IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5005-d418013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Check-List Strategy to Evaluate the Potential of Operational Improvements in Wastewater Treatment Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Vojtěch Zejda

    (Institute of Process Engineering & NETME Centre, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Vítězslav Máša

    (Institute of Process Engineering & NETME Centre, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Šárka Václavková

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the CAS, V.v.i., Rozvojova 135, 165 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Skryja

    (Institute of Process Engineering & NETME Centre, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

With increasing demands for cleaning and purification of water, wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) require their most efficient operation. The operators are thus obliged to constantly review the efficiency of the processing units and technological equipment of WWTPs and seek opportunities for improvements. To increase the efficiency of particular equipment, the important parameters to be used for the intensification must be correctly selected. A common WWTP consists of different types of processing units, where the basic parameters can be changed to achieve the highest efficiency (i.e., maximum output with minimum energy consumption) in the WWTP. However, due to many possible technologies in the wastewater treatment process, the combinations of processing units can be complex. In such cases, the efficiency assessment can be misleading if only basic parameters were accessed. Moreover, single-unit intensification can potentially improve the efficiency of the unit itself but cannot guarantee full process improvement. This can be due to negative causal effects in the downstream due to that unit intensification. This work reviews of key parameters at five selected pieces of WWTP equipment (inlet pump station, airlift pump, primary sedimentation tank, aeration chamber, and mixing of anaerobic digester) to demonstrate the correct selection of all affected parameters for the efficiency assessment. In the context of the whole WWTP process, it is necessary to take into account several other parameters to evaluate the efficiency of the equipment. Finally, a methodology for assessing the significance of the identified parameters is proposed. This methodology is effectively applied and demonstrated in the WWTP case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Vojtěch Zejda & Vítězslav Máša & Šárka Václavková & Pavel Skryja, 2020. "A Novel Check-List Strategy to Evaluate the Potential of Operational Improvements in Wastewater Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5005-:d:418013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5005/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5005/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Descoins, N. & Deleris, S. & Lestienne, R. & Trouvé, E. & Maréchal, F., 2012. "Energy efficiency in waste water treatments plants: Optimization of activated sludge process coupled with anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 153-164.
    2. Zhang, Zijun & Zeng, Yaohui & Kusiak, Andrew, 2012. "Minimizing pump energy in a wastewater processing plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 505-514.
    3. Kowalczyk, Alexandra & Harnisch, Eva & Schwede, Sebastian & Gerber, Mandy & Span, Roland, 2013. "Different mixing modes for biogas plants using energy crops," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 465-472.
    4. Singh, Buta & Szamosi, Zoltán & Siménfalvi, Zoltán, 2019. "State of the art on mixing in an anaerobic digester: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 922-936.
    5. Yu, Liang & Ma, Jingwei & Frear, Craig & Zhao, Quanbao & Dillon, Robert & Li, Xiujin & Chen, Shulin, 2013. "Multiphase modeling of settling and suspension in anaerobic digester," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 28-39.
    6. Macintosh, C. & Astals, S. & Sembera, C. & Ertl, A. & Drewes, J.E. & Jensen, P.D. & Koch, K., 2019. "Successful strategies for increasing energy self-sufficiency at Grüneck wastewater treatment plant in Germany by food waste co-digestion and improved aeration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 797-808.
    7. Gude, Veera Gnaneswar, 2015. "Energy and water autarky of wastewater treatment and power generation systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 52-68.
    8. Panepinto, Deborah & Fiore, Silvia & Zappone, Mariantonia & Genon, Giuseppe & Meucci, Lorenza, 2016. "Evaluation of the energy efficiency of a large wastewater treatment plant in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 404-411.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmadi, Ehsan & Yousefzadeh, Samira & Mokammel, Adel & Miri, Mohammad & Ansari, Mohsen & Arfaeinia, Hossein & Badi, Mojtaba Yegane & Ghaffari, Hamid Reza & Rezaei, Soheila & Mahvi, Amir Hossein, 2020. "Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á. & Bertsch, Valentin & Casey, Eoin, 2020. "Modelling demand response with process models and energy systems models: Potential applications for wastewater treatment within the energy-water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Ahmad, Shakeel & Jia, Haifeng & Chen, Zhengxia & Li, Qian & Xu, Changqing, 2020. "Water-energy nexus and energy efficiency: A systematic analysis of urban water systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Macintosh, C. & Astals, S. & Sembera, C. & Ertl, A. & Drewes, J.E. & Jensen, P.D. & Koch, K., 2019. "Successful strategies for increasing energy self-sufficiency at Grüneck wastewater treatment plant in Germany by food waste co-digestion and improved aeration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 797-808.
    5. Guven, Huseyin & Ersahin, Mustafa Evren & Dereli, Recep Kaan & Ozgun, Hale & Isik, Isa & Ozturk, Izzet, 2019. "Energy recovery potential of anaerobic digestion of excess sludge from high-rate activated sludge systems co-treating municipal wastewater and food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1027-1036.
    6. Strazzabosco, A. & Kenway, S.J. & Conrad, S.A. & Lant, P.A., 2021. "Renewable electricity generation in the Australian water industry: Lessons learned and challenges for the future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Luo, Li & Dzakpasu, Mawuli & Yang, Baichuan & Zhang, Wushou & Yang, Yahong & Wang, Xiaochang C., 2019. "A novel index of total oxygen demand for the comprehensive evaluation of energy consumption for urban wastewater treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 253-261.
    8. Odabaş Baş, Gözde & Aydınalp Köksal, Merih, 2022. "Environmental and techno-economic analysis of the integration of biogas and solar power systems into urban wastewater treatment plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 579-597.
    9. Krieg, Thomas & Enzmann, Franziska & Sell, Dieter & Schrader, Jens & Holtmann, Dirk, 2017. "Simulation of the current generation of a microbial fuel cell in a laboratory wastewater treatment plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 942-949.
    10. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.
    11. Yan, Peng & Shi, Hong-Xin & Chen, You-Peng & Gao, Xu & Fang, Fang & Guo, Jin-Song, 2020. "Optimization of recovery and utilization pathway of chemical energy from wastewater pollutants by a net-zero energy wastewater treatment model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á & Casey, Eoin & Bertsch, Valentin, 2019. "Demand response within the energy-for-water-nexus: A review," Papers WP637, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    13. Buta Singh & Narinder Singh & Zsolt Čonka & Michal Kolcun & Zoltán Siménfalvi & Zsolt Péter & Zoltán Szamosi, 2021. "Critical Analysis of Methods Adopted for Evaluation of Mixing Efficiency in an Anaerobic Digester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Mattia Cottes & Matia Mainardis & Daniele Goi & Patrizia Simeoni, 2020. "Demand-Response Application in Wastewater Treatment Plants Using Compressed Air Storage System: A Modelling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    16. Moazeni, Faegheh & Khazaei, Javad, 2021. "Co-optimization of wastewater treatment plants interconnected with smart grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    17. Schneider, Nico & Gerber, Mandy, 2020. "Rheological properties of digestate from agricultural biogas plants: An overview of measurement techniques and influencing factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Molinos-Senante, Maria & Maziotis, Alexandros, 2022. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of wastewater treatment plants: The influence of the technology and aging factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    19. Zaborowska, Ewa & Czerwionka, Krzysztof & Mąkinia, Jacek, 2021. "Integrated plant-wide modelling for evaluation of the energy balance and greenhouse gas footprint in large wastewater treatment plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    20. Giuseppe Campo & Antonella Miggiano & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2023. "Enhancing the Energy Efficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants through the Optimization of the Aeration Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5005-:d:418013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.