IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8275-d600550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method of Assessing Bus Stops Safety Based on Three Groups of Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka A. Tubis

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Emilia T. Skupień

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Mateusz Rydlewski

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

Bus stops are an essential element of the public transport system and affect its users’ safety level. They are where the passengers gather who want to use bus transport, and where vehicles stop to exchange passenger flows. Most studies devoted to assessing bus stops’ safety focus on two evaluation methods: (1) statistical analysis of traffic crash data and (2) traffic conflict analysis. However, there is a need to develop a methodology to define priorities and scope for the improvement of increasing bus stops’ safety. For this reason, the aim of the article is to present a method of assessing bus stops’ safety, which is dedicated to the process of auditing and designing point infrastructure in the city. The use of the proposed method of evaluating bus stops is aimed not only at determining the current status, but above all at assigning priorities to actions aimed at increasing safety and improving the quality of life of residents. The article presents in detail the algorithm of the research procedure consisting of the proposed method and its implementation for the evaluation of stops in a selected city. In total, 151 bus stops serving all fast lines in the studied agglomeration were assessed. As part of the results, the ratings obtained by individual stops were presented. The level of fulfilment of individual evaluation criteria, divided into conducted classification procedures, was also analysed. The implementation of the method in the real system allowed us to assess the correctness of the procedure and the usefulness of the obtained results. The obtained results of the evaluation of bus stops and the fulfilment of individual criteria should constitute the basis for the created schedules of the required ongoing works related to the improvement of public transport passenger safety, but also the creation of long-term plans related to the improvement of the bus stop infrastructure and its adaptation to changing safety requirements and passengers’ expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka A. Tubis & Emilia T. Skupień & Mateusz Rydlewski, 2021. "Method of Assessing Bus Stops Safety Based on Three Groups of Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8275-:d:600550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2011. "A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger's point of view," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 172-181, January.
    2. Maria Vittoria Corazza & Nicola Favaretto, 2019. "A Methodology to Evaluate Accessibility to Bus Stops as a Contribution to Improve Sustainability in Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Margareta Friman & Katrin Lättman & Lars E. Olsson, 2020. "Public Transport Quality, Safety, and Perceived Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2012. "Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 51, pages 1-4.
    5. Benedetto Barabino, 2018. "Automatic recognition of “low-quality” vehicles and bus stops in bus services," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 257-289, August.
    6. Delbosc, Alexa & Currie, Graham, 2012. "Modelling the causes and impacts of personal safety perceptions on public transport ridership," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 302-309.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renata Żochowska & Marcin Jacek Kłos & Piotr Soczówka & Marcin Pilch, 2022. "Assessment of Accessibility of Public Transport by Using Temporal and Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Mateusz Rydlewski & Agnieszka A. Tubis, 2022. "Criteria for Assessing the Safety and Functionality of Tram Stops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Adrian Barchański & Renata Żochowska & Marcin Jacek Kłos, 2022. "A Method for the Identification of Critical Interstop Sections in Terms of Introducing Electric Buses in Public Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-37, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedetto Barabino & Nicola Aldo Cabras & Claudio Conversano & Alessandro Olivo, 2020. "An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 1045-1080, June.
    2. Daimi, Sarra & Rebai, Sonia, 2023. "Sustainability performance assessment of Tunisian public transport companies: AHP and ANP approaches," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Gal-Tzur, Ayelet & Grant-Muller, Susan M. & Kuflik, Tsvi & Minkov, Einat & Nocera, Silvio & Shoor, Itay, 2014. "The potential of social media in delivering transport policy goals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 115-123.
    4. Rafal Stachyra & Kamil Roman, 2021. "Analysis of Accessibility of Public Transport in Warsaw in the Opinion of Users," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 384-403, August.
    5. Pierluigi Coppola & Fulvio Silvestri, 2021. "Gender Inequality in Safety and Security Perceptions in Railway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Ahmed Derbel & Younes Boujelbene, 2023. "Performance classification of Tunisian public transport operators," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 535-574, June.
    7. Mahmood Mahmoodi Nesheli & Avishai (Avi) Ceder & Robin Brissaud, 2017. "Public transport service-quality elements based on real-time operational tactics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 957-975, September.
    8. Chowdhury, Subeh & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2016. "Users’ willingness to ride an integrated public-transport service: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 183-195.
    9. Mingzhu Song & Yi Zhang & Meng Li & Yi Zhang, 2021. "Accessibility of Transit Stops with Multiple Feeder Modes: Walking and Private-Bike Cycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    10. Verbich, David & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2016. "The pursuit of satisfaction: Variation in satisfaction with bus transit service among riders with encumbrances and riders with disabilities using a large-scale survey from London, UK," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 64-71.
    11. Eboli, Laura & Forciniti, Carmen & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2018. "Spatial variation of the perceived transit service quality at rail stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 67-83.
    12. Márquez, Luis & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2014. "How are comfort and safety perceived by inland waterway transport passengers?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 46-52.
    13. Rong, Rui & Liu, Lishan & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "Impact analysis of actual traveling performance on bus passenger’s perception and satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 80-100.
    14. Chitresh KUMAR & Anirban GANGULY, 2018. "Travelling Together But Differently: Comparing Variations In Public Transit User Mode Choice Attributes Across New Delhi And New York," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 54-73, August.
    15. Salonen, Arto O., 2018. "Passenger's subjective traffic safety, in-vehicle security and emergency management in the driverless shuttle bus in Finland," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 106-110.
    16. Echaniz, Eneko & dell’Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Ángel, 2018. "Modelling perceived quality for urban public transport systems using weighted variables and random parameters," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 31-39.
    17. Camille Kamga & Richard Kish & Sandeep Mudigonda & Rodrigue Tchamna, 2023. "Utilizing Social Media Data for Estimating Transit Performance Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Faivre d'Arcier, Bruno, 2014. "Measuring the performance of urban public transport in relation to public policy objectives," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 67-76.
    19. Weiya Chen & Zixuan Kang & Xiaoping Fang & Jiajia Li, 2020. "Design a Semantic Scale for Passenger Perceived Quality Surveys of Urban Rail Transit: Within Attribute’s Service Condition and Rider’s Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Dong, Hongming & Ma, Shoufeng & Jia, Ning & Tian, Junfang, 2021. "Understanding public transport satisfaction in post COVID-19 pandemic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 81-88.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8275-:d:600550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.