IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5921-d561329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Compression Ratio of Bio-Fueled SI Engines on the Thermal Balance and Waste Heat Recovery Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Qasemian

    (School of Automotive engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, Iran)

  • Sina Jenabi Haghparast

    (School of Automotive engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, Iran)

  • Pouria Azarikhah

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, Iran)

  • Meisam Babaie

    (School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4BR, UK)

Abstract

In internal combustion engines, a significant share of the fuel energy is wasted via the heat losses. This study aims to understand the heat losses and analyze the potential of the waste heat recovery when biofuels are used in SI engines. A numerical model is developed for a single-cylinder, four-stroke and air-cooled SI engine to carry out the waste heat recovery analysis. To verify the numerical solution, experiments are first conducted for the gasoline engine. Biofuels including pure ethanol (E100), E15 (15% ethanol) and E85 (85% ethanol) are then studied using the validated numerical model. Furthermore, the exhaust power to heat loss ratio ( Q ˙ e x / Q ˙ h t ) is investigated for different compression ratios, ethanol fuel content and engine speed to understand the exhaust losses potential in terms of the heat recovery. The results indicate that heat loss to brake power ratio ( Q ˙ h t / W ˙ b ) increases by the increment in the compression ratio. In addition, increasing the compression ratio leads to decreasing the Q ˙ e x / Q ˙ h t ratio for all studied fuels. According to the results, there is a direct relationship between the ethanol in fuel content and Q ˙ e x / Q ˙ h t ratio. As the percentage of ethanol in fuel increases, the Q ˙ e x / Q ˙ h t ratio rises. Thus, the more the ethanol in the fuel and the less the compression ratio, the more the potential for the waste heat recovery of the IC engine. Considering both power and waste heat recovery, the most efficient fuel is E100 due to the highest brake thermal efficiency and Q ˙ e x / Q ˙ h t ratio and E85, E15 and E00 (pure gasoline) come next in the consecutive orders. At the engine speeds and compression ratios examined in this study (3000 to 5000 rpm and a CR of 8 to 11), the maximum efficiency is about 35% at 5000 rpm and the compression ratio of 11 for E100. The minimum percentage of heat loss is 21.62 happening at 5000 rpm and the compression ratio of 8 by E100. The minimum percentage of exhaust loss is 35.8% happening at 3000 rpm and the compression ratio of 11 for E00. The most Q ˙ e x / Q ˙ h t is 2.13 which is related to E100 at the minimum compression ratio of 8.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Qasemian & Sina Jenabi Haghparast & Pouria Azarikhah & Meisam Babaie, 2021. "Effects of Compression Ratio of Bio-Fueled SI Engines on the Thermal Balance and Waste Heat Recovery Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5921-:d:561329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saeid Aghahossein Shirazi & Thomas D. Foust & Kenneth F. Reardon, 2020. "Identification of Promising Alternative Mono-Alcohol Fuel Blend Components for Spark Ignition Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Najafi, G. & Ghobadian, B. & Tavakoli, T. & Buttsworth, D.R. & Yusaf, T.F. & Faizollahnejad, M., 2009. "Performance and exhaust emissions of a gasoline engine with ethanol blended gasoline fuels using artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(5), pages 630-639, May.
    3. Monirul Islam Miskat & Ashfaq Ahmed & Hemal Chowdhury & Tamal Chowdhury & Piyal Chowdhury & Sadiq M. Sait & Young-Kwon Park, 2020. "Assessing the Theoretical Prospects of Bioethanol Production as a Biofuel from Agricultural Residues in Bangladesh: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Cinzia Tornatore & Luca Marchitto & Maria Antonietta Costagliola & Gerardo Valentino, 2019. "Experimental Comparative Study on Performance and Emissions of E85 Adopting Different Injection Approaches in a Turbocharged PFI SI Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Feng, Dengquan & Wei, Haiqiao & Pan, Mingzhang & Zhou, Lei & Hua, Jianxiong, 2018. "Combustion performance of dual-injection using n-butanol direct-injection and gasoline port fuel-injection in a SI engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 573-581.
