IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p6000-d281176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Analysis of Primary Construction Materials Sourcing under Geopolitical Uncertainties: A Case Study of Qatar

Author

Listed:
  • Shaikha Al-Nuaimi

    (Division of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar)

  • Abdul-Aziz A. Banawi

    (Department of Construction Management & Engineering, College of Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA)

  • Sami G. Al-Ghamdi

    (Division of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar)

Abstract

Environmental and economic cycles under varying geopolitical uncertainties can lead to unsustainable patterns that significantly and negatively affect the welfare of nations. With the ever-increasing negative environmental and economic impacts, the ability to achieve sustainability is hindered if the implications are not properly assessed in challenging geopolitical crises. The infrequent and fluctuating nature of these challenging geopolitical settings causes disregard and neglect for exploration within this issue. In this study, a comparative life cycle assessment was conducted as a method to evaluate the environmental and economic impacts of construction material flow across country boundaries. Based on the results found from the life cycle assessment, an environmental forecast and sensitivity analysis were established. Considering the State of Qatar as a case study, asphalt and bitumen, cement, limestone, sand, and steel were analyzed from gate-to-gate depending on transportation mode and distances used within both the pre-crisis and post-crisis sub-periods, comparing carbon emissions and costs. The results showed that the mode of transport plays a significant role in terms of carbon dioxide emissions as opposed to distance traveled. However, the increase in distance coupled to the majority shift from land to sea-based transport resulted in an overall increase in carbon emissions and costs post-crisis. In addition, the analysis of the environmental and economic impact assessment using the average CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 -e) per kilogram and the unit price of the five primary construction materials has shown a significant, 70.68% increase in global warming potentials (GWP) after the crisis, coupled with an increase in the overall cost. An assessment of environmental and economic impacts during geopolitical uncertainties allows for the significant ability to realize sustainable measures to greatly reduce economic and environmental degradation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaikha Al-Nuaimi & Abdul-Aziz A. Banawi & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2019. "Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Analysis of Primary Construction Materials Sourcing under Geopolitical Uncertainties: A Case Study of Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6000-:d:281176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6000/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6000/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eskandarpour, Majid & Dejax, Pierre & Miemczyk, Joe & Péton, Olivier, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-32.
    2. Palak, Gökçe & Ekşioğlu, Sandra Duni & Geunes, Joseph, 2014. "Analyzing the impacts of carbon regulatory mechanisms on supplier and mode selection decisions: An application to a biofuel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 198-216.
    3. Mallidis, Ioannis & Dekker, Rommert & Vlachos, Dimitrios, 2012. "The impact of greening on supply chain design and cost: a case for a developing region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 118-128.
    4. Li, Mengyu & Zhang, Xiongwen & Li, Guojun, 2016. "A comparative assessment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles using a well-to-wheel analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 693-704.
    5. Mallidis, I. & Dekker, R. & Vlachos, D., 2010. "Greening Supply Chains: Impact on Cost and Design," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-39b, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    7. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    8. Soud K. Al-Thani & Cynthia P. Skelhorn & Alexandre Amato & Muammer Koc & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2018. "Smart Technology Impact on Neighborhood Form for a Sustainable Doha," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Mohamad Monkiz Khasreen & Phillip F. G. Banfill & Gillian F. Menzies, 2009. "Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-28, September.
    10. Gheidar Kheljani, J. & Ghodsypour, S.H. & O'Brien, C., 2009. "Optimizing whole supply chain benefit versus buyer's benefit through supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 482-493, October.
    11. Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz & Yusoff, Sumiani, 2015. "A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 244-248.
    12. Amorim, Pedro & Curcio, Eduardo & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana P.F.D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2016. "Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 801-814.
