IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p757-d202459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Buy Free? Exploring Perceptions of Bottled Water Consumption and Its Environmental Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Paul W. Ballantine

    (UC Business School, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand)

  • Lucie K. Ozanne

    (Department of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurship, UC Business School, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand)

  • Rachel Bayfield

    (Thunder, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA)

Abstract

This exploratory study examines the consumption motivations of those consumers who choose to buy bottled water, while at the same time exploring the perceptions they hold about the potential environmental consequences of their actions. Based upon a sample of sixteen participants aged from 19 to 56, our findings revealed five main themes as to why people purchase bottled water, including: (1) Health, comprising the two subthemes of personal health and cleanliness, (2) the bottle, (3) convenience, (4) taste, and (5) self-image. Our findings also highlighted the perceptions held about the environmental consequences of bottled water consumption and the considerable challenges marketers have to address if they are to persuade consumers to consider alternatives to this consumption practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul W. Ballantine & Lucie K. Ozanne & Rachel Bayfield, 2019. "Why Buy Free? Exploring Perceptions of Bottled Water Consumption and Its Environmental Consequences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:757-:d:202459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/757/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/757/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ha, Young-Won & Hoch, Stephen J, 1989. "Ambiguity, Processing Strategy, and Advertising-Evidence Interactions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(3), pages 354-360, December.
    2. Aradhna Krishna & Maureen Morrin, 2008. "Does Touch Affect Taste? The Perceptual Transfer of Product Container Haptic Cues," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(6), pages 807-818, October.
    3. Lastovicka, John L, et al, 1999. "Lifestyle of the Tight and Frugal: Theory and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 85-98, June.
    4. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    5. Strutton, David & Vitell, Scott J. & Pelton, Lou E., 1994. "How consumers may justify inappropriate behavior in market settings: An application on the techniques of neutralization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 253-260, July.
    6. W. Kip Viscusi & Joel Huber & Jason Bell, 2015. "The Private Rationality Of Bottled Water Drinking," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 33(3), pages 450-467, July.
    7. Alberto Cruz & Barry G. Green, 2000. "Thermal stimulation of taste," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 889-892, February.
    8. Hoch, Stephen J & Ha, Young-Won, 1986. "Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(2), pages 221-233, September.
    9. Ryan S. Elder & Aradhna Krishna, 2010. "The Effects of Advertising Copy on Sensory Thoughts and Perceived Taste," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 748-756, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geir Wæhler Gustavsen & Atle Wehn Hegnes, 2020. "Turning the Tap or Buying the Bottle? Consumers’ Personality, Understanding of Risk, Trust and Conspicuous Consumption of Drinking Water in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Zapata, Oscar, 2021. "The relationship between climate conditions and consumption of bottled water: A potential link between climate change and plastic pollution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Barbara Borusiak & Andrzej Szymkowiak & Bartłomiej Pierański & Katarzyna Szalonka, 2021. "The Impact of Environmental Concern on Intention to Reduce Consumption of Single-Use Bottled Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Isabella Gambino & Francesco Bagordo & Benedetta Coluccia & Tiziana Grassi & Giovanni De Filippis & Prisco Piscitelli & Biagio Galante & Federica De Leo, 2020. "PET-Bottled Water Consumption in View of a Circular Economy: The Case Study of Salento (South Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Farida Saleem, 2021. "Antecedents of the Green Behavioral Intentions of Hotel Guests: A Developing Country Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Mkaddem, Chamseddine & Mahjoubi, Soufiane, 2022. "Climate change and its impact on water consumption in Tunisia: Evidence from ARDL approach," MPRA Paper 115658, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2022.
