IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8133-d422891.html

Scenario Analysis for Incremental Community Planning in an African Context

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Restrepo Arias

    (Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Polytechnic University of Turin, 10125 Turin, Italy)

  • Sara Torabi Moghadam

    (Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Polytechnic University of Turin, 10125 Turin, Italy)

  • Patrizia Lombardi

    (Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Polytechnic University of Turin, 10125 Turin, Italy)

Abstract

Urban areas are gradually becoming more viable places in terms of life quality than most rural areas. This phenomenon generates human movements, both at a local and at an international scale, the latter usually being labeled as irregular migration. This study aims at analyzing urban scenario proposals that part from incremental urbanism principles to create opportunities for youth and women in the area of Pikine Est (Senegal), a neighborhood with a high vocation toward migration. An integrated planning approach is proposed, where an initial project identification stage reveals through documentary analysis and discussion the adequate project strategies to apply and shines a light on proper life quality indicators (LQIs). In the successive stage, project formulation, future-oriented scenarios are proposed. Finally, at the evaluation stage, each urban scenario is assessed to determine which one contains a more suitable set of strategies in function of the community’s needs, employing multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) methods. As a result, this study proves through measurable data that assessing incremental urban interventions makes sense in developing communities, not only as a study of their response to scarce financial resources, but also as means to overcome and avoid environmental issues that cities face at a global scale today.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Restrepo Arias & Sara Torabi Moghadam & Patrizia Lombardi, 2020. "Scenario Analysis for Incremental Community Planning in an African Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8133-:d:422891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2012. "Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 51, pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Christian Alexander Hudak & Tadej Brezina & Johannes Kehrer & Josef Michael Schopf, 2023. "Tracing rail transformation: the case of passenger services in Slovenia from 1975 to 2015," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 253-274, March.
    2. Apantri Peungnumsai & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Apichon Witayangkurn & Sohee Minsun Kim, 2020. "A Grid-Based Spatial Analysis for Detecting Supply–Demand Gaps of Public Transports: A Case Study of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Castillo, Cristian & Alvarez-Palau, Eduard J. & Calvet, Laura & Panadero, Javier & Viu-Roig, Marta & Serena-Latre, Anna & Juan, Angel A., 2024. "Home healthcare in Spanish rural areas: Applying vehicle routing algorithms to health transport management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Saiyad, Gulnazbanu & Srivastava, Minal & Rathwa, Dipak, 2022. "Exploring determinants of feeder mode choice behavior using Artificial Neural Network: Evidences from Delhi metro," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 598(C).
    5. Chowdhury, Subeh & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2016. "Users’ willingness to ride an integrated public-transport service: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 183-195.
    6. Bruzzone, Francesco & Cavallaro, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2021. "The integration of passenger and freight transport for first-last mile operations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 31-48.
    7. Juan Oña & Rocío Oña & Griselda López, 2016. "Transit service quality analysis using cluster analysis and decision trees: a step forward to personalized marketing in public transportation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 725-747, September.
    8. Puteri Paramita & Zuduo Zheng & Md Mazharul Haque & Simon Washington & Paul Hyland, 2018. "User satisfaction with train fares: A comparative analysis in five Australian cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Eboli, Laura & Forciniti, Carmen & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2018. "Spatial variation of the perceived transit service quality at rail stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 67-83.
    10. Márquez, Luis & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2014. "How are comfort and safety perceived by inland waterway transport passengers?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 46-52.
    11. Adrian Barchański & Renata Żochowska & Marcin Jacek Kłos, 2022. "A Method for the Identification of Critical Interstop Sections in Terms of Introducing Electric Buses in Public Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-37, October.
    12. Rong, Rui & Liu, Lishan & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "Impact analysis of actual traveling performance on bus passenger’s perception and satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 80-100.
    13. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Emilia T. Skupień & Mateusz Rydlewski, 2021. "Method of Assessing Bus Stops Safety Based on Three Groups of Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    14. Echaniz, Eneko & dell’Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Ángel, 2018. "Modelling perceived quality for urban public transport systems using weighted variables and random parameters," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 31-39.
    15. Benedetto Barabino & Nicola Aldo Cabras & Claudio Conversano & Alessandro Olivo, 2020. "An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 1045-1080, June.
    16. Faivre d'Arcier, Bruno, 2014. "Measuring the performance of urban public transport in relation to public policy objectives," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 67-76.
    17. Bajada, Thérèse & Titheridge, Helena, 2016. "To contract or to operate publicly? Observations from the bus service reform transition process in Malta," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 281-291.
    18. Carreira, Rui & Patrício, Lia & Natal Jorge, Renato & Magee, Chris, 2014. "Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions and loyalty towards the transportation provider–A quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 35-46.
    19. Abiodun Aminu, PhD* Suraju & Adeolu Shodiya Olumuyiwa & Olaniyi Adeoti Ibrahim, 2022. "Service Quality Of Bus Rapid Transit (Brt) Along The Ikorodu Corridors, Lagos State, Nigeria," Ilorin Journal of Business and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ilorin, vol. 24(2), pages 91-108.
    20. Gal-Tzur, Ayelet & Grant-Muller, Susan M. & Kuflik, Tsvi & Minkov, Einat & Nocera, Silvio & Shoor, Itay, 2014. "The potential of social media in delivering transport policy goals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 115-123.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8133-:d:422891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.