IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p6986-d579302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delayed and Approved: A Quantitative Study of Conflicts and the Environmental Impact Assessments of Energy Projects in Chile 2012–2017

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastián Huneeus

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Political Science Institute, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Sergio Toro

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Public Administration and Political Science Department, University of Concepción, Concepción 4070396, Chile)

  • Juan Pablo Luna

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Political Science Institute, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Santiago 8331150, Chile
    School of Government, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Diego Sazo

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK)

  • Andrés Cruz

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Daniel Alcatruz

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Bryan Castillo

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Camila Bertranou

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

  • Javier Cisterna

    (Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

Abstract

The Sistema de Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Assessment System—SEIA) evaluates all projects potentially harmful to human health and the environment in Chile. Since its establishment, many projects approved by the SEIA have been contested by organized communities, especially in the energy sector. The question guiding our research is whether socio-environmental conflicts affect the evaluation times and the approval rates of projects under assessment. Using a novel database comprising all energy projects assessed by the SEIA, we analyzed 380 energy projects that entered the SEIA review process between 2012 and 2017 and matched these projects with protest events. Using linear and logit regression, we find no association between the occurrence of protests aimed at specific projects and the probability of project approval. We do, however, find that projects associated with the occurrence of protest events experience significantly longer review times. To assess the robustness of this finding, we compare two run-of-river plants proposed in Mapuche territory in Chile’s La Araucanía region. We discuss the broader implications of these findings for sustainable environmental decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastián Huneeus & Sergio Toro & Juan Pablo Luna & Diego Sazo & Andrés Cruz & Daniel Alcatruz & Bryan Castillo & Camila Bertranou & Javier Cisterna, 2021. "Delayed and Approved: A Quantitative Study of Conflicts and the Environmental Impact Assessments of Energy Projects in Chile 2012–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:6986-:d:579302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/6986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/6986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lapegna, Pablo, 2016. "Soybeans and Power: Genetically Modified Crops, Environmental Politics, and Social Movements in Argentina," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190215149.
    2. Kathryn Hochstetler, 2018. "Environmental impact assessment: evidence-based policymaking in Brazil," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 100-111, January.
    3. Jinjin Guan & Harald Zepp, 2020. "Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore Wind Farms: A Case Study of the Zhongying Wind Farm in Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Jaskoski, Maiah, 2014. "Environmental Licensing and Conflict in Peru's Mining Sector: A Path-Dependent Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 873-883.
    5. Katia Valenzuela-Fuentes & Esteban Alarcón-Barrueto & Robinson Torres-Salinas, 2021. "From Resistance to Creation: Socio-Environmental Activism in Chile’s “Sacrifice Zones”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Paul Alexander Haslam, 2020. "Bigger Data and Quantitative Methods in the Study of Socio-Environmental Conflicts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    7. David Carruthers & Patricia Rodriguez, 2009. "Mapuche Protest, Environmental Conflict and Social Movement Linkage in Chile," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 743-760.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristian Escobar-Avaria & Rodrigo Fuster & Katherinne Silva-Urrutia & Carl Bauer & Andrés de la Fuente, 2022. "Understanding Conditioning Factors for Hydroelectric Development in Chile: Bases for Community Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanxin Liu & FengYun Li & Yi Wang & Xinhua Yu & Jiahai Yuan & Yuwei Wang, 2018. "Assessing the Environmental Impact Caused by Power Grid Projects in High Altitude Areas Based on BWM and Vague Sets Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Kotsadam, Andreas & Tolonen, Anja, 2016. "African Mining, Gender, and Local Employment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 325-339.
    3. Haslam, Paul Alexander, 2021. "The micro-politics of corporate responsibility: How companies shape protest in communities affected by mining," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Orihuela, José Carlos & Mendieta, Arturo & Pérez, Carlos & Ramírez, Tania, 2021. "From paper institutions to bureaucratic autonomy: Institutional change as a resource curse remedy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Pierre Delvenne, 2021. "Cultivating power, enacting consent. A critical review of ‘Seeds of power. Environmental injustice and genetically modified soybeans in Argentina’, (A. Leguizamón) 2020, Duke University Press, 221 p," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 441-447, December.
    6. Ravikumar, Ashwin & Chairez Uriarte, Esperanza & Lizano, Daniela & Muñoz Ledo Farré, Andrea & Montero, Mariel, 2023. "How payments for ecosystem services can undermine Indigenous institutions: The case of Peru's Ampiyacu-Apayacu watershed," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Maria Eugenia Giraudo & Jean Grugel, 2022. "Imaginaries of Soy and the Costs of Commodity‐led Development: Reflections from Argentina," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(4), pages 796-826, July.
    8. Jaimovich, Dany & Toledo, Felipe, 2021. "The grievances of a failed reform: Chilean land reform and conflict with indigenous communities," MPRA Paper 109136, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Amengual, Matthew, 2018. "Buying stability: The distributive outcomes of private politics in the Bolivian mining industry," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 31-45.
    10. Merino, Roger, 2018. "Re-politicizing participation or reframing environmental governance? Beyond indigenous’ prior consultation and citizen participation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 75-83.
    11. George Holmes, 2015. "Markets, Nature, Neoliberalism, and Conservation through Private Protected Areas in Southern Chile," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(4), pages 850-866, April.
    12. Andrew Osei Agyemang & Kong Yusheng & Angelina Kissiwaa Twum & Emmanuel Caesar Ayamba & Maxwell Kongkuah & Mohammed Musah, 2021. "Trend and relationship between environmental accounting disclosure and environmental performance for mining companies listed in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12192-12216, August.
    13. Haslam, Paul Alexander & Ary Tanimoune, Nasser, 2016. "The Determinants of Social Conflict in the Latin American Mining Sector: New Evidence with Quantitative Data," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 401-419.
    14. Marula Tsagkari & Jordi Roca & Phedeas Stephanides, 2022. "Sustainability of local renewable energy projects: A comprehensive framework and an empirical analysis on two islands," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1155-1168, October.
    15. Andrew L. Ofstehage, 2018. "Financialization of work, value, and social organization among transnational soy farmers in the Brazilian Cerrado," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 274-285, June.
    16. Ela Romov & Na’ama Teschner, 2022. "A Place under the Sun: Planning, Landscape and Participation in a Case of a Solar Powerplant in the Israeli Desert," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    17. repec:gig:joupla:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:125-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Aniket Aga, 2021. "Environment and its Forms of Knowledge: The Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops in India," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 37(2), pages 167-183, June.
    19. Hinojosa, Leonith & Bebbington, Anthony & Cortez, Guido & Chumacero, Juan Pablo & Humphreys Bebbington, Denise & Hennermann, Karl, 2015. "Gas and Development: Rural Territorial Dynamics in Tarija, Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 105-117.
    20. Harleman, Max & Weber, Jeremy G., 2017. "Natural resource ownership, financial gains, and governance: The case of unconventional gas development in the UK and the US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 281-296.
    21. Schoderer, Mirja & Ott, Marlen, 2022. "Contested water- and miningscapes – Explaining the high intensity of water and mining conflicts in a meta-study," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:6986-:d:579302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.