IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8095-d422333.html

Temporary Uses of Urban Brownfields for Creative Activities in a Post-Socialist City. Case Study: Timișoara (Romania)

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra-Camelia Marian-Potra

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology and Geography, West University of Timișoara, 4 Bd. Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Ramona Ișfănescu-Ivan

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology and Geography, West University of Timișoara, 4 Bd. Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Sorin Pavel

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology and Geography, West University of Timișoara, 4 Bd. Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Cătălina Ancuța

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology and Geography, West University of Timișoara, 4 Bd. Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

Abstract

The linking (in terms of functional use) of brownfield sites with creative spaces is a frequently encountered phenomenon in western European, post-communist, and industrialized countries in general and is viewed as a way of revitalizing, repurposing, or simply making temporary use of them. It may also be seen in the municipality of Timișoara in Romania, where 12 creative spaces, each involving one or more kinds of functionalities (coworking space, maker space, community space, event space, incubator), are operating on such sites. A content analysis of interviews with those in charge of these 12 creative spaces brought to light, on the one hand, the opportunities represented by the existence of derelict industrial spaces, as represented by their large size, low rents, and innate flexibility, but on the other the reality of a number of long-term constraints on the use of these spaces, given the financial instability of cultural operators, the limited numbers of the public who are interested in creative activities of this kind, and, most seriously, the development pressure exerted by some real-estate developers on derelict industrial spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra-Camelia Marian-Potra & Ramona Ișfănescu-Ivan & Sorin Pavel & Cătălina Ancuța, 2020. "Temporary Uses of Urban Brownfields for Creative Activities in a Post-Socialist City. Case Study: Timișoara (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8095-:d:422333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clara Volintiru and Dumitru Miron, 2015. "Business Environment and Creative Industries in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 358-358, February.
    2. Jason Potts & Stuart Cunningham & John Hartley & Paul Ormerod, 2008. "Social network markets: a new definition of the creative industries," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(3), pages 167-185, September.
    3. Victor Mulas & Anastasia Nedayvoda & Ghia Zaatari, 2017. "Creative Community Spaces," World Bank Publications - Reports 28329, The World Bank Group.
    4. Herman Aguinis & Angelo M. Solarino, 2019. "Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1291-1315, August.
    5. Xabier Gainza, 2018. "Industrial spaces for grassroots creative production: spatial, social and planning facets," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 792-811, April.
    6. Yu-Yun Liu & Yin-Hao Chiu, 2017. "Evaluation of the Policy of the Creative Industry for Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Ana Bobirca & Alina Draghici & Sorin Dumitrescu & Oana Mihut, 2009. "Masurarea Economiei Creative – Studiu de caz România," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 12(34), pages 117-144, (4).
    8. Lauren Andres & Oleg Golubchikov, 2016. "The Limits to Artist-Led Regeneration: Creative Brownfields in the Cities of High Culture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 757-775, July.
    9. Alessandro Rigolon & Jeremy Németh, 2020. "Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 402-420, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ, 2022. "Culture-Led Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield Hosting Temporary Uses: A Post-Socialist Context–Case Study from Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Ioan Sebastian JUCU, 2022. "When Service-Led Activities and Tertiarization Processes Replace Old Industries and Local Brownfields: Changes, Perceptions and Perspectives in the Northern Industrial Area of Lugoj, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Nicolae Popa & Alexandru Dragan & Alexandra-Camelia Marian-Potra & Marius Lupsa Matichescu, 2022. "Opportunities: Source of synergy, or of conflict? Positioning of creative industry actors within a European Capital of Culture Project," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Andrzej Długoński & Diana Dushkova, 2021. "The Hidden Potential of Informal Urban Greenspace: An Example of Two Former Landfills in Post-Socialist Cities (Central Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dejana Nedučin & Milena Krklješ, 2022. "Culture-Led Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield Hosting Temporary Uses: A Post-Socialist Context–Case Study from Novi Sad, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Fikri Zul Fahmi, 2016. "Business networks, social capital and the productivity of creative industries in Indonesia," ERSA conference papers ersa16p351, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Panourgias, Nikiforos S. & Nandhakumar, Joe & Scarbrough, Harry, 2014. "Entanglements of creative agency and digital technology: A sociomaterial study of computer game development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 111-126.
    4. Michael Hutter, 2011. "Experience Goods," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Urrila, Laura & Eva, Nathan, 2024. "Developing oneself to serve others? Servant leadership practices of mindfulness-trained leaders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Buyukbalci, Pinar & Sanguineti, Francesca & Sacco, Federica, 2024. "Rejuvenating business models via startup collaborations: Evidence from the Turkish context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Akhil Bhardwaj & Anastasia Sergeeva & Joseph Mahoney & Jackson Nickerson, 2025. "Theorizing as Problem Solving: A Pragmatist Perspective on the Logic of Pursuit," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 338-359, December.
    8. Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon, 2021. "Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Yasser Jezzini & Ghiwa Assaf & Rayan H. Assaad, 2023. "Models and Methods for Quantifying the Environmental, Economic, and Social Benefits and Challenges of Green Infrastructure: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-40, May.
    10. Ryan, James C. & A Tipu, Syed A., 2022. "Business and management research: Low instances of replication studies and a lack of author independence in replications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    11. Maria Giovina Pasca & Gabriella Arcese, 2025. "Sustainability and Quality of Cultured Meat: Consumer Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Diana-Cristina SAVA & Alina BADULESCU, 2018. "Dimensions And Performances Of The Creative Economy In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 223-232, November.
    13. Homero Rodríguez-Insuasti & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Otto Suárez-Rodríguez & Marcela Yonfá-Medranda & Katherine Parrales-Guerrero, 2022. "Creative Economy: A Worldwide Research in Business, Management and Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Robin A. Chang, 2021. "How Do Scholars Communicate the ‘Temporary Turn’ in Urban Studies? A Socio-Semiotic Framework," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 133-145.
    15. Bakhshi, Hasan & Freeman, Alan & Desai, Radhika, 2010. "Not Rocket Science: A Roadmap for Arts and Cultural R&D," MPRA Paper 52710, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jan 2010.
    16. Aleck Chao-Hung Lin, 2023. "Emerging Key Elements of a Business Model for Sustaining the Cultural and Creative Industries in the Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Linlin Yao & Paravee Maneejuk & Woraphon Yamaka & Jianxu Liu, 2022. "Quantifying the Competitiveness of Cultural Industry and Its Impacts on Chinese Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Yip, Jeremy A. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2022. "Norms for Behavioral Change (NBC) model: How injunctive norms and enforcement shift descriptive norms in science," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Tabares, Sabrina & Dionisio, Marcelo & Parida, Vinit, 2025. "Leveraging corporate social innovation by hybrid organizations: A strategic perspective from B Corps in Latin America," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. Janet Merkel, 2024. "Spatial Politics of Cultural Production: Negotiating Workspaces and Resisting Displacement at Industrial Heritage Sites in Berlin," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8095-:d:422333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.