    13. Rashid Khan, Haroon Ur & Siddique, Muhammad & Zaman, Khalid & Yousaf, Sheikh Usman & Shoukry, Alaa Mohamd & Gani, Showkat & Sasmoko, & Khan, Aqeel & Hishan, Sanil S. & Saleem, Hummera, 2018. "The impact of air transportation, railways transportation, and port container traffic on energy demand, customs duty, and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of low-, middle-, and high -income coun," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 18-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Maryam Hussain Abal-Seqan & Shaligram Pokharel & Khalid Kamal Naji, 2023. "Key Success Factors and Their Impact on the Performance of Construction Projects: Case in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Kai-Hua Wang & Jia-Min Kan & Cui-Feng Jiang & Chi-Wei Su, 2022. "Is Geopolitical Risk Powerful Enough to Affect Carbon Dioxide Emissions? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Qamri, Ghulam Muhammad & Sheng, Bin & Adeel-Farooq, Rana Muhammad & Alam, Gazi Mahabubul, 2022. "The criticality of FDI in Environmental Degradation through financial development and economic growth: Implications for promoting the green sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Abdul-Aziz Banawi & Alia Besné & David Fonseca & Jose Ferrandiz, 2020. "A Three Methods Proactive Improvement Model for Buildings Construction Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Alena Oulehlova & Irena Tušer & David Rehak, 2021. "Environmental Risk Assessment of a Diesel Fuel Tank: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Abdelaziz El Shinawi & Peter Mésároš & Martina Zeleňáková, 2020. "The Implication of Petrographic Characteristics on the Mechanical Behavior of Middle Eocene Limestone, 15th May City, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Isuru Hettiarachchi & James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi & Wajiha Mohsin Shahzad & Ravindu Kahandawa, 2025. "Bridging Sustainability and Performance: Conceptualizing Net-Zero Integration in Construction Supply Chain Evaluations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Chen, Limei & Gozgor, Giray & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Pal, Shreya & Rather, Kashif Nesar, 2023. "How does geopolitical risk affect CO2 emissions? The role of natural resource rents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    2. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    3. Noori-Daryan, Mahsa & Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Jolai, Fariborz, 2019. "Analyzing pricing, promised delivery lead time, supplier-selection, and ordering decisions of a multi-national supply chain under uncertain environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 236-248.
    4. Ventura, José A. & Bunn, Kevin A. & Venegas, Bárbara B. & Duan, Lisha, 2021. "A coordination mechanism for supplier selection and order quantity allocation with price-sensitive demand and finite production rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    7. Schöll, Michaela, 2017. "Three Essays on Sustainable Supply Chain Management – Towards Sustainable Supplier Selection and Sustainable Sourcing," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 172463.
    8. Hu, Kuo-Jen & Yu, Vincent F., 2016. "An integrated approach for the electronic contract manufacturer selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 68-81.
    9. Olapiriyakul, Sun & Nguyen, Thi T., 2019. "Land use and public health impact assessment in a supply chain network design problem: A case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 70-81.
    10. Ahmad Faiz Abd Rashid & Juferi Idris & Sumiani Yusoff, 2017. "Environmental Impact Analysis on Residential Building in Malaysia Using Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Jiangtao Hong & Chaher Alzaman & Ali Diabat & Akif Bulgak, 2019. "Sustainability dimensions and PM2.5 in supply chain logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 339-366, April.
    12. Kellner, Florian & Lienland, Bernhard & Utz, Sebastian, 2019. "An a posteriori decision support methodology for solving the multi-criteria supplier selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 505-522.
    13. José Roberto Mendoza-Fong & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Juan Carlos Sáenz Diez Muro & Julio Blanco Fernández, 2017. "The Role of Green and Traditional Supplier Attributes on Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Santos, Andreia & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & Marques, Alexandra & Amorim, Pedro, 2019. "Assessment and optimization of sustainable forest wood supply chains – A systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 112-135.
    15. Ting-Kwei Wang & Qian Zhang & Heap-Yih Chong & Xiangyu Wang, 2017. "Integrated Supplier Selection Framework in a Resilient Construction Supply Chain: An Approach via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Merve Er Kara & Seniye Ümit Oktay Fırat, 2018. "Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Daniel González-Prieto & Yolanda Fernández-Nava & Elena Marañón & Maria Manuela Prieto, 2020. "Effect of Decarbonisation Policies and Climate Change on Environmental Impacts due to Heating and Cooling in a Single-Family House," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Kadziński, Miłosz & Tervonen, Tommi & Tomczyk, Michał K. & Dekker, Rommert, 2017. "Evaluation of multi-objective optimization approaches for solving green supply chain design problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 168-184.
    19. Yu, Yugang & Hong, Zhaofu & Zhang, Linda L. & Liang, Liang & Chu, Chengbin, 2013. "Optimal selection of retailers for a manufacturing vendor in a vendor managed inventory system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 273-284.
    20. Yadavalli, Venkata SS & Darbari, Jyoti Dhingra & Bhayana, Nidhi & Jha, P.C. & Agarwal, Vernika, 2019. "An integrated optimization model for selection of sustainable suppliers based on customers’ expectations," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6000-:d:281176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.