IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7716-d415432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Quality in the Hami Oasis Based on RSEI

Author

Listed:
  • Pengwen Gao

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Urbanization Development Research Center of the Silk Road Economic Belt, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Alimujiang Kasimu

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Urbanization Development Research Center of the Silk Road Economic Belt, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Yongyu Zhao

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Urbanization Development Research Center of the Silk Road Economic Belt, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Bing Lin

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Jinpeng Chai

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Urbanization Development Research Center of the Silk Road Economic Belt, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Tuersunayi Ruzi

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Urbanization Development Research Center of the Silk Road Economic Belt, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

  • Hemiao Zhao

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
    Urbanization Development Research Center of the Silk Road Economic Belt, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)

Abstract

Given the restrictions on special geographic locations in development processes, the measurement and analysis of the ecological quality of the Hami Oasis are of great significance for the protection of this fragile oasis. In this study, the ecological quality of the Hami Oasis was monitored by constructing a remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) for arid areas. Using the standard deviation ellipse and moving window method, the ecological status and space–time changes were explored for both their external and internal factors in the Hami Oasis. Finally, a geo-detector was employed to determine the driving factors of the ecological quality of the Hami Oasis. The results revealed that: (1) In the remote sensing ecological index constructed in the Hami Oasis, the main influencing factors were dryness and wetness. The average value of the ecological quality of the oasis was less than 0.5, and the ecological quality level was relatively poor. Among the five grades of ecological quality in the Hami Oasis, the poor grade and the good grade showed the largest changes, decreasing by 200 and increasing by 300, respectively, which were mainly concentrated in the periphery of the oasis. (2) The improved ecological quality of the Hami Oasis was mainly manifested in the expansion of the artificial oasis, while the deteriorated area was manifested as an increase in the built-up area. Moreover, the ecological quality of the Hami Oasis presented a ringlike nesting distribution pattern from the internal built-up area to the artificial oasis periphery. (3) The external expansion direction of the ecological quality of the Hami Oasis featured southeast–northwest expansion, which was consistent with the direction of the rivers and traffic roads. The transformation between different ecological qualities in the oasis and the expansion of the built-up area were the reasons for the fragmentation of the Hami Oasis’ landscape. (4) Compared to a single factor, the dual-factor for the ecological quality of the Hami Oasis had stronger explanatory power. Moreover, changes in land use types caused changes in the ecological quality of the Hami Oasis. During the study period, we found that human activities had a more significant impact than natural factors on the development of the Hami Oasis. (5) The Moran’s I Index increased from 0.835268 in 2000 to 0.923976 in 2018, and the p values in the study area all reached a 0.05 significant level. At the same time, the areas with p values above the 0.01 and 0.001 significant levels have also increased significantly in the past 18 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengwen Gao & Alimujiang Kasimu & Yongyu Zhao & Bing Lin & Jinpeng Chai & Tuersunayi Ruzi & Hemiao Zhao, 2020. "Evaluation of the Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Quality in the Hami Oasis Based on RSEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7716-:d:415432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deshan Li & Rongwei Wu, 2018. "A Dynamic Analysis of Green Productivity Growth for Cities in Xinjiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Siebert, Stefan & Nagieb, Maher & Buerkert, Andreas, 2007. "Climate and irrigation water use of a mountain oasis in northern Oman," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Qin Liu & Zhaoping Yang & Fang Han & Hui Shi & Zhi Wang & Xiaodong Chen, 2019. "Ecological Environment Assessment in World Natural Heritage Site Based on Remote-Sensing Data. A Case Study from the Bayinbuluke," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Ju, Weimin & Gao, Ping & Wang, Jun & Zhou, Yanlian & Zhang, Xuehui, 2010. "Combining an ecological model with remote sensing and GIS techniques to monitor soil water content of croplands with a monsoon climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(8), pages 1221-1231, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiyun Chen & Renrong Chen & Quan Guo & Yinglong Hu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Change of Urban Ecologic Environment Quality Based on RSEI—Taking Meizhou City, China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Qifei Zhang & Congjian Sun & Yaning Chen & Wei Chen & Yanyun Xiang & Jiao Li & Yuting