IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p3045-d344057.html

Crisis Response and Supervision System for Food Security: A Comparative Analysis between Mainland China and Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Chieh Ma

    (Department of Public Administration and Management, National University of Tainan, No.33, Sec. 2, Shu-Lin St., Tainan 70005, Taiwan)

  • Han-Shen Chen

    (Department of Health Diet and Industry Management, Chung Shan Medical University, No.110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung City 40201, Taiwan
    Department of Medical Management, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung City 40201, Taiwan)

  • Hsiao-Ping Chang

    (Department of Health Diet and Industry Management, Chung Shan Medical University, No.110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung City 40201, Taiwan
    Department of Medical Management, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung City 40201, Taiwan)

Abstract

In Mainland China, major food security incidents have occurred with high frequency, of which the number and degree of harm are both increasing. At the same time, Taiwan’s food security crisis has also been spreading. For these reasons, this article makes a comparative analysis of food security issues between Mainland China and Taiwan from a legal point of view and identifies the blind spots of the legal system and supervision using official documents and research papers regarding the most typical incidents in the period of 2008–2019. The results indicate that, compared with Mainland China, Taiwan has a better food security supervision system, and its experience with the supervision system, specific rules, social supervision, and responsibility is worth investigating. However, while there are loopholes in criminal law in Mainland China, which has not formed a complete system, criminal law in Taiwan is also weak in terms of regulation of food security incidents. Based on the results, this article puts forward suggestions with the expectation that, in the face of an increasingly severe food security crisis, Mainland China and Taiwan will strengthen their cooperation in constructing legal systems for food security supervision and inspection, exchange experience, cooperate in inspection, and share food security information to avoid rumors of food insecurity circulating in popular science. It is expected that the results and suggestions of this study will be helpful in the crisis response, as well as in the supervision systems in Mainland China and Taiwan for guarding food security. Although the comparative analysis is specific to the two regions, its characteristics are typical of food security globally, especially in Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Chieh Ma & Han-Shen Chen & Hsiao-Ping Chang, 2020. "Crisis Response and Supervision System for Food Security: A Comparative Analysis between Mainland China and Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:3045-:d:344057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/3045/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/3045/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baker, Gregory A., 2003. "Food Safety And Fear: Factors Affecting Consumer Response To Food Safety Risk," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 6(01), pages 1-11.
    2. Youzhu Li & Xianghui Gao & Mingying Du & Rui He & Shanshan Yang & Jason Xiong, 2020. "What Causes Different Sentiment Classification on Social Network Services? Evidence from Weibo with Genetically Modified Food in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Pei, Xiaofang & Tandon, Annuradha & Alldrick, Anton & Giorgi, Liana & Huang, Wei & Yang, Ruijia, 2011. "The China melamine milk scandal and its implications for food safety regulation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 412-420, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burggraf, Christine & Kuhn, Lena & Zhao, Qiran & Glauben, Thomas & Teuber, Ramona, 2014. "Economic growth and nutrition transition: an empirical study comparing demand elasticities for foods in China and Russia," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182828, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. JIANG, Qijun & FLORKOWSKI, Wojciech Jan, . "Factors Limiting Quality Assurance Program Implementation In Food Manufacturing Companies In Shanghai, China," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 24(01).
    3. Wojciech J. Florkowski & Qijun Jiang, 2017. "Constraints in Implementing Quality Assurance Programs in Food Manufacturing Firms in Shanghai, China," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2017),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    4. Flavio Boccia & Rosa Malgeri Manzo & Daniela Covino, 2019. "Consumer behavior and corporate social responsibility: An evaluation by a choice experiment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 97-105, January.
    5. Li-Chun Huang, 2019. "Consumer Attitude, Concerns, and Brand Acceptance for the Vegetables Cultivated with Sustainable Plant Factory Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Jasmin Wehner & Xiaohua Yu, 2023. "Carbon tax on milk products and the exact consumer welfare measure in emerging economies," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1595-1623, December.
    7. Geng, Wei & Trienekens, Jacques & Wubben, Emiel F.M., 2013. "Improving Food Safety within China’s Dairy Chain: Key Issues of Compliance with QA Standards," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Yubao Cui & Luca Cacciolatti & Patrick Woock & Yinghua Liu & Xuehe Zhang, 2016. "A Qualitative Exploratory Investigation on the Purchase Intention of Consumers Affected by Long-term Negative Advertising: A Case from the Chinese Milk Sector," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 18(3), pages 263-282.
    9. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Roberto Manno & Marco Tappi & Emilia Lamonaca, 2022. "Trademarks and Territorial Marketing: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses of the trademark Prodotti di Qualità," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(1), pages 1-37.
    10. Lyle Fearnley, 2025. "Chicken from the soil: qualifying local chicken amidst food distrust in southwestern China," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 1623-1635, September.
    11. Chen, Yuyang & Bi, Kaiming & Zhao, Songnian & Ben-Arieh, David & Wu, Chih-Hang John, 2017. "Modeling individual fear factor with optimal control in a disease-dynamic system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 531-545.
    12. Huidan Xue & Chenguang Li & Liming Wang, 2021. "Spatial Price Dynamics and Asymmetric Price Transmission in Skim Milk Powder International Trade: Evidence from Export Prices for New Zealand and Ireland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Yingxue Ren & Runzeng Gao & Min Zhang & Maotong Cheng, 2026. "Willingness to Pay for Traceability in the Post‐Fukushima Nuclear‐Contaminated Water Era: Chinese Consumers’ Attitudes and Preferences for Seafood," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 553-568, April.
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0195817 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Jiang, Qijun & Florkowski, Wojciech J., "undated". "What factors limit quality assurance program implementation in Shanghai’s food manufacturing companies?," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258266, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Jia, Xiangping & Huang, Jikun & Luan, Hao & Rozelle, Scott & Swinnen, Johan, 2012. "China’s Milk Scandal, government policy and production decisions of dairy farmers: The case of Greater Beijing," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 390-400.
    17. Kim, Byeong Je & Chung, Ji-Bum, 2021. "When beef consumption becomes politicized: Longitudinal change of US beef purchase intention and political values in Korea," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    18. Zhenzhong Si & Theresa Schumilas & Steffanie Scott, 2015. "Characterizing alternative food networks in China," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(2), pages 299-313, June.
    19. Hoffmann, Vivian & Moser, Christine & Saak, Alexander, 2019. "Food safety in low and middle-income countries: The evidence through an economic lens," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Jan Mei Soon & Richard N. Baines, 2013. "Public and Private Food Safety Standards: Facilitating or Frustrating Fresh Produce Growers?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    21. Heo, Seong-Yoon & Kim, Sanghyo & Zulauf, Carl & Lee, Kye-Im, "undated". "Satisfaction with Food Policies for Consumer: A Case Study of South Korea," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236145, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:3045-:d:344057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.