IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p52-d299786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Spatial Distribution Equilibrium Evaluation of Health Service Resources at Community Grid Scale in Yichang, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyuan Chen

    (Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Taipa, Macau 999078, China)

  • Yuqi Bai

    (Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Taipa, Macau 999078, China
    Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Center for Healthy Cities, Institute for China Sustainable Urbanization, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Pei Zhang

    (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yichang 443000, China)

  • Jingyuan Qiu

    (Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yichun Hu

    (Smart City Construction Office, Yichang 443000, China)

  • Tianhao Wang

    (Big Data Management Center, Yichang 443000, China)

  • Chengzhong Xu

    (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yichang 443000, China)

  • Peng Gong

    (Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Center for Healthy Cities, Institute for China Sustainable Urbanization, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Whether the supplies of health services and related facilities meet the demand is a critical issue when developing healthy cities. The importance of health services and related facilities in public health promotion has been adequately proved. However, since the community population and resource data are usually available at the scale of an administrative region; it is very difficult to perform further fine-scaled spatial distribution equilibrium evaluation studies. Such kinds of activities are highly expected for precise urban planning and management. Yichang is located in Hubei province, the central part of China, along the Yangzi River. It is leading both of China’s smart cities demonstration project and China’s healthy cities pilot project. Yichang has defined 1271 community grids for urban management and service, where each grid consists of 200 households generally with its population distribution data routinely updated. The research set the 15-min walking distances of the residents as impedance factors, and the numbers and the types of health service resources as attractiveness factors for accessibility evaluation. The resource ratio, richness and per capita number of various health service resources that can be reached within 15 min from the community grid building is used as spatial distribution equilibrium evaluation indicators. The entropy weight method is used to assign the indicator weight value. The obtained fine-scale evaluation results were analyzed. In this way, a community grid-scale spatial distribution equilibrium evaluation of health service resources in Yichang was performed. The proposed research could be of value for rapid and precise evaluation of spatial distribution equilibrium evaluation of a variety of healthy city resources, to support healthy city planning and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyuan Chen & Yuqi Bai & Pei Zhang & Jingyuan Qiu & Yichun Hu & Tianhao Wang & Chengzhong Xu & Peng Gong, 2019. "A Spatial Distribution Equilibrium Evaluation of Health Service Resources at Community Grid Scale in Yichang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:52-:d:299786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Luo & Fahui Wang, 2003. "Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Health Care in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in the Chicago Region," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(6), pages 865-884, December.
    2. Cervero, R. & Duncan, M., 2003. "Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1478-1483.
    3. Neutens, Tijs & Delafontaine, Matthias & Schwanen, Tim & Weghe, Nico Van de, 2012. "The relationship between opening hours and accessibility of public service delivery," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 128-140.
    4. Maria Vittoria Corazza & Nicola Favaretto, 2019. "A Methodology to Evaluate Accessibility to Bus Stops as a Contribution to Improve Sustainability in Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Northridge, M.E. & Sclar, E., 2003. "A joint urban planning and public health framework: Contributions to health impact assessment," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(1), pages 118-121.
    6. Wachs, Martin & Kumagai, T. Gordon, 1973. "Physical accessibility as a social indicator," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 437-456, October.
    7. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2003. "Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6zr1x95m, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. David L. Huff, 1963. "A Probabilistic Analysis of Shopping Center Trade Areas," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 39(1), pages 81-90.
    9. Zhengna Song & Tinggan Yan & Yunjian Ge, 2018. "Spatial Equilibrium Allocation of Urban Large Public General Hospitals Based on the Welfare Maximization Principle: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Christian, H. & Knuiman, M. & Bull, F. & Timperio, A. & Foster, S. & Divitini, M. & Middleton, N. & Giles-Corti, B., 2013. "A new urban planning code's impact on walking: The residential environments project," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(7), pages 1219-1228.
    11. Q Shen, 1998. "Location Characteristics of Inner-City Neighborhoods and Employment Accessibility of Low-Wage Workers," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 25(3), pages 345-365, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marina Lagune-Reutler & Andrew Guthrie & Yingling Fan & David Levinson, 2015. "Transit Riders' Perception of Waiting Time and Stops' Surrounding Environments," Working Papers 000142, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    2. Devin McNally & Rachel Tillinghast & Hiroyuki Iseki, 2022. "Bicycle Accessibility GIS Analysis for Bike Master Planning with a Consideration of Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) and Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Peters, Luke & MacKenzie, Don, 2019. "The death and rebirth of bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for policy and system design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 208-226.
    5. Irina Tumini & Paula Villagra-Islas & Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke, 2017. "Evaluating reconstruction effects on urban resilience: a comparison between two Chilean tsunami-prone cities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1363-1392, February.
    6. Chandra, Shailesh & Jimenez, Jose & Radhakrishnan, Ramalingam, 2017. "Accessibility evaluations for nighttime walking and bicycling for low-income shift workers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 97-108.
    7. Paula Villagra & Carolina Quintana, 2017. "Disaster Governance for Community Resilience in Coastal Towns: Chilean Case Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Dong, Xiaojing & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E. & Bowman, John L. & Walker, Joan L., 2006. "Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 163-180, February.
    9. Rybarczyk, Greg & Gallagher, Laura, 2014. "Measuring the potential for bicycling and walking at a metropolitan commuter university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Xinyu Cao & Patricia L. Mokhtarian, 2012. "The connections among accessibility, self- selection and walking behaviour: a case study of Northern California residents," Chapters, in: Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani (ed.), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning, chapter 5, pages 73-95, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Koh, Puay Ping & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2013. "Comparing pedestrians’ needs and behaviours in different land use environments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 43-50.
    12. Steven R Gehrke & Kelly J Clifton, 2019. "An activity-related land use mix construct and its connection to pedestrian travel," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(1), pages 9-26, January.
    13. Hosseinzadeh, Aryan & Algomaiah, Majeed & Kluger, Robert & Li, Zhixia, 2021. "Spatial analysis of shared e-scooter trips," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Ao, Yibin & Zhang, Yuting & Wang, Yan & Chen, Yunfeng & Yang, Linchuan, 2020. "Influences of rural built environment on travel mode choice of rural residents: The case of rural Sichuan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Ivan BleÄ ić & Arnaldo Cecchini & Tanja Congiu & Giovanna Fancello & Valentina Talu & Giuseppe A Trunfio, 2021. "Capability-wise walkability evaluation as an indicator of urban peripherality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 895-911, May.
    16. Piotr Kaszczyszyn & Natalia Sypion-Dutkowska, 2019. "Walking Access to Public Transportation Stops for City Residents. A Comparison of Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Spencer, Phoebe & Watts, Richard & Vivanco, Luis & Flynn, Brian, 2013. "The effect of environmental factors on bicycle commuters in Vermont: influences of a northern climate," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 11-17.
    18. Wang, Donggen & Lin, Tao, 2013. "Built environments, social environments, and activity-travel behavior: a case study of Hong Kong," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 286-295.
    19. Paul Downward & Peter Dawson, 2016. "Is it Pleasure or Health from Leisure that We Benefit from Most? An Analysis of Well-Being Alternatives and Implications for Policy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 443-465, March.
    20. Mohammad Paydar & Asal Kamani Fard & Marzieh Khaghani, 2020. "Pedestrian Walkways for Health in Shiraz, Iran, the Contribution of Attitudes, and Perceived Environmental Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:52-:d:299786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.