IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5495-d1102837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomass–Coal Hybrid Fuel: A Route to Net-Zero Iron Ore Sintering

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Reis

    (Chemistry Engineering Materials Environment Group (CEMEG), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK)

  • Peter J. Holliman

    (Chemistry Engineering Materials Environment Group (CEMEG), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK)

  • Ciaran Martin

    (Tata Steel UK Ltd., Port Talbot, Swansea SA13 2NG, UK)

  • Eurig Jones

    (Chemistry Engineering Materials Environment Group (CEMEG), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK)

Abstract

The global steel industry uses fossil fuels to produce millions of tonnes of iron ore sinter each year. Sintering is an energy-intensive process that fuses iron ore and flux to produce material that balances a high mechanical strength at a sufficient particle size to ensure a macroporous burden in the blast furnace to enable rapid gas flow. As significant CO 2 greenhouse emissions are emitted, the defossilisation of these CO 2 emissions is vital to net-zero carbon targets. Two iterations of a new biomass–coal hybrid fuel (ecoke ® (A) and ecoke ® (B)) were compared with coke breeze and an anthracite coal using oxygen bomb calorimetry, simultaneous thermal analysis (STA) combining thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry, and isoconversional kinetic modelling and pyrolysis–GCMS to study the volatile matter. The calorific values of both ecoke ® (A) and (B) were marginally higher than that of the coke breeze: 27.9 MJ/kg and 27.8 MJ/kg, respectively, compared with 26.5 MJ/kg for the coke breeze. A proximate analysis revealed both ecoke ® samples to have higher volatile matter contents (ca. 12–13%) than the coke breeze (7.4%), but less than the anthracite coal (ca. 14%). The thermogravimetric analysis of the burnout kinetics of the fuels heated up to 1000 °C, at heating rates from 5 to 25 °C/min, showed that that the coke breeze and anthracite coal had higher ignition and burnout temperatures than the ecoke ® samples. Kinetic analysis using the Freidman and Ozawa methods found that the ecoke ® samples showed comparable maximum mass loss rates to the coke breeze but lower activation energies. From these results, both ecoke ® samples have the potential to replace some of the coke breeze in the sintering process or EAF processes to help achieve net zero by offsetting up to 30% of the CO 2 emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Reis & Peter J. Holliman & Ciaran Martin & Eurig Jones, 2023. "Biomass–Coal Hybrid Fuel: A Route to Net-Zero Iron Ore Sintering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5495-:d:1102837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    2. Lu, Jau-Jang & Chen, Wei-Hsin, 2015. "Investigation on the ignition and burnout temperatures of bamboo and sugarcane bagasse by thermogravimetric analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 49-57.
    3. Francesca Di Gruttola & Domenico Borello, 2021. "Analysis of the EU Secondary Biomass Availability and Conversion Processes to Produce Advanced Biofuels: Use of Existing Databases for Assessing a Metric Evaluation for the 2025 Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Ni, Liangmeng & Feng, Zixing & Zhang, Tao & Gao, Qi & Hou, Yanmei & He, Yuyu & Su, Mengfu & Ren, Hao & Hu, Wanhe & Liu, Zhijia, 2022. "Effect of pyrolysis heating rates on fuel properties of molded charcoal: Imitating industrial pyrolysis process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 257-267.
    5. Cai, Junmeng & Xu, Di & Dong, Zhujun & Yu, Xi & Yang, Yang & Banks, Scott W. & Bridgwater, Anthony V., 2018. "Processing thermogravimetric analysis data for isoconversional kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: Case study of corn stalk," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2705-2715.
