IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9118-d614478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilisation of CO 2 from Sodium Bicarbonate to Produce Chlorella vulgaris Biomass in Tubular Photobioreactors for Biofuel Purposes

Author

Listed:
  • Patryk Ratomski

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Adam Koniuszy

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Pawla VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

Microalgae are one of the most promising sources of renewable substrates used for energy purposes. Biomass and components accumulated in their cells can be used to produce a wide range of biofuels, but the profitability of their production is still not at a sufficient level. Significant costs are generated, i.a., during the cultivation of microalgae, and are connected with providing suitable culture conditions. This study aims to evaluate the possibility of using sodium bicarbonate as an inexpensive alternative CO 2 source in the culture of Chlorella vulgaris , promoting not only the increase of microalgae biomass production but also lipid accumulation. The study was carried out at technical scale using 100 L photobioreactors. Gravimetric and spectrophotometric methods were used to evaluate biomass growth. Lipid content was determined using a mixture of chloroform and methanol according to the Blight and Dyer method, while the carbon content and CO 2 fixation rate were measured according to the Walkley and Black method. In batch culture, even a small addition of bicarbonate resulted in a significant ( p ≤ 0.05) increase in the amount of biomass, productivity and optical density compared to non-bicarbonate cultures. At 2.0 g∙L –1 , biomass content was 572 ± 4 mg·L −1 , the maximum productivity was 7.0 ± 1.0 mg·L –1 ·d –1 , and the optical density was 0.181 ± 0.00. There was also an increase in the lipid content (26 ± 4%) and the carbon content in the biomass (1322 ± 0.062 g∙dw –1 ), as well as a higher rate of carbon dioxide fixation (0.925 ± 0.073 g·L –1 ·d –1 ). The cultivation of microalgae in enlarged scale photobioreactors provides a significant technological challenge. The obtained results can be useful to evaluate the efficiency of biomass and valuable cellular components production in closed systems realized at industrial scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Patryk Ratomski & Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Adam Koniuszy, 2021. "Utilisation of CO 2 from Sodium Bicarbonate to Produce Chlorella vulgaris Biomass in Tubular Photobioreactors for Biofuel Purposes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9118-:d:614478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Adam Koniuszy & Małgorzata Gałczyńska, 2020. "Sustainable Production of Monoraphidium Microalgae Biomass as a Source of Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Collet, Pierre & Lardon, Laurent & Hélias, Arnaud & Bricout, Stéphanie & Lombaert-Valot, Isabelle & Perrier, Béatrice & Lépine, Olivier & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Bernard, Olivier, 2014. "Biodiesel from microalgae – Life cycle assessment and recommendations for potential improvements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 525-533.
    3. Evan Stephens & Ian Ross & Jan H. Mussgnug & Liam Wagner & Michael A. Borowitzka & Clemens Posten & Olaf Kruse & Ben Hankamer, 2010. "Future prospects of microalgal biofuel production systems," Energy Economics and Management Group Working Papers 7-2010, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    4. Yuan, Chuan & Wang, Shuang & Cao, Bin & Hu, Yamin & Abomohra, Abd El-Fatah & Wang, Qian & Qian, Lili & Liu, Lu & Liu, Xinlin & He, Zhixia & Sun, Chaoqun & Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Bo, 2019. "Optimization of hydrothermal co-liquefaction of seaweeds with lignocellulosic biomass: Merging 2nd and 3rd generation feedstocks for enhanced bio-oil production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 413-422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Nápoles-Armenta & Itzel Celeste Romero-Soto & Luis Samaniego-Moreno & Lourdes Mariana Díaz-Tenorio & Luis Alonso Leyva Soto & Celia De La Mora-Orozco & Rafael González Pérez & Edgardo Martínez-Or, 2025. "Advanced Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Bioproduct Generation via Optimized Autotrophic and Mixotrophic Microalgal Cultivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Samantaray, Shilalipi & Koley, Shankha & Tripathy, Baishnab C. & Mallick, Nirupama, 2025. "Contiguous supplementation of bicarbonate and carbon dioxide to improve carbon utilization efficiency and biodiesel production from a single-cell alga Chlamydomonasreinhardtii," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalpesh K. Sharma & Holger Schuhmann & Peer M. Schenk, 2012. "High Lipid Induction in Microalgae for Biodiesel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Chung, Young-Soo & Lee, Jin-Woo & Chung, Chung-Han, 2017. "Molecular challenges in microalgae towards cost-effective production of quality biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 139-144.
