IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2600-d1053911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Syngas Quality in Fluidized Bed Gasification of Biomass: Comparison between Olivine and K-Feldspar as Bed Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Beatrice Vincenti

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 00015 Rome, Italy
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, La Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesco Gallucci

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 00015 Rome, Italy)

  • Enrico Paris

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 00015 Rome, Italy
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, La Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Monica Carnevale

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 00015 Rome, Italy)

  • Adriano Palma

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 00015 Rome, Italy)

  • Mariangela Salerno

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 00015 Rome, Italy)

  • Carmine Cava

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, La Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Orlando Palone

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, La Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Giuliano Agati

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, La Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Michele Vincenzo Migliarese Caputi

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, La Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Domenico Borello

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, La Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The relevance of selecting an appropriate bed material in fluidized bed gasification is a crucial aspect that is often underestimated. The ideal material should be economical, resistant to high temperatures and have small chemical interaction with biomass. However, often only the first of such three aspects is considered, neglecting the biomass–bed interaction effects that develop at high temperatures. In this work, olivine and K-feldspar were upscale-tested in a prototype fluidized bed gasifier (FBG) using arboreal biomass (almond shells). The produced syngas in the two different tests was characterized and compared in terms of composition (H 2 , CH 4 , CO, CO 2 , O 2 ) and fate of contaminants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), tar and metals.. Moreover, the composition of olivine and K-feldspar before and after the biomass gasification process has been characterized. The aim of this work is to show which advantages and disadvantages there are in choosing the most suitable material and to optimize the biomass gasification process by reducing the undesirable effects, such as heavy metal production, bed agglomeration and tar production, which are harmful when syngas is used in internal combustion engines (ICE). It has been observed that metals, such as Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Sn, Ba and Pb, have higher concentrations in the syngas produced by using olivine as bed material rather than K-feldspar. In particular, heavy metals, such as Pb, Cu, Cd, Ni and Zn, show concentrations of 61.06 mg/Nm 3 , 15.29 mg/Nm 3 , 17.97 mg/Nm 3 , 37.29 mg/Nm 3 and 116.39 mg/Nm 3 , respectively, compared to 23.26 mg/Nm 3 , 11.82 mg/Nm 3 , 2.76 mg/Nm 3 , 24.46 mg/Nm 3 and 53.07 mg/Nm 3 detected with K-feldspar. Moreover, a more hydrogen-rich syngas when using K-feldspar was produced (46% compared to 39% with olivine).

