IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4335-d362827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Three Methods Proactive Improvement Model for Buildings Construction Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul-Aziz Banawi

    (Department of Construction Management and Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA)

  • Alia Besné

    (Gretel-Group de REcerca on Technology Enhanced Learning, La Salle, Ramon Llull University, 08022 Barcelona, Spain)

  • David Fonseca

    (Gretel-Group de REcerca on Technology Enhanced Learning, La Salle, Ramon Llull University, 08022 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jose Ferrandiz

    (Technology Department, Nortfolk State University, Nortfolk, VA 23504, USA)

Abstract

This paper proposes a proactive model to improve the overall performance of construction processes. The main advantage is that potential waste and associate impacts could be identified in the early stages of a project before the construction phase. To accomplish that, the model combines three methods; Lean-to identify waste, Green to assess environmental impact, and Six-Sigma to measure and improve process performance (LG6). The LG6 model helps in evaluating processes one step at a time, identifying consumed resources, analyzing the environmental performance of all steps as well as highlighting generated impacts, applying improving alternatives if needed, and measuring process performance for evaluation. The functionality of LG6 is illustrated through a case study of woodpiles installation. In this case study, the LG6 model identified four steps out of eight that are considered potential waste or (non-value-added steps) according to the Lean principles. As a result, the LG6 model helped in reducing impact by 9% and expenses by 1%. The LG6 model can help to improve the performance of construction processes and reduces unnecessary waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul-Aziz Banawi & Alia Besné & David Fonseca & Jose Ferrandiz, 2020. "A Three Methods Proactive Improvement Model for Buildings Construction Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4335-:d:362827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mostafa J. Sabbagh & Osama E. Mansour & Abdulaziz A. Banawi, 2019. "Grease the Green Wheels: A Framework for Expediting the Green Building Movement in the Arab World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Anass Cherrafi & Said Elfezazi & Kannan Govindan & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes & Khalid Benhida & Ahmed Mokhlis, 2017. "A framework for the integration of Green and Lean Six Sigma for superior sustainability performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 4481-4515, August.
    3. Preetam Singh Negi & Akash Mandaliya & Abhijit Mahida & Alap Patel & Vishal Singh Patyal, 2017. "Six Sigma in construction industry: a review," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4), pages 451-465.
    4. Rodney Stewart & Clinton Spencer, 2006. "Six-sigma as a strategy for process improvement on construction projects: a case study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 339-348.
    5. Mehmet Tolga Taner, 2013. "Critical Success Factors for Six Sigma Implementation in Large-scale Turkish Construction Companies," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 3(4), pages 212-225.
    6. Shaikha Al-Nuaimi & Abdul-Aziz A. Banawi & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2019. "Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Analysis of Primary Construction Materials Sourcing under Geopolitical Uncertainties: A Case Study of Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Richard Hill & Paul Bowen, 1997. "Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 223-239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohsin Malik & Salam Abdallah, 2019. "Sustainability Initiatives in Emerging Economies: A Socio-Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Maryam Hussain Abal-Seqan & Shaligram Pokharel & Khalid Kamal Naji, 2023. "Key Success Factors and Their Impact on the Performance of Construction Projects: Case in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Hai Pham & Soo-Yong Kim & Truong-Van Luu, 2020. "Managerial perceptions on barriers to sustainable construction in developing countries: Vietnam case," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 2979-3003, April.
    5. Farrukh, Amna & Mathrani, Sanjay & Sajjad, Aymen, 2023. "Green-lean-six sigma practices and supporting factors for transitioning towards circular economy: A natural resource and intellectual capital-based view," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Ivars LINDE & Dmitry PHILIPPOV, 2020. "Applying Lean Six Sigma in construction. World practice experience," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 1(2), pages 103-111, September.
    7. Effrosyni Taraza & Sofia Anastasiadou & Andreas Masouras & Christos Papademetriou, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Implementation of Quality Management Excellence Models in Public Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Reza Kiani Mavi & Denise Gengatharen & Neda Kiani Mavi & Richard Hughes & Alistair Campbell & Ross Yates, 2021. "Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Amri, Tariq Al & Otaibi, Naif Al & Marey-Perez, Manuel, 2023. "The Major Obstacles and Factors Facing Green Building in the KSA: A Background Study," OSF Preprints a352b, Center for Open Science.
    10. Lorenz Werndle & Nick Brown & Mike Packer, 2006. "Barriers to certified timber and paper uptake in the construction and paper industries in the United Kingdom," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 121-134, July.
    11. Gabriel Jobidon & Pierre Lemieux & Robert Beauregard, 2019. "Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-75, April.
    12. Shuvo Dip Datta & Bassam A. Tayeh & Ibrahim Y. Hakeem & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh, 2023. "Benefits and Barriers of Implementing Building Information Modeling Techniques for Sustainable Practices in the Construction Industry—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    13. Aryn Lisitza & Gregor Wolbring, 2016. "Sustainability within the Academic EcoHealth Literature: Existing Engagement and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, February.
    14. M. R. Darabpour & J. Majrouhi Sardroud & J. Smallwood & M. Darabpour & G. Tabarsa, 2022. "A legal management model towards sustainable development: an approach in Iranian green construction," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7874-7895, June.
    15. Iwaro, Joseph & Mwasha, Abrahams & Williams, Rupert G. & Zico, Ricardo, 2014. "An Integrated Criteria Weighting Framework for the sustainable performance assessment and design of building envelope," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 417-434.
    16. Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Giner Alor-Hernández & Cuauhtémoc Sánchez-Ramírez & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández & Juan I. Latorre-Biel, 2018. "Mediating Role of the Six Sigma Implementation Strategy and Investment in Human Resources in Economic Success and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Aldossary, Naief A. & Rezgui, Yacine & Kwan, Alan, 2015. "Consensus-based low carbon domestic design framework for sustainable homes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 417-432.
    18. Sasha Shahbazi & Martin Kurdve & Mats Zackrisson & Christina Jönsson & Anna Runa Kristinsdottir, 2019. "Comparison of Four Environmental Assessment Tools in Swedish Manufacturing: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Halil Ibrahim Cebeci & Shahryar Ghorbani & Renata Činčikaitė, 2021. "An Integrated Approach for Evaluating Lean Innovation Practices in the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Celil Gokay Ekinci & Mehmet Tolga Taner & Engin Erbas, 2015. "Integration of Six Sigma Methodology to Reduce Complications in a Private Hemodialysis Center," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 5(1), pages 36-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4335-:d:362827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.