IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p255-d302729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product Redesign for Service Considerations Using Affordances for Service Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Se Kim

    (Creative Design Institute, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

  • Kumiko Suzuki

    (Creative Design Institute, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

  • Seok Jin Hong

    (Tres Works, Seoul 08375, Korea)

Abstract

It is critical to design for affordances, which is the messages of products and services that help human activities when properly perceived, in both product design and service design. Although research on product design for user activities or user-friendly design has been conducted, few efforts have been dedicated to product design for diverse service considerations. In the context of servitization and product-service systems, many new services are devised starting with a product. A systematic method is proposed to redesign products so that value propositions through services can be enhanced by dealing with service activities specifically. By integrating service activities and product functions, affordances for service activities are identified. Affordance features for those affordances are designed and combined into the redesign of a product to support service activities. An illustrative case of a standing wheelchair redesign is described to validate the applicability of the proposed method for product redesign for service considerations. The proposed method enhances through the redesign of products diverse life-cycle services in which many stakeholders are participating to co-create values for societal, entrepreneurial, and ecological sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Se Kim & Kumiko Suzuki & Seok Jin Hong, 2019. "Product Redesign for Service Considerations Using Affordances for Service Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:255-:d:302729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold Tukker, 2004. "Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 246-260, July.
    2. Minkyu Kwon & Jihwan Lee & Yoo S. Hong, 2019. "Product-Service System Business Modelling Methodology Using Morphological Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2017. "Design for product-service systems: a procedure to enhance functional integration of product-service offerings," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2), pages 135-164.
    4. Wolfgang Ulaga & Werner Reinartz, 2011. "Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully," Post-Print hal-00642039, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Fargnoli & Nicolas Haber & Massimo Tronci, 2022. "Case Study Research to Foster the Optimization of Supply Chain Management through the PSS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2021. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems Customization: A Case Study Research in the Medical Equipment Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Siri Jagstedt & Magnus Persson, 2019. "Using Platform Strategies In The Development Of Integrated Product-Service Solutions," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-36, May.
    4. Rönnberg Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Capability configurations for advanced service offerings in manufacturing firms: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5330-5335.
    5. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Li, Ai Qiang & Kumar, Maneesh & Claes, Björn & Found, Pauline, 2020. "The state-of-the-art of the theory on Product-Service Systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Gehringer, Agnieszka, 2016. "Knowledge externalities and sectoral interdependences: Evidence from an open economy perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 240-249.
    8. Vinit Parida & Joakim Wincent, 2019. "Why and how to compete through sustainability: a review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2022. "Product-Service Systems for Circular Supply Chain Management: A Functional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Alina Neamtu Idorasi & Stelian Stancu & Oana Madalina Popescu & Ionut Constantin, 2019. "The customer perspective – an effective and efficient way to differentiate for companies in the globalization era," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 30(1), pages 31-51, December.
    11. Chankook Park, 2022. "Expansion of servitization in the energy sector and its implications," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), July.
    12. Karen V. Czachorowski, 2021. "Cleaning Up Our Act: Systems Engineering to Promote Business Model Innovation for the Offshore Exploration and Production Supply Chain Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Friedrich A. Halstenberg & Kai Lindow & Rainer Stark, 2019. "Leveraging Circular Economy through a Methodology for Smart Service Systems Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-36, June.
    14. Nizar Abdelkafi & Jinou Xu & Margherita Pero & Federica Ciccullo & Antonio Masi, 2023. "Does the combination of sustainable business model patterns lead to truly sustainable business models? Critical analysis of existing frameworks and extensions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 597-634, May.
    15. Levente Szász & László Seer, 2018. "Towards an operations strategy model of servitization: the role of sustainability pressure," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 51-66, June.
    16. Jovanovic, Marin & Raja, Jawwad Z. & Visnjic, Ivanka & Wiengarten, Frank, 2019. "Paths to service capability development for servitization: Examining an internal service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 472-485.
    17. Mar’atus Sholihah & Tatsuru Maezono & Yuya Mitake & Yoshiki Shimomura, 2020. "Formulating Service-Oriented Strategies for Servitization of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-30, November.
    18. Christoph Rennpferdt & Marc Zuefle & Marco Bagusat & Dennis Bender & Dieter Krause, 2023. "Development of Modular Architectures for Product–Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Luna Leoni & Sara Poggesi, 2017. "The relationship between servitization and product-service system: insights from the literature," ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 29-51.
    20. Saccani, Nicola & Visintin, Filippo & Rapaccini, Mario, 2014. "Investigating the linkages between service types and supplier relationships in servitized environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 226-238.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:255-:d:302729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.