    6. Niloufar Zabihi & Mohamed Saafi, 2020. "Recent Developments in the Energy Harvesting Systems from Road Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Karol Tucki & Remigiusz Mruk & Olga Orynycz & Andrzej Wasiak & Katarzyna Botwińska & Arkadiusz Gola, 2019. "Simulation of the Operation of a Spark Ignition Engine Fueled with Various Biofuels and Its Contribution to Technology Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Marietta Markiewicz & Łukasz Muślewski, 2019. "The Impact of Powering an Engine with Fuels from Renewable Energy Sources including its Software Modification on a Drive Unit Performance Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Saidur, R. & Rezaei, M. & Muzammil, W.K. & Hassan, M.H. & Paria, S. & Hasanuzzaman, M., 2012. "Technologies to recover exhaust heat from internal combustion engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5649-5659.
    10. Balki, Mustafa Kemal & Sayin, Cenk, 2014. "The effect of compression ratio on the performance, emissions and combustion of an SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with pure ethanol, methanol and unleaded gasoline," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 194-201.
    11. Babu, D. & Karvembu, R. & Anand, R., 2018. "Impact of split injection strategy on combustion, performance and emissions characteristics of biodiesel fuelled common rail direct injection assisted diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 577-592.
    12. Javier Monsalve-Serrano & Giacomo Belgiorno & Gabriele Di Blasio & María Guzmán-Mendoza, 2020. "1D Simulation and Experimental Analysis on the Effects of the Injection Parameters in Methane–Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Yun, Kyung Tae & Cho, Heejin & Luck, Rogelio & Mago, Pedro J., 2013. "Modeling of reciprocating internal combustion engines for power generation and heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 327-335.
    14. Channappagoudra, Manjunath & Ramesh, K. & Manavendra, G., 2019. "Comparative study of standard engine and modified engine with different piston bowl geometries operated with B20 fuel blend," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 216-232.
    15. Bayraktar, Hakan, 2005. "Experimental and theoretical investigation of using gasoline–ethanol blends in spark-ignition engines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 1733-1747.
    16. Thakur, Amit Kumar & Kaviti, Ajay Kumar & Mehra, Roopesh & Mer, K.K.S., 2017. "Progress in performance analysis of ethanol-gasoline blends on SI engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 324-340.
    17. Abedin, M.J. & Masjuki, H.H. & Kalam, M.A. & Sanjid, A. & Rahman, S.M. Ashrafur & Masum, B.M., 2013. "Energy balance of internal combustion engines using alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 20-33.
    18. Choi, Wonjae & Song, Han Ho, 2020. "Composition-considered Woschni heat transfer correlation: Findings from the analysis of over-expected engine heat losses in a solid oxide fuel cell–internal combustion engine hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Jihwan Jang & Jonghui Choi & Hoseung Yi & Sungwook Park, 2020. "Effects of the Bore to Stroke Ratio on Combustion, Gaseous and Particulate Emissions in a Small Port Fuel Injection Engine Fueled with Ethanol Blended Gasoline," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Farooq Sher & Oliver Curnick & Mohammad Tazli Azizan, 2021. "Sustainable Conversion of Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-4, March.
    21. Magín Lapuerta & Rosario Ballesteros & Javier Barba, 2017. "Strategies to Introduce n-Butanol in Gasoline Blends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, T. Sathish & Ashok, B., 2021. "Critical review on combustion phenomena of low carbon alcohols in SI engine with its challenges and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Renzi, Massimiliano & Bietresato, Marco & Mazzetto, Fabrizio, 2016. "An experimental evaluation of the performance of a SI internal combustion engine for agricultural purposes fuelled with different bioethanol blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1069-1080.
