IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7882-d594308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the EU Secondary Biomass Availability and Conversion Processes to Produce Advanced Biofuels: Use of Existing Databases for Assessing a Metric Evaluation for the 2025 Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Di Gruttola

    (Aeronautical, Electrical and Energy Engineering Department (DIAEE), Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Domenico Borello

    (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department (DIMA), Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Nowadays in Europe, the production of advanced biofuels represents a very important objective, given the strong interest in increasing sustainability throughout the transport sector. Production and availability of advanced biofuels are cited as a relevant issue in the most important international actions, such as the Sustainable Development Goals in UN Agenda 2030, EU RED II, and EU Mission Innovation 4, to cite a few of them. However, an important aspect to be considered is the prediction of feedstocks availability to produce advanced biofuel. The first aim of this paper is to assess the availability of European agricultural residues, forestry residues, and biogenic wastes in 2025. The data were collected through a deep review on open FAOSTAT and EUROSTAT databases and then elaborated by the authors. The analysis focuses on the fraction of feedstocks that can be used for advanced biofuels production, i.e., incorporating specific information on sustainable management practices, competitive uses, and environmental risks to preserve soil quality. An autoregressive model is developed to predict future availability, while also considering corrections due to the current pandemic. The results suggest that several European countries could produce enough sustainable advanced feedstocks to meet the European binding target. In particular, France, Germany, and Romania will have high production of agricultural feedstocks; while Austria, Finland, and Sweden will be rich of forestry residues; finally, Italy, France, and United Kingdom will have the highest availability of wastes. To complete the picture, a proper metric is introduced, aiming at generating a technology ranking of the examined alternative fuels, in terms of several relevant parameters such as biomass availability, Technology Readiness Level (TRL), quality of the biofuel, and costs. This analysis allows us to compare advanced biofuels and first-generation biofuels, whose utilization can impact the food market, while also contributing to the increase in the indirect land use change (ILUC). Although the first-generation biofuels remain the most common choice, the renewable (or green) diesel, pyrolysis bio-oil, green jet fuel, and the second-generation bioethanol are promising for different applications in the transport sector. Hydrotreated Vegetable Oils (HVO), Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA), Anaerobic Digestion (AD), and transesterification from vegetable oil represent the most widespread and mature technologies. Thus, it seems mandatory that the transport sector will rely more and more on such fuels in the future. For such reason, a specific support for advanced biomass collection, as well as specific programs for conversion technologies development, are strongly suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Di Gruttola & Domenico Borello, 2021. "Analysis of the EU Secondary Biomass Availability and Conversion Processes to Produce Advanced Biofuels: Use of Existing Databases for Assessing a Metric Evaluation for the 2025 Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7882-:d:594308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Cherng-Yuan & Lu, Cherie, 2021. "Development perspectives of promising lignocellulose feedstocks for production of advanced generation biofuels: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T., 2012. "Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: A review in context to second generation of biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1462-1476.
    3. Doumax-Tagliavini, Virginie & Sarasa, Cristina, 2018. "Looking towards policies supporting biofuels and technological change: Evidence from France," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 430-439.
    4. Sarkar, Nibedita & Ghosh, Sumanta Kumar & Bannerjee, Satarupa & Aikat, Kaustav, 2012. "Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 19-27.
    5. Jarvis, Sean M. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2018. "Technologies and infrastructures underpinning future CO2 value chains: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 46-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lai, Y.Y. & Christley, E. & Kulanovic, A. & Teng, C.C. & Björklund, A. & Nordensvärd, J. & Karakaya, E. & Urban, F., 2022. "Analysing the opportunities and challenges for mitigating the climate impact of aviation: A narrative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Beatrice Vincenti & Francesco Gallucci & Enrico Paris & Monica Carnevale & Adriano Palma & Mariangela Salerno & Carmine Cava & Orlando Palone & Giuliano Agati & Michele Vincenzo Migliarese Caputi & Do, 2023. "Syngas Quality in Fluidized Bed Gasification of Biomass: Comparison between Olivine and K-Feldspar as Bed Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Sam Reis & Peter J. Holliman & Ciaran Martin & Eurig Jones, 2023. "Biomass–Coal Hybrid Fuel: A Route to Net-Zero Iron Ore Sintering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Natália de Almeida Menezes & Isadora Luiza Clímaco Cunha & Moisés Teles dos Santos & Luiz Kulay, 2022. "Obtaining bioLPG via the HVO Route in Brazil: A Prospect Study Based on Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Stefania Lucantonio & Andrea Di Giuliano & Leucio Rossi & Katia Gallucci, 2023. "Green Diesel Production via Deoxygenation Process: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-44, January.
