IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8512-d604914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Trends in the Crop Production in Slovakia after Accession to the European Union—Case Study, Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Némethová

    (Department of Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Natural Science, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Ľubomír Rybanský

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Science, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia)

Abstract

The development of agriculture in Slovakia in the last three decades has been influenced by two events: the transformation of agriculture after 1989 and Slovakia’s accession to the European Union in 2004. In this paper, we analyze the effects of Slovakia’s accession to the European Union on the development and structure of crop production. The aim of the paper was to identify connections, parallels and differences between the developments of the sown areas of the most important crops at the level of Slovakia and its regions in the period 2004–2020. Cluster analysis based on the similarity of the development of the sown areas divided the crops into four clusters (cereals; sugar-beet; oilseeds, multiannual fodder crops, maize; legumes, vegetables, potatoes). Multivariate analyses of the time series of sown areas also revealed similarities and differences between the regions of Slovakia. The results of the analysis point to regional differentiation and the identify two clusters. The first cluster comprises the Nitra and Trnava Regions, while the second cluster consists of the remaining six regions. The study has shown that changes in the agrarian sector after 2004, conditioned by Slovakia’s accession to the European Union, have been reflected in changes in the area and structure of cultivated crops, and in the differentiated development of sown areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Némethová & Ľubomír Rybanský, 2021. "Development Trends in the Crop Production in Slovakia after Accession to the European Union—Case Study, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8512-:d:604914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8512/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8512/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Latruffe, Laure & Fogarasi, József & Desjeux, Yann, 2012. "Efficiency, productivity and technology comparison for farms in Central and Western Europe: The case of field crop and dairy farming in Hungary and France," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 264-278.
    2. Grešlová, Petra & Štych, Přemysl & Salata, Tomasz & Hernik, Józef & Knížková, Ivana & Bičík, Ivan & Jeleček, Leoš & Prus, Barbara & Noszczyk, Tomasz, 2019. "Agroecosystem energy metabolism in Czechia and Poland in the two decades after the fall of communism: From a centrally planned system to market oriented mode of production," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 807-820.
    3. Nicholas A. Lancaster & Ariana P. Torres, 2019. "Investigating the Drivers of Farm Diversification Among U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Jezierska-Thöle, Aleksandra & Rudnicki, Roman & Kluba, Mieczysław, 2016. "Development of energy crops cultivation for biomass production in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 534-545.
    5. Vaida Sapolaite & Armands Veveris & Artiom Volkov & Virginia Namiotko, 2019. "Dynamics in the Agricultural Sectors of the Baltic States: the Effects of the Common Agricultural Policy and Challenges for the Future," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(4), pages 211-223.
    6. Pavel Kotyza & Josef Slaboch, 2014. "Food Self Sufficiency in Selected Crops in the Czech Republic and Poland," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(6), pages 1329-1341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jana Némethová & Hana Svobodová & Antonín Věžník, 2022. "Changes in Spatial Distribution of Arable Land, Crop Production and Yield of Selected Crops in the EU Countries after 2004," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Jana Némethová & Katarína Vilinová, 2022. "Changes in the Structure of Crop Production in Slovakia after 2004 Using an Example of Selected Crops," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Ivana Blažková & Veronika Svatošová & Gabriela Chmelíková & Vojtěch Tamáš & Eliška Svobodová & Libor Grega & Simona Miškolci & Jakub Piecuch & Apolka Ujj & Daniela Hupková & Jacek Puchała & István Baz, 2023. "The effects of COVID-19 crisis on small family farms: Empirical evidence from Visegrad countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(9), pages 366-374.
    4. Bilenko, Yuriy, 2022. "Labor productivity in the agriculture, structural shifts and economic growth in the Central and Eastern European countries," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jana Némethová & Hana Svobodová & Antonín Věžník, 2022. "Changes in Spatial Distribution of Arable Land, Crop Production and Yield of Selected Crops in the EU Countries after 2004," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Némethová Jana & Svobodová Hana & Křejčí Ondřej & Věžník Antonín, 2020. "Development of crop production in the Slovakia and Czechia after the year 2004 in comparison with V4 countries," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 50(50), pages 7-22, October.
    3. Marek Helis & Maria Strzelczyk & Wojciech Golimowski & Aleksandra Steinhoff-Wrześniewska & Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska & Małgorzata Hawrot-Paw & Adam Koniuszy & Marek Hryniewicz, 2021. "Biomass Potential of the Marginal Land of the Polish Sudetes Mountain Range," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki & Łukasz Wiśniewski & Marta Gwiaździńska-Goraj & Mirosław Biczkowski, 2021. "The Agri-Environment-Climate Measure as an Element of the Bioeconomy in Poland—A Spatial Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Veronika Fenyves & Tibor Tarnóczi & Zoltán Bács & Dóra Kerezsi & Péter Bajnai & Mihály Szoboszlai, 2022. "Financial efficiency analysis of Hungarian agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(11), pages 413-426.
    7. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Harms, Sören Guntram, 2019. "Performance comparison of management groups under centralised management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 845-854.
    8. Jan K. Kazak & Joanna A. Kamińska & Rafał Madej & Marta Bochenkiewicz, 2020. "Where Renewable Energy Sources Funds are Invested? Spatial Analysis of Energy Production Potential and Public Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Śliz, Maciej & Wilk, Małgorzata, 2020. "A comprehensive investigation of hydrothermal carbonization: Energy potential of hydrochar derived from Virginia mallow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 942-950.
    10. Radovan Savov & Juraj Cheben & Drahoslav Lancaric & Roman Serencéš, 2017. "MBNQA Approach in Quality Management Supporting Sustainable Business Performance in Agribusiness," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Krystyna Kurowska & Renata Marks-Bielska & Stanisław Bielski & Audrius Aleknavičius & Cezary Kowalczyk, 2020. "Geographic Information Systems and the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Lajos Baráth & Imre Fertő & Heinrich Hockmann, 2020. "Technological Differences, Theoretical Consistency, and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Hungarian Crop-Producing Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Fang Yan & Kaili Xu & Deshun Li & Zhikai Cui, 2017. "A novel hazard assessment method for biomass gasification stations based on extended set pair analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Radha R. Ashrit, 2023. "Estimation of technical efficiency of Indian farms for major crops during 2013–2014 and 2017–2018: a stochastic Frontier production approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, February.
    15. Lancaric, Drahoslav & Tóth, Marián & Savov, Radovan, 2013. "Which legal form of agricultural firm based on return on equity should be preferred? A panel data analysis of Slovak agricultural firms," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 115(3), pages 1-2, December.
    16. Ang, Frederic & Oude Lansink, Alfons, 2014. "Dynamic profit inefficiency: a DEA application to Belgian dairy farms," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182649, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Paweł Dudziec & Michał Krzyżaniak & Ewelina Olba-Zięty, 2021. "Solid Biomass Energy Potential as a Development Opportunity for Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Michele Pezzagno & Anna Richiedei & Maurizio Tira, 2020. "Spatial Planning Policy for Sustainability: Analysis Connecting Land Use and GHG Emission in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Siyan Zeng & Fengwu Zhu & Fu Chen & Man Yu & Shaoliang Zhang & Yongjun Yang, 2018. "Assessing the Impacts of Land Consolidation on Agricultural Technical Efficiency of Producers: A Survey from Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Anita Konieczna & Kamil Roman & Monika Roman & Damian Śliwiński & Michał Roman, 2020. "Energy Efficiency of Maize Production Technology: Evidence from Polish Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8512-:d:604914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.