IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7951-d595448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Allocation Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Scientific and Technological Resources in the Yangtze River Delta City Group

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhong H. Cao

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Jianxin X. You

    (School of Economics & Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yongjiang J. Shi

    (Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UK)

  • Wei Hu

    (School of Economics and Trade, Shanghai Urban Construction Vocational College, Shanghai 201999, China)

Abstract

Through the establishment of a comprehensive evaluation index system, this paper analyzes the allocation of science and technology resources in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from 2014 to 2020, evaluates the allocation efficiency of science and technology resources from the perspective of multi input and output, and understands the advantages and disadvantages of regional resource allocation. The research results show that: (1) under the guidance of the national strategic policy of actively promoting the development of world-class urban agglomerations, the allocation efficiency of science and technology resources in various provinces and cities of the Yangtze River Delta continues to optimize, and the allocation level of some regions shows a rapid development trend; (2) R&D personnel and R&D funds are the core factors that affect the efficiency of science and technology resource allocation; (3) the marketization of resource allocation is helpful to improve its allocation efficiency; and (4) improving the transformation rate of scientific and technological achievements, opening up the channel for innovative products, technologies, and services to enter the market, and enabling innovative enterprises to make profits can provide strong and lasting incentives for the improvement of scientific and technological resource allocation efficiency. Based on the research conclusions, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to improve the allocation efficiency of scientific and technological resources in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from the aspects of human resources and material resources, and provides a theoretical reference for the coordinated and sustainable development of the Yangtze River Delta City Group under the background of the implementation of the urban agglomeration strategy and the construction of a scientific and technological infrastructure platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhong H. Cao & Jianxin X. You & Yongjiang J. Shi & Wei Hu, 2021. "Research on the Allocation Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Scientific and Technological Resources in the Yangtze River Delta City Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7951-:d:595448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenfei Xia & Baizhou Li & Shi Yin, 2020. "Identification of Influencing Factors for Sustainable Development: Evaluation and Management of Regional Innovation Performance in Heilongjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-55, March.
    2. Ekboir, Javier M., 2003. "Research and technology policies in innovation systems: zero tillage in Brazil," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 573-586, April.
    3. Tianren Yang & Minghai Ye & Pei Pei & Yongjiang Shi & Haozhi Pan, 2019. "City Branding Evaluation as a Tool for Sustainable Urban Growth: A Framework and Lessons from the Yangtze River Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulo Figueiredo, 2014. "Technological Catch-up and Indigenous Institutional Infrastructures in Latecomer Natural Resource-related Industries: An Exploration of the Role of EMBRAPA in Brazil’s Soybean and Forestry-based Pulp ," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series iriba_wp03, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    2. Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria & Marques, Rosane Argou & Silva, Evando Mirra de Paula e, 2013. "University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 443-453.
    3. Carlota Pérez & Anabel Marín & Lizbeth Navas-Alemán, 2014. "The possible dynamic role of natural resource-based networks in Latin American development strategies," Chapters, in: Gabriela Dutrénit & Judith Sutz (ed.), National Innovation Systems, Social Inclusion and Development, chapter 13, pages 380-412, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Rossing, Walter A.H. & Albicette, Maria Marta & Aguerre, Veronica & Leoni, Carolina & Ruggia, Andrea & Dogliotti, Santiago, 2021. "Crafting actionable knowledge on ecological intensification: Lessons from co-innovation approaches in Uruguay and Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Gordon Wilson, 2007. "Knowledge, innovation and re-inventing technical assistance for development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 7(3), pages 183-199, July.
    6. Landel, Pauline, 2015. "Réseaux d’action publique et accès aux connaissances pour la « transition écologique »," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 347(May-June).
    7. David Audretsch & Christian Fisch & Chiara Franzoni & Paul P. Momtaz & Silvio Vismara, 2023. "Academic Freedom and Innovation: A Research Note," Papers 2303.06097, arXiv.org.
    8. Laxmi, Vijay & Mishra, Vinod, 2007. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Resource Conservation Technology: Case of Zero Tillage in Rice-Wheat Farming Systems," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 1-13.
    9. Tamm, Dorel, 2010. "System failures in public sector innovation support measures: The case of Estonian innovation system and dairy industry," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2010-07, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    10. Faure, Guy & Barret, Danielle & Blundo-Canto, Genowefa & Dabat, Marie-Hélène & Devaux-Spatarakis, Agathe & Le Guerroué, Jean Louis & Marquié, Catherine & Mathé, Syndhia & Temple, Ludovic & Toillier, A, 2018. "How different agricultural research models contribute to impacts: Evidence from 13 case studies in developing countries," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 128-136.
    11. Stella Kostopoulou & Paraskevi-Kali Sofianou & Konstantinos Tsiokanos, 2021. "Silk Road Heritage Branding and Polycentric Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Fang Chen & Wenya Sun, 2023. "How Does Carbon Emissions Efficiency Affect OFDI? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Gurib-Fakim, Ameenah & Smith, Linda & Acikgoz, Nazimi & Avato, Patrick & Bossio, Deborah A. & Ebi, Kristie. & Goncalves, Andre & Heinemann, Jack A. & Herrmann, Thora Martina & Padgham, Jonathan & Penn, 2009. "Options to enhance the impact of AKST on development and sustainability goals," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    14. Gabriela Dutrénit & Judith Sutz (ed.), 2014. "National Innovation Systems, Social Inclusion and Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15491.
    15. Allan Dahl Andersen & Olav Wicken, 2016. "Natural resource knowledge idiosyncrasy, innovation, industry dynamics, and sustainability," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20161107, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    16. Ewa Glińska & Wawrzyniec Rudolf, 2019. "City Brand Personality Projected by Municipalities from Central and Eastern Europe Countries—A Comparison of Facebook Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Kilelu, Catherine W. & Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2016. "Unraveling the role of innovation platforms in supporting coevolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy-development program," IFPRI book chapters, in: Devaux, André & Torero, Maximo & Donovan, Jason & Horton, Douglas E. (ed.), Innovation for inclusive value-chain development: Successes and challenges, chapter 9, pages 269-302, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Steven Haggblade & Bart Minten & Carl Pray & Thomas Reardon & David Zilberman, 2017. "The Herbicide Revolution in Developing Countries: Patterns, Causes, and Implications," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(3), pages 533-559, July.
    19. Anabel Marin & Lizbeth Navas-Alemán & Carlota Perez, 2015. "Natural Resource Industries As a Platform for the Development of Knowledge Intensive Industries," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(2), pages 154-168, April.
    20. Rong Sheng & Tuo Lin, 2019. "Evolutionary Assessment of the Ecological Governance under the Metropolitan Background: Evidence from Chongming Eco-Island, Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7951-:d:595448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.