    6. Cheng, Zhilong & Yang, Jian & Zhou, Lang & Liu, Yan & Wang, Qiuwang, 2016. "Characteristics of charcoal combustion and its effects on iron-ore sintering performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 364-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Zhilong & Tan, Zhoutuo & Guo, Zhigang & Yang, Jian & Wang, Qiuwang, 2020. "Recent progress in sustainable and energy-efficient technologies for sinter production in the iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Wang, Guangwei & Zhang, Jianliang & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Mao, Xiaoming & Ye, Lian & Xu, Wanren & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Wang, Chuan, 2020. "Hydrothermal carbonization of maize straw for hydrochar production and its injection for blast furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Escalante, Jamin & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Hoang, Anh Tuan & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Andrew Lin, Kun-Yi & Saravanakumar, Ayyadurai, 2022. "Pyrolysis of lignocellulosic, algal, plastic, and other biomass wastes for biofuel production and circular bioeconomy: A review of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    5. Yang, Yantao & Qu, Xia & Huang, Guorun & Ren, Suxia & Dong, Lili & Sun, Tanglei & Liu, Peng & Li, Yanling & Lei, Tingzhou & Cai, Junmeng, 2023. "Insight into lignocellulosic biomass torrefaction kinetics with case study of pinewood sawdust torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Śliz, Maciej & Wilk, Małgorzata, 2020. "A comprehensive investigation of hydrothermal carbonization: Energy potential of hydrochar derived from Virginia mallow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 942-950.
    7. Song, Weiming & Zhou, Jianan & Li, Yujie & Yang, Jian & Cheng, Rijin, 2021. "New technology for producing high-quality combustible gas by high-temperature reaction of dust-removal coke powder in mixed atmosphere," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Hillig, Débora Moraes & Pohlmann, Juliana Gonçalves & Manera, Christian & Perondi, Daniele & Pereira, Fernando Marcelo & Altafini, Carlos Roberto & Godinho, Marcelo, 2020. "Evaluation of the structural changes of a char produced by slow pyrolysis of biomass and of a high-ash coal during its combustion and their role in the reactivity and flue gas emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Leandro C. de Morais & Amanda A. Maia & Pedro R. Resende & André H. Rosa & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2022. "Thermochemical Conversion of Sugarcane Bagasse: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ignition and Burnout Temperatures," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Mishra, Garima & Bhaskar, Thallada, 2022. "Insights into the decomposition kinetics of groundnut shell: An advanced isoconversional approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Yu-Chiao Lu & Liviu Brabie & Andrey V. Karasev & Chuan Wang, 2022. "Applications of Hydrochar and Charcoal in the Iron and Steelmaking Industry—Part 2: Carburization of Liquid Iron by Addition of Iron–Carbon Briquettes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Kuan, Yong-Hao & Wu, Fang-Hsien & Chen, Guan-Bang & Lin, Hsien-Tsung & Lin, Ta-Hui, 2020. "Study of the combustion characteristics of sewage sludge pyrolysis oil, heavy fuel oil, and their blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Andrew N. Amenaghawon & Chinedu L. Anyalewechi & Charity O. Okieimen & Heri Septya Kusuma, 2021. "Biomass pyrolysis technologies for value-added products: a state-of-the-art review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14324-14378, October.
    14. Luo, Laipeng & Zhang, Zhiyi & Li, Chong & Nishu, & He, Fang & Zhang, Xingguang & Cai, Junmeng, 2021. "Insight into master plots method for kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    15. Małgorzata Sieradzka & Agata Mlonka-Mędrala & Izabela Kalemba-Rec & Markus Reinmöller & Felix Küster & Wojciech Kalawa & Aneta Magdziarz, 2022. "Evaluation of Physical and Chemical Properties of Residue from Gasification of Biomass Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Chen, Qianqian & Gu, Yu & Tang, Zhiyong & Wei, Wei & Sun, Yuhan, 2018. "Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 192-207.
    17. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Abel M. Rodrigues & João C. O. Matias & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues, 2021. "Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Xu, Li & Li, Shengcai & Sun, Wanghu & Ma, Xin & Cao, Shuchao, 2020. "Combustion behaviors and characteristic parameters determination of sassafras wood under different heating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Feng, Yipeng & Qiu, Keying & Zhang, Zhiping & Li, Chong & Rahman, Md. Maksudur & Cai, Junmeng, 2022. "Distributed activation energy model for lignocellulosic biomass torrefaction kinetics with combined heating program," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    20. Mau, Vivian & Gross, Amit, 2018. "Energy conversion and gas emissions from production and combustion of poultry-litter-derived hydrochar and biochar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 510-519.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5495-:d:1102837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.