IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6476-d570214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterisation of Impact Funds and Their Potential in the Context of the 2030 Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Juan C. Santamarta

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Agraria, Náutica, Civil y Marítima, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), 38200 Tenerife, Spain)

  • Mª Dolores Storch de Gracia

    (Grupo de Investigación Organizaciones Sostenibles (GIOS), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Organizational Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Mª Ángeles Huerta Carrascosa

    (Grupo de Investigación Organizaciones Sostenibles (GIOS), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Organizational Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Margarita Martínez-Núñez

    (Department of Organizational Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Celia de las Heras García

    (Department of Organizational Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Noelia Cruz-Pérez

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Agraria, Náutica, Civil y Marítima, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), 38200 Tenerife, Spain)

Abstract

The European Union has incorporated impact investment through two action plans: the Social Entrepreneurship Initiative and the Investment Plan for Europe. These financing tools seek to fund economic growth and promote job creation. Among the different measures carried out, the regulatory framework for impact investment funds stands out, under which the denomination, European Social Entrepreneurship Fund, is established to designate investment funds focused on social enterprises with the objective of generating a positive impact. It is possible to affirm that the creation of a solid impact intermediation infrastructure, by connecting both sides of supply and demand, is a critical aspect for the development and effective functioning of the impact market. Special importance is given to impact funds capable of attracting private capital. In order to categorise the different impact funds according to the most relevant aspects, a proposal form for the characterisation of impact funds has been drawn up and has been applied to a particular case. The presentation of Creas will allow for contextualising the practices that impact funds carry out and facilitate the general understanding of the article through a specific example that is considered successful in Spain.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan C. Santamarta & Mª Dolores Storch de Gracia & Mª Ángeles Huerta Carrascosa & Margarita Martínez-Núñez & Celia de las Heras García & Noelia Cruz-Pérez, 2021. "Characterisation of Impact Funds and Their Potential in the Context of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6476-:d:570214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Félix González, Mónica & Husted, Bryan W. & Aigner, Dennis J., 2017. "Opportunity discovery and creation in social entrepreneurship: An exploratory study in Mexico," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 212-220.
    2. McMullen, Jeffery S. & Bergman, Brian J., 2018. "The promise and problems of price subsidization in social entrepreneurship," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 609-621.
    3. Chantal Hervieux & Annika Voltan, 2018. "Framing Social Problems in Social Entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 279-293, August.
    4. Cherrier, Helene & Goswami, Paromita & Ray, Subhasis, 2018. "Social entrepreneurship: Creating value in the context of institutional complexity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 245-258.
    5. David W. Sims & Nuno Queiroz, 2016. "Unlimited by-catch limits recovery," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7595), pages 448-448, March.
    6. Mukesh Sud & Craig VanSandt & Amanda Baugous, 2009. "Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 201-216, February.
    7. Dwivedi, Abhishek & Weerawardena, Jay, 2018. "Conceptualizing and operationalizing the social entrepreneurship construct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 32-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Freek Van Doninck & Johanna Vanderstraeten & Ine Paeleman & Luc Van Liedekerke, 2021. "Teaching Case: Social Entrepreneurs and Impact Investors: A Match Made in Heaven?—Case Study of Le Champignon de Bruxelles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Gimede Gigante & Emiliano Sironi & Caterina Tridenti, 2023. "At the Frontier of Sustainable Finance: Impact Investing and the Financial Tradeoff; Evidence from Private Portfolio Companies in the United Kingdom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Parul & Chauhan, Sumedha & Paul, Justin & Jaiswal, M.P., 2020. "Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 209-229.
    2. Pradeep Kumar Hota, 2023. "Tracing the Intellectual Evolution of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Advances, Current Trends, and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 637-659, January.
    3. Lortie, Jason & Cox, Kevin C. & Roundy, Philip T., 2022. "Social impact models, legitimacy perceptions, and consumer responses to social ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 312-321.
    4. Diaz-Sarachaga, Jose Manuel & Ariza-Montes, Antonio, 2022. "The role of social entrepreneurship in the attainment of the sustainable development goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 242-250.
    5. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    6. Canestrino, Rossella & Ćwiklicki, Marek & Magliocca, Pierpaolo & Pawełek, Barbara, 2020. "Understanding social entrepreneurship: A cultural perspective in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 132-143.
    7. Rolando Rubilar-Torrealba & Karime Chahuán-Jiménez & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Mercedes Marzo-Navarro, 2022. "Econometric Modeling to Measure the Social and Economic Factors in the Success of Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Cherrier, Helene & Türe, Meltem, 2020. "Value dynamics in ordinary object disposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 221-228.
    9. Päivi Jokela & Maria Elo, 2015. "Developing Innovative Business Models in Social Ventures," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 103-118.
    10. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Asante, Eric Adom & Affum-Osei, Emmanuel, 2019. "Entrepreneurship as a career choice: The impact of locus of control on aspiring entrepreneurs' opportunity recognition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 227-235.
    12. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    13. Qing Yin & Delu Wang & Yadong Wang, 2023. "Serial Mediation Model Linking Returnee Entrepreneurship Education and Green Returnee Entrepreneurial Behavior: An Analysis of Environmental Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    14. I Wayan Ruspendi Junaedi & I Wayan Damayana & Dermawan Waruwu & I Gusti Bagus Rai Utama, 2020. "Social Enterprises through Traditional Cooperation: Love, Joint Responsibility, Portfolio, and Wellbeing," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 12(1), pages 333-346, October.
    15. Babita Bhatt & Israr Qureshi & Suhaib Riaz, 2019. "Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 605-630, February.
    16. Diana M. Hechavarría & Steven A. Brieger, 2022. "Practice rather than preach: cultural practices and female social entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1131-1151, February.
    17. Lang, Le Dang & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hieu, Hoang Ngoc & Ha, Nguyen Minh & Gaur, Jighyasu, 2023. "The role of structural social capital in driving social-oriented sustainable agricultural entrepreneurship," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    18. Jay Sheppard & Maral Mahdad, 2021. "Unpacking Hybrid Organizing in a Born Green Entrepreneurial Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-30, October.
    19. Chatterjee, Ira & Cornelissen, Joep & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "Social entrepreneurship and values work: The role of practices in shaping values and negotiating change," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    20. Kim Clark & Yuan Li, 2023. "Organizational Event Stigma: Typology, Processes, and Stickiness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 511-530, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6476-:d:570214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.