Suggested Citation

  • Beatrice Vincenti & Francesco Gallucci & Enrico Paris & Monica Carnevale & Adriano Palma & Mariangela Salerno & Carmine Cava & Orlando Palone & Giuliano Agati & Michele Vincenzo Migliarese Caputi & Do, 2023. "Syngas Quality in Fluidized Bed Gasification of Biomass: Comparison between Olivine and K-Feldspar as Bed Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2600-:d:1053911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauerhofer, A.M. & Benedikt, F. & Schmid, J.C. & Fuchs, J. & Müller, S. & Hofbauer, H., 2018. "Influence of different bed material mixtures on dual fluidized bed steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 957-968.
    2. Carlos Vargas-Salgado & Elías Hurtado-Pérez & David Alfonso-Solar & Anders Malmquist, 2021. "Empirical Design, Construction, and Experimental Test of a Small-Scale Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Abdelhady, Suzan & Borello, Domenico & Shaban, Ahmed, 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass power plant fed with rice straw: Sensitivity and parametric analysis of the performance and the LCOE," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1026-1034.
    4. Wagner, Katharina & Häggström, Gustav & Skoglund, Nils & Priscak, Juraj & Kuba, Matthias & Öhman, Marcus & Hofbauer, Hermann, 2019. "Layer formation mechanism of K-feldspar in bubbling fluidized bed combustion of phosphorus-lean and phosphorus-rich residual biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 545-554.
    5. Francesca Di Gruttola & Domenico Borello, 2021. "Analysis of the EU Secondary Biomass Availability and Conversion Processes to Produce Advanced Biofuels: Use of Existing Databases for Assessing a Metric Evaluation for the 2025 Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anand, Amrit & Kachhap, Anju & Gautam, Shalini, 2023. "Synergistic effect of coal and biomass gasification and organo-inorganic elemental impact on gasification performance and product gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Mojtahed, Ali & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Sgaramella, Antonio & de Santoli, Livio, 2025. "Application of machine learning to model waste energy recovery for green hydrogen production: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fürsatz, K. & Fuchs, J. & Benedikt, F. & Kuba, M. & Hofbauer, H., 2021. "Effect of biomass fuel ash and bed material on the product gas composition in DFB steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Ding, Xianghai & Liu, Chunlai & Li, Cunbin, 2019. "Biomass power generation fuel procurement and storage modes evaluation: A case study in Jilin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 75-86.
    3. Chaudhary, Anu & Rathour, Ranju Kumari & Solanki, Preeti & Mehta Kakkar, Preeti & Pathania, Shruti & Walia, Abhishek & Baadhe, Rama Raju & Bhatia, Ravi Kant, 2025. "Recent technological advancements in biomass conversion to biofuels and bioenergy for circular economy roadmap," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    4. Stefania Lucantonio & Andrea Di Giuliano & Leucio Rossi & Katia Gallucci, 2023. "Green Diesel Production via Deoxygenation Process: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-44, January.
    5. He, Jiaxin & Liu, Ying & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Should China support the development of biomass power generation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 416-425.
    6. Nandimandalam, Hariteja & Gude, Veera Gnaneswar, 2022. "Renewable wood residue sources as potential alternative for fossil fuel dominated electricity mix for regions in Mississippi: A techno-economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1105-1119.
    7. Gojiya, Anil & Deb, Dipankar & Iyer, Kannan K.R., 2019. "Feasibility study of power generation from agricultural residue in comparison with soil incorporation of residue," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 416-425.
    8. Li, Dongfang & Qu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Junjie & Hong, Suck Won & Jeon, Chung-hwan, 2022. "Microstructural development of product layer during limestone sulfation and its relationship to agglomeration in large-scale CFB boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    9. Sher, Farooq & Smječanin, Narcisa & Khan, Muhammad Kashif & Shabbir, Imran & Ali, Salman & Hatshan, Mohammad Rafe & Ul Hai, Irfan, 2024. "Agglomeration behaviour of various biomass fuels under different air staging conditions in fluidised bed technology for renewable energy applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Gürel, Barış & Kurtuluş, Karani & Yurdakul, Sema & Varol, Murat & Keçebaş, Ali & Gürbüz, Habib, 2023. "Numerical and experimental investigation of co-combustion of chicken manure and lignite blends in a CFBB with novel compact combustion chamber," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    11. S. M. Shafie & Z. Othman & N. Hami, 2020. "Optimum Location of Biomass Waste Residue Power Plant in Northern Region: Economic and Environmental Assessment," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 150-154.
    12. Pillot, Benjamin & de Siqueira, Sandro & Dias, João Batista, 2018. "Grid parity analysis of distributed PV generation using Monte Carlo approach: The Brazilian case," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 974-988.
    13. Ribó-Pérez, David & Herraiz-Cañete, Ángela & Alfonso-Solar, David & Vargas-Salgado, Carlos & Gómez-Navarro, Tomás, 2021. "Modelling biomass gasifiers in hybrid renewable energy microgrids; a complete procedure for enabling gasifiers simulation in HOMER," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 501-512.
    14. Walmsley, Timothy Gordon & Philipp, Matthias & Picón-Núñez, Martín & Meschede, Henning & Taylor, Matthew Thomas & Schlosser, Florian & Atkins, Martin John, 2023. "Hybrid renewable energy utility systems for industrial sites: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Xiang, Yanlei & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Cheng, Zeyang & Liu, Zexi, 2020. "Study on the effect of gasification agents on the integrated system of biomass gasification combined cycle and oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Sivabalan Kaniapan & Jagadeesh Pasupuleti & Kartikeyan Patma Nesan & Haris Nalakath Abubackar & Hadiza Aminu Umar & Temidayo Lekan Oladosu & Segun R. Bello & Eldon R. Rene, 2022. "A Review of the Sustainable Utilization of Rice Residues for Bioenergy Conversion Using Different Valorization Techniques, Their Challenges, and Techno-Economic Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    17. Vargas-Salgado, Carlos & Águila-León, Jesús & Alfonso-Solar, David & Malmquist, Anders, 2022. "Simulations and experimental study to compare the behavior of a genset running on gasoline or syngas for small scale power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    18. Bayón-Cueli, C. & Barbón, A. & Bayón, L. & Barbón, N., 2020. "A cost-energy based methodology for small-scale linear Fresnel reflectors on flat roofs of urban buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 944-959.
    19. Zhang, Fengxia & Yang, Shiliang & Yang, Bin & Wang, Hua, 2022. "Mesoscale bubble dynamics in the gasifier of a 1MWth dual fluidized bed gasifier for biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    20. Natália de Almeida Menezes & Isadora Luiza Clímaco Cunha & Moisés Teles dos Santos & Luiz Kulay, 2022. "Obtaining bioLPG via the HVO Route in Brazil: A Prospect Study Based on Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2600-:d:1053911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.