Liu, 2022. "Recent Oasis Dynamics and Ecological Security in the Tarim River Basin, Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Weihua Liao, 2023. "Using Knowledge Granularity Entropy to Measure Eco-Environmental Impacts of Land Cover Changes in ASEAN from 2001 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Kaili Zhang & Rongrong Feng & Zhicheng Zhang & Chun Deng & Hongjuan Zhang & Kang Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Driving Factors of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Changes from the Perspective of Geospatial Differentiation: A Case Study of the Weihe River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Ji Zhang & Pei Zhang & Xinchen Gu & Mingjiang Deng & Xiaoying Lai & Aihua Long & Xiaoya Deng, 2023. "Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Pattern Changes and Driving Forces of Xinjiang Plain Oases Based on Geodetector," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Chan Lu & Lei Shi & Lihua Fu & Simian Liu & Jianqiao Li & Zhenchun Mo, 2023. "Urban Ecological Environment Quality Evaluation and Territorial Spatial Planning Response: Application to Changsha, Central China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Yongbin Zhang & Tanglei Song & Jihao Fan & Weidong Man & Mingyue Liu & Yongqiang Zhao & Hao Zheng & Yahui Liu & Chunyu Li & Jingru Song & Xiaowu Yang & Junmin Du, 2022. "Land Use and Climate Change Altered the Ecological Quality in the Luanhe River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Yu Fang & Xulian Wang & Yufei Cheng & Zhongjing Wang, 2022. "Oasis Change Characteristics and Influencing Factors in the Shiyang River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Na Chen & Gang Cheng & Jie Yang & Huan Ding & Shi He, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Ecological Environment Quality Based on Improved RSEI and Driving Factors Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Chen & Kangning Xiong & Xiaodong Ren & Cai Cheng, 2021. "Vulnerability Comparison between Karst and Non-Karst Nature Reserves—With a Special Reference to Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Pastor, Jesus T. & Lovell, C.A. Knox & Aparicio, Juan, 2020. "Defining a new graph inefficiency measure for the proportional directional distance function and introducing a new Malmquist productivity index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(1), pages 222-230.
    3. Yi Liu & Jie Xue & Dongwei Gui & Jiaqiang Lei & Huaiwei Sun & Guanghui Lv & Zhiwei Zhang, 2018. "Agricultural Oasis Expansion and Its Impact on Oasis Landscape Patterns in the Southern Margin of Tarim Basin, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Chao Li & Xuemei Li & Dongliang Luo & Yi He & Fangfang Chen & Bo Zhang & Qiyong Qin, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Pattern of Vegetation Ecology Quality and Its Response to Climate Change between 2000–2017 in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Xi Qin & Xiaoling Wang & Yusen Xu & Yawen Wei, 2019. "Exploring Driving Forces of Green Growth: Empirical Analysis on China’s Iron and Steel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, February.
    6. Ning Zhang & Kangning Xiong & Hua Xiao & Juan Zhang & Chuhong Shen, 2023. "Ecological Environment Dynamic Monitoring and Driving Force Analysis of Karst World Heritage Sites Based on Remote-Sensing: A Case Study of Shibing Karst," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Zhi Wang & Zhaoping Yang & Hui Shi & Fang Han & Qin Liu & Jianwei Qi & Yayan Lu, 2020. "Ecosystem Health Assessment of World Natural Heritage Sites Based on Remote Sensing and Field Sampling Verification: Bayanbulak as Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Huan Tang & Jiawei Fang & Ruijie Xie & Xiuli Ji & Dayong Li & Jing Yuan, 2022. "Impact of Land Cover Change on a Typical Mining Region and Its Ecological Environment Quality Evaluation Using Remote Sensing Based Ecological Index (RSEI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Ruxue Shi & Pingtao Yi & Weiwei Li & Lu Wang, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Autonomous Regions in China Using GRA-SPA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Iglesias, Ana & Garrote, Luis, 2015. "Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate change in Europe," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 113-124.
    11. Andreas Buerkert & Eduardo Fernandez & Beke Tietjen & Eike Luedeling, 2020. "Revisiting climate change effects on winter chill in mountain oases of northern Oman," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1399-1417, October.
    12. Guoyi Cui & Yan Zhang & Feihang Shi & Wenxia Jia & Bohua Pan & Changkun Han & Zhengze Liu & Min Li & Haohao Zhou, 2022. "Study of Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Factors of Habitat Quality: A Case Study of the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone in Northern Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Eyad Abushandi & Manar Al Ajmi, 2022. "Assessment of Hydrological Extremes for Arid Catchments: A Case Study in Wadi Al Jizzi, North-West Oman," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    14. González-Dugo, M.P. & Escuin, S. & Cano, F. & Cifuentes, V. & Padilla, F.L.M. & Tirado, J.L. & Oyonarte, N. & Fernández, P. & Mateos, L., 2013. "Monitoring evapotranspiration of irrigated crops using crop coefficients derived from time series of satellite images. II. Application on basin scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 92-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7716-:d:415432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.