    3. Kim, Seong Ju & Um, Byung Hwan, 2020. "Effect of thermochemically fractionation before hydrothermal liquefaction of herbaceous biomass on biocrude characteristics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 612-622.
    4. Lakshmikandan, M. & Murugesan, A.G. & Wang, Shuang & El-Fatah Abomohra, Abd, 2021. "Optimization of acid hydrolysis on the green seaweed Valoniopsis pachynema and approach towards mixotrophic microalgal biomass and lipid production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1052-1061.
    5. Yang, Tianhua & Du, Chongzhen & Li, Bingshuo & Liu, Zheng & Kai, Xingping, 2022. "Influence of alkali and alkaline earth metals on the hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulosic model compounds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1038-1048.
    6. Ana F. Esteves & Eva M. Salgado & José C. M. Pires, 2022. "Recent Advances in Microalgal Biorefineries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-4, August.
    7. Rawat, I. & Ranjith Kumar, R. & Mutanda, T. & Bux, F., 2013. "Biodiesel from microalgae: A critical evaluation from laboratory to large scale production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 444-467.
    8. Cerón-García, M.C. & Macías-Sánchez, M.D. & Sánchez-Mirón, A. & García-Camacho, F. & Molina-Grima, E., 2013. "A process for biodiesel production involving the heterotrophic fermentation of Chlorella protothecoides with glycerol as the carbon source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 341-349.
    9. Chen, Jiaxin & Li, Ji & Dong, Wenyi & Zhang, Xiaolei & Tyagi, Rajeshwar D. & Drogui, Patrick & Surampalli, Rao Y., 2018. "The potential of microalgae in biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 336-346.
    10. Naveed, Muhammad Hamza & Khan, Muhammad Nouman Aslam & Mukarram, Muhammad & Naqvi, Salman Raza & Abdullah, Abdullah & Haq, Zeeshan Ul & Ullah, Hafeez & Mohamadi, Hamad Al, 2024. "Cellulosic biomass fermentation for biofuel production: Review of artificial intelligence approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    11. Marcin Dębowski & Izabela Świca & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Zieliński, 2022. "Large Scale Microalgae Biofuel Technology—Development Perspectives in Light of the Barriers and Limitations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Chamkalani, A. & Zendehboudi, S. & Rezaei, N. & Hawboldt, K., 2020. "A critical review on life cycle analysis of algae biodiesel: current challenges and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Telles, E.C. & Yang, S. & Vargas, J.V.C. & Dias, F.G. & Ordonez, J.C. & Mariano, A.B. & Chagas, M.B. & Davis, T., 2018. "A genset and mini-photobioreactor association for CO2 capturing, enhanced microalgae growth and multigeneration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 985-994.
    14. Guanyu Zhang & Kejie Wang & Quan Liu & Lujia Han & Xuesong Zhang, 2022. "A Comprehensive Hydrothermal Co-Liquefaction of Diverse Biowastes for Energy-Dense Biocrude Production: Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Tran, Quoc Khanh & Salam, Muhammad Abdus & Ho, Phuoc Hoang & Le, Huy Xuan & Kugge, Christian & Creaser, Derek & Olsson, Louise, 2025. "One-pot depolymerization of forest residues to potential aviation fuel over hybrid zeolite – N-doped activated carbon supported NiMo catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    16. Adenle, Ademola A. & Haslam, Gareth E. & Lee, Lisa, 2013. "Global assessment of research and development for algae biofuel production and its potential role for sustainable development in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 182-195.
    17. Benjamin W. Portner & Antonio Valente & Sandy Guenther, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Combined Animal Fodder and Fuel Production from Microalgal Biomass," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Chen, Wei & Ma, Lin & Zhou, Peng-peng & Zhu, Yuan-min & Wang, Xiao-peng & Luo, Xin-an & Bao, Zhen-dong & Yu, Long-jiang, 2015. "A novel feedstock for biodiesel production: The application of palmitic acid from Schizochytrium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 128-138.
    19. Ratha, Sachitra Kumar & Renuka, Nirmal & Abunama, Taher & Rawat, Ismail & Bux, Faizal, 2022. "Hydrothermal liquefaction of algal feedstocks: The effect of biomass characteristics and extraction solvents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Habchi, A. & Hartiti, B. & Labrim, H. & Thevenin, P. & Ntsoenzok, E., 2025. "Amplification of green hydrogen production using an innovative new hybrid semi-transparent photovoltaic solar panel integrated with tubular thermoelectric generators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9118-:d:614478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.