IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6864-d403259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of EPD System for Designing New Building Materials: The Case Study of a Bio-Based Thermal Insulation Panel from the Pineapple Industry By-Product

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Armando Arellano-Vazquez

    (Facultad de Arquitectura y Diseño and Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50100, Mexico)

  • Luca Moreschi

    (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering (DICCA), University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy)

  • Adriana Del Borghi

    (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering (DICCA), University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy)

  • Michela Gallo

    (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering (DICCA), University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy)

  • Gustavo Islas Valverde

    (Facultad de Arquitectura y Diseño and Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50100, Mexico)

  • Miguel Mayorga Rojas

    (Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50210, Mexico)

  • Lorena Romero-Salazar

    (Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50210, Mexico)

  • Juan Carlos Arteaga-Arcos

    (Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca 50210, Mexico)

Abstract

This study shows the benefits of using the environmental product declarations (EPDs), based on ISO 14025:2013, for the configuration and conceptualization of new building materials. Using a quantitative evaluation on these phases of design, it allows one to create materials with lower impacts, in comparison with the existing ones. In this paper, it is proposed to evaluate the potentiality of this tool in the development of a panel from pineapple by-products from agroindustry, used as a thermal insulator. The issue of environmental sustainability was pursued, employing the assessment of the environmental impacts according to characterization methods defined by the International EPD ® System. By comparing the possible compositions of the materials under development, with certified environmental declarations of commercial materials, it is possible to identify and select optimal compositions decreasing up to 98.28% of impacts in acidification potential or up to 99.38% for photochemical oxidation—with respect to traditional materials—already at the design stage, where the changes on the composition or the facilities decision have fewer complications.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Armando Arellano-Vazquez & Luca Moreschi & Adriana Del Borghi & Michela Gallo & Gustavo Islas Valverde & Miguel Mayorga Rojas & Lorena Romero-Salazar & Juan Carlos Arteaga-Arcos, 2020. "Use of EPD System for Designing New Building Materials: The Case Study of a Bio-Based Thermal Insulation Panel from the Pineapple Industry By-Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6864-:d:403259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magrassi, Fabio & Rocco, Elena & Barberis, Stefano & Gallo, Michela & Del Borghi, Adriana, 2019. "Hybrid solar power system versus photovoltaic plant: A comparative analysis through a life cycle approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 290-304.
    2. Mayorga, M. & Romero-Salazar, L. & Velasco, R.M., 1997. "Entropy production bound in a dense gas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 145-156.
    3. Glazyrina, Irina & Glazyrin, Vasiliy & Vinnichenko, Sergey, 2006. "The polluter pays principle and potential conflicts in society," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 324-330, September.
    4. Carlo Strazza & Adriana Del Borghi & Michela Gallo, 2013. "Development of Specific Rules for the Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Carbon Capture and Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Fabio Magrassi & Adriana Del Borghi & Michela Gallo & Carlo Strazza & Michela Robba, 2016. "Optimal Planning of Sustainable Buildings: Integration of Life Cycle Assessment and Optimization in a Decision Support System (DSS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriana Del Borghi & Thomas Spiegelhalter & Luca Moreschi & Michela Gallo, 2021. "Carbon-Neutral-Campus Building: Design Versus Retrofitting of Two University Zero Energy Buildings in Europe and in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Katia Perini & Fabio Magrassi & Andrea Giachetta & Luca Moreschi & Michela Gallo & Adriana Del Borghi, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Building Retrofit through Vertical Greening Systems: A Life-Cycle Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Michela Gallo & Luca Moreschi & Michela Mazzoccoli & Veronica Marotta & Adriana Del Borghi, 2020. "Sustainability in Maritime Sector: Waste Management Alternatives Evaluated in a Circular Carbon Economy Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Luca Moreschi & Adriana Del Borghi & Angela Celeste Taramasso & Michela Gallo, 2020. "Waste Management under Emergency Conditions: Life-Cycle Multicriteria Analysis as Decision Support System," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Norasikin Ahmad Ludin & Nurfarhana Alyssa Ahmad Affandi & Kathleen Purvis-Roberts & Azah Ahmad & Mohd Adib Ibrahim & Kamaruzzaman Sopian & Sufian Jusoh, 2021. "Environmental Impact and Levelised Cost of Energy Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Systems in Selected Asia Pacific Region: A Cradle-to-Grave Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Awan, Ahmed Bilal & Zubair, Muhammad & Chandra Mouli, Kotturu V.V., 2020. "Design, optimization and performance comparison of solar tower and photovoltaic power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. José Luis Míguez & Jacobo Porteiro & Raquel Pérez-Orozco & Miguel Ángel Gómez, 2018. "Technology Evolution in Membrane-Based CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Cristina Brunelli & Francesco Castellani & Alberto Garinei & Lorenzo Biondi & Marcello Marconi, 2016. "A Procedure to Perform Multi-Objective Optimization for Sustainable Design of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Alizadeh, Sadegh & Avami, Akram, 2021. "Development of a framework for the sustainability evaluation of renewable and fossil fuel power plants using integrated LCA-emergy analysis: A case study in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1548-1564.
    10. Filippos Lygerakis & Nikos Kampelis & Dionysia Kolokotsa, 2022. "Knowledge Graphs’ Ontologies and Applications for Energy Efficiency in Buildings: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-32, October.
    11. Guo, Peng & Zhou, Lei & Lu, Haoyang & Ning, Xizhan & Liu, Tingting & Zhang, Hongfu, 2025. "Mutually reinforcing performance of energy harvest and wind environment via wind turbine-solar integrated system over a bridge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    12. Wang, Richard & Lam, Chor-Man & Hsu, Shu-Chien & Chen, Jieh-Haur, 2019. "Life cycle assessment and energy payback time of a standalone hybrid renewable energy commercial microgrid: A case study of Town Island in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 760-775.
    13. Fiammetta Rita Bianchi & Barbara Bosio, 2021. "Operating Principles, Performance and Technology Readiness Level of Reversible Solid Oxide Cells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Miceikienė Astrida & Walczak Damian & Misevičiūtė Ieva, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Taxes on Mitigation of Pollution in Agriculture: The Theoretical Approach," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 44(3), pages 263-273, September.
    15. Glazyrina, I. & Zabelina, I. & Klevakina, E., 2010. "Economic Development and Environmental Impact Disparities among Russia's Regions," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 7, pages 70-88.
    16. Walaa S. E. Ismaeel & Marwa Adel Elsayed, 2018. "The Interplay of Environmental Assessment Methods; Characterising the Institutional Background in Egypt," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-27, March.
    17. Diego García-Gusano & Mario Martín-Gamboa & Diego Iribarren & Javier Dufour, 2016. "Prospective Analysis of Life-Cycle Indicators through Endogenous Integration into a National Power Generation Model," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Bobo Zheng & Jiuping Xu, 2014. "Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    19. Rudha Khudhair Mohammed & Hooman Farzaneh, 2023. "Life Cycle Environmental Impacts Assessment of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture for Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant in Iraq, Considering Grassroots and Retrofit Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.
    20. Geng, Shengnan & Wang, Yuan & Zuo, Jian & Zhou, Zhihua & Du, Huibin & Mao, Guozhu, 2017. "Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 176-184.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6864-:d:403259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.