IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4586-d367185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Geospatial Thinking Multiyear Study

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Carbonell-Carrera

    (Area of Cartographic, Geodetic and Photogrammetry Engineering, Department of Techniques and Projects in Engineering and Architecture, Universidad de La Laguna, 38204 La Laguna, Spain)

  • Jose Luis Saorin

    (Area of Engineering Graphics, Department of Techniques and Projects in Engineering and Architecture, Universidad de La Laguna, 38204 La Laguna, Spain)

  • Stephany Hess-Medler

    (Department of Clinical Psychology, Universidad de La Laguna. Psychobiology and Methodology, Area of Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, 38204 La Laguna, Spain)

Abstract

In the field of environmental sustainability and landscape management, geospatial thinking is necessary. A good level of geospatial thinking is related to academic success in engineering degrees. It is relevant, therefore, to detect the possible deficiencies that university students may have in tasks related to geospatial thinking. This research presents the results of a 2014‒2019 multiyear study with agricultural engineering students, in which seven geospatial tasks were analyzed. The statistical analysis shows that geospatial tasks related to slope, stream/water flow, visibility, and relief interpretation are the best at predicting the final course mark. The present research provides quantitative data on the efficiency that four technologies have to reinforce geospatial thinking focused on each task. Augmented Reality is an appropriate 3D technology for geospatial tasks related to route search, stream/water flow, and elevation points. SketchUp Make 2017 and Autodesk 123D Make showed their potential to solve tasks related to terrain slope and visibility analysis. Spatial Data Infrastructure has given the best results in geospatial tasks related to the photointerpretation of the relief and with topographic profiles of the terrain. Our findings will help teachers to select the most appropriate geospatial tasks to include in their courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Carbonell-Carrera & Jose Luis Saorin & Stephany Hess-Medler, 2020. "A Geospatial Thinking Multiyear Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4586-:d:367185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toru Ishikawa, 2016. "Spatial Thinking in Geographic Information Science: Students' Geospatial Conceptions, Map-Based Reasoning, and Spatial Visualization Ability," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(1), pages 76-95, January.
    2. Juan Rojas-Fernández & Carmen Galán-Marín & Carlos Rivera-Gómez & Enrique D. Fernández-Nieto, 2018. "Exploring the Interplay between CAD and FreeFem++ as an Energy Decision-Making Tool for Architectural Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Yuang Guo & Dewancker Bart, 2020. "Optimization of Design Parameters for Office Buildings with Climatic Adaptability Based on Energy Demand and Thermal Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Martin, Geoffrey J., 2005. "All Possible Worlds: A History of Geographical Ideas," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 4, number 9780195168709, Decembrie.
    5. Diego A. Barrado-Timón & Carmen Hidalgo-Giralt, 2019. "The Historic City, Its Transmission and Perception via Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality and the Use of the Past as a Resource for the Present: A New Era for Urban Cultural Heritage and Tourism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianzhen Zhang & Ziyang Wang & Collins Opoku Antwi & Xiaoyu Liang & Jiahao Ge, 2022. "Geospatial Thinking and Sense of Place: The Mediating Role of Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kittisak Lohwanitchai & Daranee Jareemit, 2021. "Modeling Energy Efficiency Performance and Cost-Benefit Analysis Achieving Net-Zero Energy Building Design: Case Studies of Three Representative Offices in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Gigih Rahmandhani Setyantho & Hansaem Park & Seongju Chang, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Performance Assessment for Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Windows in Different Climate Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Adela Rueda Márquez de la Plata & Pablo Alejandro Cruz Franco & Jorge Alberto Ramos Sánchez, 2023. "Applications of Virtual and Augmented Reality Technology to Teaching and Research in Construction and Its Graphic Expression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Lin-Lin Xue & Yen-Rung Chang & Ching-Cheng Shen, 2020. "The Sustainable Development of Organic Agriculture-Tourism: The Role of Consumer Landscape and Pro-Environment Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Jie Zheng & Jianya Gong & Rui Li & Kai Hu & Huayi Wu & Siluo Yang, 2017. "Community evolution analysis based on co-author network: a case study of academic communities of the journal of “Annals of the Association of American Geographers”," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 845-865, November.
    6. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Nur Izzi Md. Yusoff & Amiruddin Ismail & Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid & Nor Aznirahani Mhd Yunin & Sotaro Yukawa, 2021. "Gender and Age Do Matter: Exploring the Effect of Passengers’ Gender and Age on the Perception of Light Rail Transit Service Quality in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Alejandro Valencia-Arias & Paula Rodríguez Correa & Vanessa Garcia-Pineda & Wilmer Londoño & Jefferson Quiroz-Fabra & David García-Arango, 2023. "Identification of the Variables Involved in People’s Intellectual Understanding of Outdoor Cultural and Natural Spaces with the Support of ICT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Sheng Miao & Michael E Meadows & Yushan Duan & Fengtao Guo, 2022. "How Does the Geography Curriculum Contribute to Education for Sustainable Development? Lessons from China and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Marques da Silva António José, 2021. "In Quest of a New AR Technology Application to Enhance the Sustainability of Cultural Tourism: The Olive Heritage in Madeira Through the Looking Glass of a ‘Sandbox’ Approach," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 66-76, December.
    10. Mahmood Shoorcheh, 2018. "What Is This Thing Called Geo-graphy? Episodes in the Theorizing of Geo-Human Interactions," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 13(3), pages 56-67, July.
    11. Matthias Slonski & Tobias Schrag, 2019. "Linear Optimisation of a Settlement Towards the Energy-Plus House Standard," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Muhammad Usman & Georg Frey, 2021. "Multi-Objective Techno-Economic Optimization of Design Parameters for Residential Buildings in Different Climate Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, December.
    13. Nadeem Akhtar & Nohman Khan & Muhammad Mahroof Khan & Shagufta Ashraf & Muhammad Saim Hashmi & Muhammad Muddassar Khan & Sanil S. Hishan, 2021. "Post-COVID 19 Tourism: Will Digital Tourism Replace Mass Tourism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Raniero Sannino, 2023. "Thermal Loads Map and Overall Energy Analysis Depending on Low-Effort Parameters Change: A Commercial Building Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Qiurui Liu & Juntian Huang & Ting Ni & Lin Chen, 2022. "Measurement of China’s Building Energy Consumption from the Perspective of a Comprehensive Modified Life Cycle Assessment Statistics Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. A. I. Treivish, 2022. "Old-Developed Areas under Conditions of Uneven Development," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 6-23, December.
    17. Huang, He & Wang, Honglei & Hu, Yu-Jie & Li, Chengjiang & Wang, Xiaolin, 2022. "Optimal plan for energy conservation and CO2 emissions reduction of public buildings considering users' behavior: Case of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    18. Prof. Dr. Young-Jin Ahn & Mr. Zuhriddin Juraev, 2023. "Discussion on Political Geography through the Book Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 1124-1129, July.
    19. Zhao, Zeming & Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2022. "Identification of the key design parameters of Zero/low energy buildings and the impacts of climate and building morphology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    20. Rafał Kaźmierczak & Agnieszka Szczepańska & Cezary Kowalczyk & Grzegorz Grunwald & Artur Janowski, 2021. "Using AR Technology in Tourism Based on the Example of Maritime Educational Trips—A Conceptual Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4586-:d:367185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.