    7. Jorge Alejandro Silva, 2024. "Ethics of Manufacturing and Supplying Bottled Water: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adilson Borges & Felipe Pantoja & Patricia Rossi & Amanda Yamim, 2020. "If I Touch It, I will Like It! The Role of Tactile Inputs on Gustatory Perceptions of Food Items," Post-Print hal-02507986, HAL.
    2. Davies, Antony & Cline, Thomas W., 2005. "A consumer behavior approach to modeling monopolistic competition," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 797-826, December.
    3. Mikkel Nøjgaard & Cristiano Smaniotto & Søren Askegaard & Ciprian Cimpan & Dmitry Zhilyaev & Henrik Wenzel, 2020. "How the Dead Storage of Consumer Electronics Creates Consumer Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Orlowski, Marissa & Lefebvre, Sarah & Back, Robin M., 2022. "Thinking outside the bottle: Effects of alternative wine packaging," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Soojung Kim & Jiyang Bae, 2016. "Cross-cultural differences in concrete and abstract corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns: perceived message clarity and perceived CSR as mediators," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Marco Wolf & Shaun McQuitty, 2011. "Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(3), pages 154-170, December.
    7. Goldsmith, Ronald E. & Reinecke Flynn, Leisa & Clark, Ronald A., 2014. "The etiology of the frugal consumer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 175-184.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8658 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Ryan S Elder & Ann E Schlosser & Morgan Poor & Lidan Xu & Darren DahlEditor & JoAndrea HoeggAssociate Editor, 2017. "So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay between Sensory Imagery and Psychological Distance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 877-894.
    10. Bublitz, Melissa G. & Peracchio, Laura A., 2015. "Applying industry practices to promote healthy foods: An exploration of positive marketing outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2484-2493.
    11. Jean-Charles Pillet & Federico Pigni & Claudio Vitari, 2017. "Learning About Ambiguous Technologies: Conceptualization And Research Agenda," Post-Print halshs-01923653, HAL.
    12. Lin, Lily & Hoegg, JoAndrea & Aquino, Karl, 2018. "When Beauty Backfires: The Effects of Server Attractiveness on Consumer Taste Perceptions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 296-311.
    13. Cowan, Kirsten & Spielmann, Nathalie & Horn, Esther & Griffart, Clovis, 2021. "Perception is reality… How digital retail environments influence brand perceptions through presence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 86-96.
    14. Aguirre, Elizabeth & Mahr, Dominik & Grewal, Dhruv & de Ruyter, Ko & Wetzels, Martin, 2015. "Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 34-49.
    15. Madzharov, Adriana V., 2019. "Self-Control and Touch: When Does Direct Versus Indirect Touch Increase Hedonic Evaluations and Consumption of Food," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 170-185.
    16. Pantoja, Felipe & Borges, Adilson & Rossi, Patricia & Yamim, Amanda Pruski, 2020. "If I touch it, I will like it! The role of tactile inputs on gustatory perceptions of food items," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    17. Cuneo, Andres & Milberg, Sandra J. & Alarcon-del-Amo, Maria del Carmen & Lopez-Belbeze, Pilar, 2019. "Private label and manufacturer brand choice in a new competitive reality: Strategic directions and the future of brands," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 117-128.
    18. Anika Stuppy & Nicole L Mead & Stijn M J Van Osselaer & JoAndrea Hoegg & Eileen Fischer & Kirmani Amna, 2020. "I Am, Therefore I Buy: Low Self-Esteem and the Pursuit of Self-Verifying Consumption [The Origins of Deference: When Do People Prefer Lower Status?]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(5), pages 956-973.
    19. Guillard, Valérie, 2009. "La tendance de certains consommateurs à tout garder," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/5480 edited by Pinson, Christian.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3603 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Courtney Szocs & Dipayan Biswas, 2016. "Forks over Spoons: The Impact of Cutlery on Calorie Estimates," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 161-174.
    22. Marco Pichierri & Daniele Scarpi & Gabriele Pizzi, 2018. "To buy or to rent? An experimental study on the antecedents of consumers? acquisition-mode decisions," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 63-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:757-:d:202459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.