IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p6923-d294406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Analysis of Strengthening Existing RC Structures with R-PE-UHPFRC

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Hajiesmaeili

    (Maintenance and Safety of Structures, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Francesco Pittau

    (Institute of Construction and Infrastructure Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Emmanuel Denarié

    (Maintenance and Safety of Structures, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Guillaume Habert

    (Institute of Construction and Infrastructure Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

(PE)-UHPFRC, a novel strain hardening ultra high-performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) with low clinker content, using Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMW-PE) fibers, was developed for structural applications of rehabilitation. A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) was carried out to study the environmental impact of interventions on an existing bridge using PE-UHPFRC compared with conventional UHPFRC and post-tensioned reinforced concrete methods in three categories of global warming potential (GWP), cumulative energy demand (CED), and ecological scarcity (UBP). The results showed 55% and 29% decreases in the environmental impact of the PE-UHPFRC compared with reinforced concrete and conventional UHPFRC methods, respectively, which highlighted the effectiveness of this material for the rehabilitation/strengthening of structures from the viewpoint of environmental impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Hajiesmaeili & Francesco Pittau & Emmanuel Denarié & Guillaume Habert, 2019. "Life Cycle Analysis of Strengthening Existing RC Structures with R-PE-UHPFRC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6923-:d:294406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Stern,Nicholas, 2007. "The Economics of Climate Change," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521700801.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svetlana Pushkar & Yuri Ribakov, 2020. "Life-Cycle Assessment of Strengthening Pre-Stressed Normal-Strength Concrete Beams with Different Steel-Fibered Concrete Layers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Numa Bertola & Célia Küpfer & Edgar Kälin & Eugen Brühwiler, 2021. "Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Bridge Designs Involving UHPFRC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Endress, Lee H. & Pongkijvorasin, Sittidaj & Roumasset, James & Wada, Christopher A., 2014. "Intergenerational equity with individual impatience in a model of optimal and sustainable growth," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 620-635.
    2. Manel Kamoun & Ines Abdelkafi & Abdelfetah Ghorbel, 2019. "The Impact of Renewable Energy on Sustainable Growth: Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 221-237, March.
    3. Lee H. Endress & James A. Roumasset & Christopher A. Wada, 2020. "Do Natural Disasters Make Sustainable Growth Impossible?," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 319-345, July.
    4. Moritz A. Drupp, 2018. "Limits to Substitution Between Ecosystem Services and Manufactured Goods and Implications for Social Discounting," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(1), pages 135-158, January.
    5. Choumert, Johanna & Combes Motel, Pascale & Dakpo, Hervé K., 2013. "Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 19-28.
    6. Tilman Altenburg & Wilfried Lütkenhorst, 2015. "Industrial Policy in Developing Countries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14726.
    7. Ahn, Joongha & Woo, JongRoul & Lee, Jongsu, 2015. "Optimal allocation of energy sources for sustainable development in South Korea: Focus on the electric power generation industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 78-90.
    8. repec:lib:000cis:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:41-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Sven Ove Hansson, 2018. "How to Perform an Ethical Risk Analysis (eRA)," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1820-1829, September.
    10. Lucas Bretschger, 2018. "Greening Economy, Graying Society," CER-ETH Press, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich, edition 2, number 18-001.
    11. Sachs, Jeffrey D. & Someshwar, Shiv, 2012. "Green Growth and Equity in the Context of Climate Change: Some Considerations," ADBI Working Papers 371, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    12. Graciela Chichilnisky & Peter J. Hammond & Nicholas Stern, 2020. "Fundamental utilitarianism and intergenerational equity with extinction discounting," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(2), pages 397-427, March.
    13. Michael Jacobs, 2012. "Green Growth: Economic Theory and Political Discourse," GRI Working Papers 92, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    14. Roman Inderst & Eftichios Sartzetakis & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "Technical Report on Sustainability and Competition," DEOS Working Papers 2103, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    15. Helen Scarborough & Jeff Bennett, 2012. "Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distributional Preferences," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14376.
    16. Sotiropoulou, Irene & Deutz, Pauline, 2021. "Understanding the bioeconomy: a new sustainability economy in British and European public discourse," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 10(4), December.
    17. Scarborough, Helen & Bennett, Jeff, 2008. "Estimating intergenerational distribution preferences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 575-583, July.
    18. Klaas Lenaerts & Simone Tagliapietra & Guntram B. Wolff, 2022. "The Global Quest for Green Growth: An Economic Policy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Cheryl Desha & Karlson 'Charlie' Hargroves, 2014. "A Peaking and Tailing Approach to Education and Curriculum Renewal for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Hui‐Cheng Yu & Bor‐Yuan Tsai, 2018. "Environmental policy and sustainable development: An empirical study on carbon reduction among Chinese enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 1019-1026, September.
    21. Charlotta Söderberg, 2014. "What drives sub-national bioenergy development? Exploring cross-level implications of environmental policy integration in EU and Swedish bioenergy policy," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 3(2), pages 119-137, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6923-:d:294406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.