    3. Pandey, Jayashish Kumar & Kumar, G.N., 2022. "Effects of hydrogen assisted combustion of EBNOL IN SI engines under variable compression ratio and ignition timing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    4. Thakur, Amit Kumar & Kaviti, Ajay Kumar & Mehra, Roopesh & Mer, K.K.S., 2017. "Progress in performance analysis of ethanol-gasoline blends on SI engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 324-340.
    5. Thangavelu, Saravana Kannan & Ahmed, Abu Saleh & Ani, Farid Nasir, 2016. "Review on bioethanol as alternative fuel for spark ignition engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 820-835.
    6. Awad, Omar I. & Mamat, R. & Ali, Obed M. & Sidik, N.A.C. & Yusaf, T. & Kadirgama, K. & Kettner, Maurice, 2018. "Alcohol and ether as alternative fuels in spark ignition engine: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2586-2605.
    7. Dhande, D.Y. & Nighot, D.V. & Sinaga, Nazaruddin & Dahe, Kiran B., 2021. "Extraction of bioethanol from waste pomegranate fruits as a potential feedstock and its blending effects on a performance of a single cylinder SI engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Süleyman Şimşek & Hasan Saygın & Bülent Özdalyan, 2020. "Improvement of Fusel Oil Features and Effect of Its Use in Different Compression Ratios for an SI Engine on Performance and Emission," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Dhahad, Hayder Abed & Hasan, Ahmed Mudheher & Chaichan, Miqdam Tariq & Kazem, Hussein A., 2022. "Prognostic of diesel engine emissions and performance based on an intelligent technique for nanoparticle additives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    10. Gong, Changming & Liu, Fenghua & Sun, Jingzhen & Wang, Kang, 2016. "Effect of compression ratio on performance and emissions of a stratified-charge DISI (direct injection spark ignition) methanol engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 166-175.
    11. Wei, Liangjie & Cheung, C.S. & Huang, Zuohua, 2014. "Effect of n-pentanol addition on the combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a direct-injection diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 172-180.
    12. Huang, Yuhan & Surawski, Nic C. & Zhuang, Yuan & Zhou, John L. & Hong, Guang, 2021. "Dual injection: An effective and efficient technology to use renewable fuels in spark ignition engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. T. M. Yunus Khan, 2020. "A Review of Performance-Enhancing Innovative Modifications in Biodiesel Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Han, Dandan & E, Jiaqiang & Deng, Yuanwang & Chen, Jingwei & Leng, Erwei & Liao, Gaoliang & Zhao, Xiaohuan & Feng, Changling & Zhang, Feng, 2021. "A review of studies using hydrocarbon adsorption material for reducing hydrocarbon emissions from cold start of gasoline engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    15. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    16. Suleyman Simsek & Bulent Ozdalyan, 2018. "Improvements to the Composition of Fusel Oil and Analysis of the Effects of Fusel Oil–Gasoline Blends on a Spark-Ignited (SI) Engine’s Performance and Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Catapano, F. & Di Iorio, S. & Magno, A. & Sementa, P. & Vaglieco, B.M., 2015. "A comprehensive analysis of the effect of ethanol, methane and methane-hydrogen blend on the combustion process in a PFI (port fuel injection) engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 101-110.
    18. Awad, Omar I. & Mamat, R. & Ibrahim, Thamir K. & Hammid, Ali Thaeer & Yusri, I.M. & Hamidi, Mohd Adnin & Humada, Ali M. & Yusop, A.F., 2018. "Overview of the oxygenated fuels in spark ignition engine: Environmental and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 394-408.
    19. Roussos G. Papagiannakis & Dimitrios C. Rakopoulos & Constantine D. Rakopoulos, 2017. "Theoretical Study of the Effects of Spark Timing on the Performance and Emissions of a Light-Duty Spark Ignited Engine Running under Either Gasoline or Ethanol or Butanol Fuel Operating Modes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Fridrichová, K. & Drápal, L. & Vopařil, J. & Dlugoš, J., 2021. "Overview of the potential and limitations of cylinder deactivation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5921-:d:561329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.