IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8335-d601707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Attack on the Separation of Powers? Strategic Climate Litigation in the Eyes of U.S. Judges

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmina Nedevska

    (Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, 752 38 Uppsala, Sweden)

Abstract

Climate change litigation has emerged as a powerful tool as societies steer towards sustainable development. Although the litigation mainly takes place in domestic courts, the implications can be seen as global as specific climate rulings influence courts across national borders. However, while the phenomenon of judicialization is well-known in the social sciences, relatively few have studied issues of legitimacy that arise as climate politics move into courts. A comparatively large part of climate cases have appeared in the United States. This article presents a research plan for a study of judges’ opinions and dissents in the United States, regarding the justiciability of strategic climate cases. The purpose is to empirically study how judges navigate a perceived normative conflict—between the litigation and an overarching ideal of separation of powers—in a system marked by checks and balances.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmina Nedevska, 2021. "An Attack on the Separation of Powers? Strategic Climate Litigation in the Eyes of U.S. Judges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-7, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8335-:d:601707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gustafson, Abel & Goldberg, Matthew H. & Kotcher, John E. & Rosenthal, Seth A. & Maibach, Edward W. & Ballew, Matthew T. & Leiserowitz, Anthony, 2020. "Republicans and Democrats differ in why they support renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Joana Setzer & Lisa C. Vanhala, 2019. "Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Szpak, 2020. "Arctic Athabaskan Council’s petition to the Inter-American Commission on human rights and climate change—business as usual or a breakthrough?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1575-1593, October.
    2. Serena Y. Kim & Koushik Ganesan & Princess Dickens & Soumya Panda, 2021. "Public Sentiment toward Solar Energy—Opinion Mining of Twitter Using a Transformer-Based Language Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Robert Huang & Matthew E. Kahn, 2024. "Do Red States Have a Comparative Advantage in Generating Green Power?," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 200-238.
    4. Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Christian Mumenthaler & Tobia Spampatti & Tobias Brosch, 2020. "Ideology as Filter: Motivated Information Processing and Decision-Making in the Energy Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Liliana Lizarazo-Rodriguez, 2021. "The UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and the Greening of Human Rights Litigation: Fishing in Fragmented Waters?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Dietz, Simon & Gardiner, Dan & Jahn, Valentin & Noels, Jolien, 2021. "How ambitious are oil and gas companies’ climate goals?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112536, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Olukorede Adewole, 2023. "CSR–brand relationship, brand positioning, and investment risks driven towards climate change mitigation and next perspectives emerging from: “Litigation, projections, pathway, and models”," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-53, January.
    8. Wimhurst, Joshua J. & Greene, J. Scott & Koch, Jennifer, 2023. "Predicting commercial wind farm site suitability in the conterminous United States using a logistic regression model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    9. Angela Maria D’Uggento & Alfonso Piscitelli & Nunziata Ribecco & Germana Scepi, 2023. "Perceived climate change risk and global green activism among young people," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(4), pages 1167-1195, October.
    10. Henry Jiménez Guanipa & Natalia Castro Niño & Wilfredo Robayo Galvis, 2020. "Emergencia climática : Prospectiva 2030 : XXI Jornadas de Derecho Constitucional. Constitucionalismo en transformación. Prospectiva 2030," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1273, October.
    11. Hermine Van Coppenolle & Mathieu Blondeel & Thijs Van de Graaf, 2023. "Reframing the climate debate: The origins and diffusion of net zero pledges," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 48-60, February.
    12. Dana R. Fisher & Sohana Nasrin, 2021. "Climate activism and its effects," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), January.
    13. Seline Keller & Basil Bornemann, 2021. "New Climate Activism between Politics and Law: Analyzing the Strategy of the KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 124-134.
    14. Daniel Rosenbloom & Adrian Rinscheid, 2020. "Deliberate decline: An emerging frontier for the study and practice of decarbonization," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(6), November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8335-:d:601707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.