "Examining unethical sales practices in retail banking: a hermeneutic analysis of employee perceptions in Brazil," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 1304-1317, December.
    19. Sher Jahan Khan & Saeed Badghish & Puneet Kaur & Rajat Sharma & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "What motivates the purchasing of green apparel products? A systematic review and future research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4183-4201, November.
    20. Kate Robinson & Bernard McKenna & David Rooney, 2022. "The Relationship of Risk to Rules, Values, Virtues, and Moral Complexity: What We can Learn from the Moral Struggles of Military Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 749-766, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9713-:d:625072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.