    6. Florin Mihai & Ofelia Ema Aleca & Emilia Gogu & Cosmin Dobrin & Mirela Gheorghe, 2021. "The Challenges of the Green Economy in Romania. Scientific Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Tedesco, S. & Marrero Barroso, T. & Olabi, A.G., 2014. "Optimization of mechanical pre-treatment of Laminariaceae spp. biomass-derived biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 527-534.
    3. Osman, Ahmed I. & Qasim, Umair & Jamil, Farrukh & Al-Muhtaseb, Ala'a H. & Jrai, Ahmad Abu & Al-Riyami, Mohammed & Al-Maawali, Suhaib & Al-Haj, Lamya & Al-Hinai, Amer & Al-Abri, Mohammed & Inayat, Abra, 2021. "Bioethanol and biodiesel: Bibliometric mapping, policies and future needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Ullah, Kifayat & Sharma, Vinod Kumar & Ahmad, Mushtaq & Lv, Pengmei & Krahl, Jurgen & Wang, Zhongming & Sofia,, 2018. "The insight views of advanced technologies and its application in bio-origin fuel synthesis from lignocellulose biomasses waste, a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3992-4008.
    5. Alessandra Cesaro & Vincenzo Belgiorno, 2015. "Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Lu, Qiaomin & Yan, Dong & Wu, Peiwen & Chen, Li & Yagoub, Abu ElGasim A. & Ji, Qinghua & Yu, Xiaojie & Zhou, Cunshan, 2022. "Ultrasound-NATDES/DMSO system for corn straw biomass conversion into platform compounds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 675-683.
    7. Patrice Bougette & Christophe Charlier, 2019. "Subsidies and Countervailing Measures in the EU Biofuel Industry: A Welfare Analysis," Post-Print halshs-02306022, HAL.
    8. Ezeilo, Uchenna R. & Wahab, Roswanira Abdul & Mahat, Naji Arafat, 2020. "Optimization studies on cellulase and xylanase production by Rhizopus oryzae UC2 using raw oil palm frond leaves as substrate under solid state fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1301-1312.
    9. Bayrakci, Asiye Gül & Koçar, Günnur, 2014. "Second-generation bioethanol production from water hyacinth and duckweed in Izmir: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 306-316.
    10. Chiaramonti, David & Goumas, Theodor, 2019. "Impacts on industrial-scale market deployment of advanced biofuels and recycled carbon fuels from the EU Renewable Energy Directive II," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Mohd Yasin, Nazlina Haiza & Maeda, Toshinari & Hu, Anyi & Yu, Chang-Ping & Wood, Thomas K., 2015. "CO2 sequestration by methanogens in activated sludge for methane production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 426-434.
    12. Tan, R.R. & Aviso, K.B. & Ng, D.K.S., 2019. "Optimization models for financing innovations in green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    13. M'Arimi, M.M. & Mecha, C.A. & Kiprop, A.K. & Ramkat, R., 2020. "Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Motevali, Ali & Ghobadian, Barat, 2019. "Ethanol production from date wastes: Adapted technologies, challenges, and global potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1094-1110.
    15. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Assar, Hossein Alizadeh & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Potential of biofuel production from pistachio waste in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    16. Senghor, A. & Dioh, R.M.N. & Müller, C. & Youm, I., 2017. "Cereal crops for biogas production: A review of possible impact of elevated CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 548-554.
    17. Rodriguez, Cristina & Alaswad, A. & Benyounis, K.Y. & Olabi, A.G., 2017. "Pretreatment techniques used in biogas production from grass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1193-1204.
    18. Qu, Chunyun & Dai, Kaiqun & Fu, Hongxin & Wang, Jufang, 2021. "Enhanced ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27/ΔargR1864 with improved lignocellulose-derived inhibitors tolerance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 652-661.
    19. Du, Jing & Qian, Yuting & Xi, Yonglan & Lü, Xiwu, 2019. "Hydrothermal and alkaline thermal pretreatment at mild temperature in solid state for physicochemical properties and biogas production from anaerobic digestion of rice straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 261-267.
    20. Chepeliev, Maksym & Diachuk, Oleksandr & Podolets, Roman & Trypolska, Galyna, 2021. "The role of bioenergy in Ukraine's climate mitigation policy by 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7882-:d:594308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.