IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v113y2017i2d10.1007_s11192-017-2515-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community evolution analysis based on co-author network: a case study of academic communities of the journal of “Annals of the Association of American Geographers”

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Zheng

    () (Wuhan University
    Wuhan University)

  • Jianya Gong

    (Wuhan University
    Wuhan University)

  • Rui Li

    () (Wuhan University
    Wuhan University)

  • Kai Hu

    (Wuhan University
    Wuhan University)

  • Huayi Wu

    (Wuhan University
    Wuhan University)

  • Siluo Yang

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

Abstract Academic community evolution reveals the development of scientific collaboration among scientists. These social interactions of researchers can be well reflected by co-author network, making it feasible to investigate academic community through looking into co-author network, and to study community evolution through dynamic co-author network analysis. Existing metrics measure an author’s impact or centrality in co-author network individually, rather than considering the academic community as a whole. Besides, co-authors of a paper usually make different contributions reflected in the name order, which is often ignored in traditional co-author network analysis. Furthermore, attention has been paid mainly on those structure-level characteristics like the small-world coefficient and the clustering coefficient, the content-level characteristics like community, author, and topics, however, are crucial in the understanding of community evolution. To address those problems, we firstly propose a “comprehensive impact index” to evaluate the author in a co-author network by comprehensively considering the statistic-based impact and the network-based centrality. Then the comprehensive index value of all authors in a community is added up to evaluate the community as a whole. Further, a lifecycle strategy is proposed for the community evolution analysis. Taking geography academic community as a pilot study, we select 919 co-authored papers from the flagship journal of “Annals of the Association of American Geographers”. The co-author groups are generated by community detection method. Top three co-author groups are identified through computing with the proposed index and analyzed through the proposed lifecycle strategy from perspective of community structures, member authors, and impacts respectively. The results demonstrate our proposed index and strategy are more efficient for analyzing academic community evolution than traditional methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Zheng & Jianya Gong & Rui Li & Kai Hu & Huayi Wu & Siluo Yang, 2017. "Community evolution analysis based on co-author network: a case study of academic communities of the journal of “Annals of the Association of American Geographers”," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 845-865, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2515-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2515-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2515-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marjan Cugmas & Anuška Ferligoj & Luka Kronegger, 2016. "The stability of co-authorship structures," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 163-186, January.
    2. Chengliang Liu & Qinchang Gui, 2016. "Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: a scientometric overview from 1982 to 2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 159-184, October.
    3. Yuan Wang & Cuiyun Xiang & Peng Zhao & Guozhu Mao & Huibin Du, 2016. "A bibliometric analysis for the research on river water quality assessment and simulation during 2000–2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1333-1346, September.
    4. repec:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1295-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:spr:scient:v:93:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0794-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:spr:scient:v:84:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0129-4 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Martin, Geoffrey J., 2005. "All Possible Worlds: A History of Geographical Ideas," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 4, number 9780195168709.
    8. repec:spr:scient:v:65:y:2005:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-005-0281-4 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2515-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.