IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i20p5556-d274530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Risky Driving Behavior of Novice Drivers

Author

Listed:
  • Longhai Yang

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

  • Xiqiao Zhang

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

  • Xiaoyan Zhu

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

  • Yule Luo

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

  • Yi Luo

    (Traffic Management Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security, Wuxi 214151, China)

Abstract

Novice drivers have become the main group responsible for traffic accidents because of their lack of experience and relatively weak driving skills. Therefore, it is of great value and significance to study the related problems of the risky driving behavior of novice drivers. In this paper, we analyzed and quantified key factors leading to risky driving behavior of novice drivers on the basis of the planned behavior theory and the protection motivation theory. We integrated the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the theory of planned behavior (PMT) to extensively discuss the formation mechanism of the dangerous driving behavior of novice drivers. The theoretical analysis showed that novice drivers engage in three main risky behaviors: easily changing their attitudes, overestimating their driving skills, and underestimating illegal driving. On the basis of the aforementioned results, we then proposed some specific suggestions such as traffic safety education and training, social supervision, and law construction for novice drivers to reduce their risky behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Longhai Yang & Xiqiao Zhang & Xiaoyan Zhu & Yule Luo & Yi Luo, 2019. "Research on Risky Driving Behavior of Novice Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5556-:d:274530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5556/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5556/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Kang & Ling, Feiyang & Feng, Zhongxiang & Wang, Kun & Shao, Cheng, 2017. "Why do drivers continue driving while fatigued? An application of the theory of planned behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 141-149.
    2. Chen, Shang-Yu, 2016. "Using the sustainable modified TAM and TPB to analyze the effects of perceived green value on loyalty to a public bike system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 58-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huacai Xian & Yujia Hou & Yu Wang & Shunzhong Dong & Junying Kou & Zewen Li, 2022. "Influence of Risky Driving Behavior and Road Section Type on Urban Expressway Driving Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Wei Luo & Silong Wei & Yi Wang & Pengpeng Jiao, 2023. "People’s Intentions to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Weiwei Qi & Shufang Zhu & Wanqing Long, 2023. "Exploring the factors that affect the defensive driving behavior of bus drivers: the application of TPB and PMT theories," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 227-251, March.
    4. Francisco Alonso & Cristina Esteban & Mireia Faus & Sergio A. Useche, 2022. "Differences in the Assessment of Safe and Risky Driving Behaviors: Pedestrians Versus Drivers," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad A. Saleem & Hina Ismail & Rao Akmal Ali, 2021. "Actions Speak Louder than Words: Investigating the Interplay between Descriptive and Injunctive Norms to Promote Alternative Fuel Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Liping Pang & Pei Li & Liang Guo & Xin Wang & Hongquan Qu, 2022. "Prediction Method of Human Fatigue in an Artificial Atmospheric Environment Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm, 2019. "Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external inf," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-384.
    4. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Sajjad, Aqsa & Zhang, Qingyu & Asmi, Fahad & Anwar, Muhammad Azfar & Bhatia, Meena, 2024. "Identifying the motivating factors to promote socially responsible consumption under circular economy: A perspective from norm activation theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Farzana Sharmin & Alina Badulescu & Darie Gavrilut & Ke Xue, 2021. "Social Media-Based Content towards Image Formation: A New Approach to the Selection of Sustainable Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Wei Luo & Silong Wei & Yi Wang & Pengpeng Jiao, 2023. "People’s Intentions to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Su, Diep Ngoc & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Vo, Nguyen S. & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "Factors influencing intention to use on-demand shared ride-hailing services in Vietnam: risk, cost or sustainability?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Muhammad Danish & Saqib Ali & Muhammad Azeem Ahmad & Hasan Zahid, 2019. "The Influencing Factors on Choice Behavior Regarding Green Electronic Products: Based on the Green Perceived Value Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Lapo Mola & Quentin Berger & Karoliina Haavisto & Isabella Soscia, 2020. "Mobility as a Service: An Exploratory Study of Consumer Mobility Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Jonathan Jared Ignacio & Roy Alvin Malenab & Carla Mae Pausta & Arnel Beltran & Lawrence Belo & Renan Ma. Tanhueco & Marlon Era & Ramon Christian Eusebio & Michael Angelo Promentilla & Aileen Orbecido, 2018. "Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Eco-Toilet Systems in Rural Areas: A Case Study in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Bircan Arslannur & Ahmet Tortum, 2023. "Public Transport Modeling for Commuting in Cities with Different Development Levels Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Liang, Jyun-Kai & Eccarius, Timo & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2019. "Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 799-812.
    14. Yixin Wang & Huiqin Li & Lanlan Xue & Wenjuan Gou, 2022. "The Evolution of the Construction Waste Recycling System and the Willingness to Use Recycled Products in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Jun Li & Jiachao Shen & Bicen Jia, 2021. "Exploring Intention to Use Shared Electric Bicycles by the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Yunteng Chen & Xianyong Liu & Jinliang Xu & Huan Liu, 2022. "Underestimated Risk Perception Characteristics of Drivers Based on Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Huidong Sun & Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Naveed Ahmad & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Guping Cheng & Malik Zia-Ud-Din & Qinghua Fu, 2020. "CSR, Co-Creation and Green Consumer Loyalty: Are Green Banking Initiatives Important? A Moderated Mediation Approach from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Biehl, Alec & Ermagun, Alireza & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2019. "Utilizing multi-stage behavior change theory to model the process of bike share adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 30-45.
    19. Lei Zhang & Zhenwei Chu & Huanbin Song, 2019. "Understanding the Relation between BIM Application Behavior and Sustainable Construction: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Ning, Yu & Yan, Mian & Xu, Su Xiu & Li, Yina & Li, Lixu, 2021. "Shared parking acceptance under perceived network externality and risks: Theory and evidence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-15.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5556-:d:274530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.