IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i1p241-d195161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 5E Model of Environmental Engagement: Bringing Sustainability Change to Higher Education through Positive Psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Cathy Macharis

    (MOBI Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Dorit Kerret

    (The Department of Public Policy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel)

Abstract

What is the role of universities in advancing sustainability? This paper delineates a unique program for promoting sustainability that was applied in Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB). The unique characteristics of the program are described in light of the positive sustainability framework. The five components of the program are designed to promote sustainable behavior of participants, through promoting goal-oriented hope: setting a goal; believing that one can successfully achieve the chosen goal (agency thinking); viewing the potential paths for achieving the goal (pathway thinking); and trusting other members of society to follow the same desired goal (social trust). The five components of the program are designed to jointly raise all the elements of hope. It starts with goal setting (estimate), which is aimed at evaluating the impact of the university on the physical environment. Secondly, the entire community of the university should be engaged in achieving the desired goal. The third component of the method is education about the potential options and actions for achieving the designed goal. Then, enabling the achievement of the goal takes place (meaning making it easy). Lastly, participants should be encouraged to pursue the goal by positive rewarding.

Suggested Citation

  • Cathy Macharis & Dorit Kerret, 2019. "The 5E Model of Environmental Engagement: Bringing Sustainability Change to Higher Education through Positive Psychology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:241-:d:195161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Macharis, Cathy & De Witte, Astrid & Turcksin, Laurence, 2010. "The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) application in the Flemish long-term decision making process on mobility and logistics," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 303-311, September.
    2. F Marijn Stok & Stefan Hoffmann & Dorothee Volkert & Heiner Boeing & Regina Ensenauer & Marta Stelmach-Mardas & Eva Kiesswetter & Alisa Weber & Harald Rohm & Nanna Lien & Johannes Brug & Michelle Hold, 2017. "The DONE framework: Creation, evaluation, and updating of an interdisciplinary, dynamic framework 2.0 of determinants of nutrition and eating," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lai Kuan Lee & Nor Azazi Zakaria & Keng Yuen Foo, 2021. "Psychological Restorative Potential of a Pilot on-Campus Ecological Wetland in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Tammie Ronen & Dorit Kerret, 2020. "Promoting Sustainable Wellbeing: Integrating Positive Psychology and Environmental Sustainability in Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Philippe Odou & Marie Schill, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Post-Print hal-02929920, HAL.
    4. Giorgio Mion & Angela Broglia & Angelo Bonfanti, 2019. "Do Codes of Ethics Reveal a University’s Commitment to Sustainable Development? Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Odou, Philippe & Schill, Marie, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 243-253.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joëlle Morana, 2014. "Assessing urban logistics pooling sustainability via a hierarchic dashboard from a group decision perspective," Working Papers halshs-01053887, HAL.
    2. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Cathy Macharis & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "Multi-actor and multi-criteria analysis in evaluating mega-projects," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 11, pages 242-266, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Alessio Ishizaka & Philippe Nemery, 2013. "A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Framework for Partner Grouping When Sharing Facilities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 773-799, July.
    5. Dekker, Rommert & Bloemhof, Jacqueline & Mallidis, Ioannis, 2012. "Operations Research for green logistics – An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 671-679.
    6. Cruz-Daraviña, Paola Andrea & Bocarejo Suescún, Juan Pablo, 2021. "Freight operations in city centers: A land use conflict in urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    8. Castro-Nuño, Mercedes & Arévalo-Quijada, M. Teresa, 2018. "Assessing urban road safety through multidimensional indexes: Application of multicriteria decision making analysis to rank the Spanish provinces," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 118-129.
    9. Hans, Michiels & Carolien, Beckx & Liesbeth, Schrooten & Stijn, Vernaillen & Tobias, Denys, 2012. "Exploring the transition to a clean vehicle fleet: From stakeholder views to transport policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 70-79.
    10. Maria Lindholm, 2013. "Urban freight transport from a local authority perspective – a literature review," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 54, pages 1-3.
    11. Hayley Butcher & Sarah Burkhart & Nicholas Paul & Ulusapeti Tiitii & Karibanang Tamuera & Taati Eria & Libby Swanepoel, 2020. "Role of Seaweed in Diets of Samoa and Kiribati: Exploring Key Motivators for Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Dean, M., 2021. "Participatory multi-criteria analysis methods: Comprehensive, inclusive, transparent and user-friendly? An application to the case of the London Gateway Port," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Claudia Valli & Marilina Santero & Anna Prokop-Dorner & Victoria Howatt & Bradley C. Johnston & Joanna Zajac & Mi-Ah Han & Ana Pereira & Fernando Kenji Nampo & Gordon H. Guyatt & Malgorzata M. Bala & , 2021. "Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    15. Ludmiła Filina-Dawidowicz & Mariusz Kostrzewski, 2022. "The Complexity of Logistics Services at Transshipment Terminals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Franceschini, Simone & Marletto, Gerardo, 2015. "Assessing the benefits and the shortcomings of participation – findings from a test in Bari (Italy)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 33-42.
    17. Sunil Tiwari & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Justyna Żywiołek, 2022. "Internet of Things as a Sustainable Energy Management Solution at Tourism Destinations in India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Arne Höltl & Cathy Macharis & Klaas De Brucker, 2017. "Pathways to Decarbonise the European Car Fleet: A Scenario Analysis Using the Backcasting Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Kinga Kijewska & Witold Torbacki & Stanisław Iwan, 2018. "Application of AHP and DEMATEL Methods in Choosing and Analysing the Measures for the Distribution of Goods in Szczecin Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    20. Sun, Hui & Zhang, Yiting & Wang, Yuning & Li, Lei & Sheng, Yun, 2015. "A social stakeholder support assessment of low-carbon transport policy based on multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: The case of Tianjin," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 103-116.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:241-:d:195161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.