IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6668-d573372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Analysis of Methods Adopted for Evaluation of Mixing Efficiency in an Anaerobic Digester

Author

Listed:
  • Buta Singh

    (Institute of Energy Engineering and Chemical Machinery, University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary)

  • Narinder Singh

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, 84123 Salerno, Italy)

  • Zsolt Čonka

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 04001 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Michal Kolcun

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 04001 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Zoltán Siménfalvi

    (Institute of Energy Engineering and Chemical Machinery, University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary)

  • Zsolt Péter

    (Institute of World and Regional Economics, University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary)

  • Zoltán Szamosi

    (Institute of Energy Engineering and Chemical Machinery, University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary)

Abstract

The effect of slurry mixing in an anaerobic digester on biogas production was intensively studied in the last few years. This subject is still debatable due to fact that this process involves three phases, solid-gas-liquid, along with the involvement of microbes during biochemical reactions, which are highly vulnerable to changes in hydrodynamic shear stresses and mixing conditions. Moreover, the complexity in the direction of optimization of mixing magnifies due to the implication of both fluid mechanics and biochemical engineering to study the effect of mixing in anaerobic digestion (AD). The effect of mixing on AD is explored using recent literature and theoretical analysis, concentrating on the multi-phase and multi-scale aspects of AD. The tools and methods available to experimentally quantify the function of mixing on both the global and local scales are summarized in this study. The major challenge for mixing in an anaerobic digester is to minimize dead zones and maintain uniform distribution of viscosity and shear at low mixing intensities without disrupting the microbial flocs and syntrophic relationships between the bacteria during the AD process. This study is a critical analysis of various techniques and approaches adopted by researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of mixing regimes and mixing equipment. Most studies describe biogas production performance and hydrodynamic characteristics of the digesters separately, but the evaluation of mixing requires interdisciplinary experts, which include mechanical engineers, microbiologists and hydrodynamic experts. Through this review, the readers will be guided through intensive literature regarding agitation, the best possible way to scrutinize the agitation problems and the approach to answering the question “why is the optimization of mixing in an anaerobic digester still a debatable subject?”.

Suggested Citation

  • Buta Singh & Narinder Singh & Zsolt Čonka & Michal Kolcun & Zoltán Siménfalvi & Zsolt Péter & Zoltán Szamosi, 2021. "Critical Analysis of Methods Adopted for Evaluation of Mixing Efficiency in an Anaerobic Digester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6668-:d:573372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6668/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6668/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papurello, Davide & Boschetti, Andrea & Silvestri, Silvia & Khomenko, Iuliia & Biasioli, Franco, 2018. "Real-time monitoring of removal of trace compounds with PTR-MS: Biochar experimental investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 344-355.
    2. Kowalczyk, Alexandra & Harnisch, Eva & Schwede, Sebastian & Gerber, Mandy & Span, Roland, 2013. "Different mixing modes for biogas plants using energy crops," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 465-472.
    3. Lindmark, Johan & Thorin, Eva & Bel Fdhila, Rebei & Dahlquist, Erik, 2014. "Effects of mixing on the result of anaerobic digestion: Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1030-1047.
    4. Conti, Fosca & Wiedemann, Leonhard & Sonnleitner, Matthias & Saidi, Abdessamad & Goldbrunner, Markus, 2019. "Monitoring the mixing of an artificial model substrate in a scale-down laboratory digester," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 351-362.
    5. Mohammadrezaei, Rashed & Zareei, Samira & Behroozi- Khazaei, Nasser, 2018. "Optimum mixing rate in biogas reactors: Energy balance calculations and computational fluid dynamics simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 54-60.
    6. Lantz, Mikael, 2012. "The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – A comparison of different CHP technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 502-511.
    7. Leonzio, Grazia, 2018. "Study of mixing systems and geometric configurations for anaerobic digesters using CFD analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 578-589.
    8. Singh, Buta & Szamosi, Zoltán & Siménfalvi, Zoltán, 2019. "State of the art on mixing in an anaerobic digester: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 922-936.
    9. Hans-Joachim Naegele & Andreas Lemmer & Hans Oechsner & Thomas Jungbluth, 2012. "Electric Energy Consumption of the Full Scale Research Biogas Plant “Unterer Lindenhof”: Results of Longterm and Full Detail Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Buta & Szamosi, Zoltán & Siménfalvi, Zoltán, 2019. "State of the art on mixing in an anaerobic digester: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 922-936.
    2. Schneider, Nico & Gerber, Mandy, 2020. "Rheological properties of digestate from agricultural biogas plants: An overview of measurement techniques and influencing factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    3. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2021. "Energy performance of an unmixed anaerobic digester with submerged solid waste: Effects of temperature distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Effects of the temperature range on the energy performance of mixed and unmixed digesters with submerged waste: An experimental and CFD simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1092-1104.
    5. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.
    6. Zamani Abyaneh, Ehsan & Zarghami, Reza & Krühne, Ulrich & Rosinha Grundtvig, Inês P. & Ramin, Pedram & Mostoufi, Navid, 2022. "Mixing assessment of an industrial anaerobic digestion reactor using CFD," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 537-549.
    7. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    8. Sean O’Connor & Ehiaze Ehimen & Suresh C. Pillai & Gary Lyons & John Bartlett, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Analysis of Small-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plants on Irish Dairy Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Zhang, Jingxin & Mao, Liwei & Nithya, Karthikeyan & Loh, Kai-Chee & Dai, Yanjun & He, Yiliang & Wah Tong, Yen, 2019. "Optimizing mixing strategy to improve the performance of an anaerobic digestion waste-to-energy system for energy recovery from food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 28-36.
    10. Leonzio, Grazia, 2019. "Fluid dynamic study of anaerobic digester: optimization of mixing and geometric configuration by using response surface methodology and factorial design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 769-780.
    11. Conti, Fosca & Wiedemann, Leonhard & Sonnleitner, Matthias & Saidi, Abdessamad & Goldbrunner, Markus, 2019. "Monitoring the mixing of an artificial model substrate in a scale-down laboratory digester," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 351-362.
    12. Vojtěch Zejda & Vítězslav Máša & Šárka Václavková & Pavel Skryja, 2020. "A Novel Check-List Strategy to Evaluate the Potential of Operational Improvements in Wastewater Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Guan, Tingting & Alvfors, Per & Lindbergh, Göran, 2014. "Investigation of the prospect of energy self-sufficiency and technical performance of an integrated PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell), dairy farm and biogas plant system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 685-691.
    14. Patrizio, P. & Leduc, S. & Chinese, D. & Kraxner, F., 2017. "Internalizing the external costs of biogas supply chains in the Italian energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 85-96.
    15. Zhao, Shuchun & Guo, Junheng & Dang, Xiuhu & Ai, Bingyan & Zhang, Minqing & Li, Wei & Zhang, Jinli, 2022. "Energy consumption, flow characteristics and energy-efficient design of cup-shape blade stirred tank reactors: Computational fluid dynamics and artificial neural network investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    16. Sohoo, Ihsanullah & Ritzkowski, Marco & Heerenklage, Jörn & Kuchta, Kerstin, 2021. "Biochemical methane potential assessment of municipal solid waste generated in Asian cities: A case study of Karachi, Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Wang, Jun & Xue, Qingwen & Guo, Ting & Mei, Zili & Long, Enshen & Wen, Qian & Huang, Wei & Luo, Tao & Huang, Ruyi, 2018. "A review on CFD simulating method for biogas fermentation material fluid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 64-73.
    18. Lauer, Markus & Hansen, Jason K. & Lamers, Patrick & Thrän, Daniela, 2018. "Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 621-636.
    19. Duarte, M. Salomé & Sinisgalli, Erika & Cavaleiro, Ana J. & Bertin, Lorenzo & Alves, M. Madalena & Pereira, M. Alcina, 2021. "Intensification of methane production from waste frying oil in a biogas-lift bioreactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1141-1148.
    20. Mulka, Rafał & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Szlachta, Józef & Mulka, Mariusz, 2016. "Estimation of methane production for batch technology – A new approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 440-449.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6668-:d:573372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.