IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5370-d271703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of the Mechanism of the Community of Shared Future on the Innovation Performance of Knowledge Workers: The Intermediary Role of Extra-Role Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Jianping Gu

    (School of Business, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing210046, China)

  • Hanxiao Wu

    (School of Business, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing210046, China)

  • Yan Li

    (School of Business, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing210046, China)

  • Evan David Hermawan

    (School of Business, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing210046, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between the community of shared future, extra-role behavior, and innovation performance. This paper conducts an empirical study based on 334 valid sample data items of 53 technology-based small to medium enterprises (SMEs) in China. The data were subjected to structural equation analysis using SPSS 20.0 software. The results show that the community of shared future positively affects the extra-role behavior of employees and their innovation performance and has a positive impact on knowledge sharing behavior, voice behavior, and helping behavior. Knowledge sharing behavior, voice behavior, and helping behavior all play a mediating role between the community of shared future and employees’ innovation performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianping Gu & Hanxiao Wu & Yan Li & Evan David Hermawan, 2019. "Influence of the Mechanism of the Community of Shared Future on the Innovation Performance of Knowledge Workers: The Intermediary Role of Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5370-:d:271703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gee W. Bock & Young-Gul Kim, 2002. "Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 15(2), pages 14-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shengxian Yu & Xiaoxiao Gong & Na Wu, 2020. "Job Insecurity and Employee Engagement: A Moderated Dual Path Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chieh-Peng Lin, 2007. "To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 411-428, February.
    2. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Dorine Maurice Mattar, 2021. "An Organizational Change With Quarantined Members," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    4. Sajjad Jasimuddin & Jun Li & Nicholas Perdikis, 2015. "Linkage between geographic space and knowledge transfer by multinational enterprises: a structural equation approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 769-795, May.
    5. Kim, Youngseek & Adler, Melissa, 2015. "Social scientists’ data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 408-418.
    6. Hani El-Chaarani & Zouhour El-Abiad, 2020. "Knowledge Management and Job Performance: The Case of Lebanese Banking Sector," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 91-98.
    7. Jule B. Gassenheimer & Judy A. Siguaw & Gary L. Hunter, 2013. "Exploring motivations and the capacity for business crowdsourcing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(4), pages 205-216, December.
    8. Hong Wu & Zhaohua Deng & Bin Wang & Sumeet Gupta, 2021. "How does service price influence patients’ decisions? An examination of the free-market pricing mechanism in online health communities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 877-893, December.
    9. Qin Ying & Md Mukitul Hoque & Sang-Joon Lee, 2023. "What factors determine users’ knowledge payment decisions? A mixed-method study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Chmielecki Michał, 2013. "Culture as a barrier of knowledge sharing," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 101-111, June.
    11. Seba, Ibrahim & Rowley, Jennifer & Lambert, Sian, 2012. "Factors affecting attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing in the Dubai Police Force," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 372-380.
    12. Yingmiao Qian & Mengjun Wang & Yang Zou & Ruoyu Jin & Ruijia Yuan & Qinge Wang, 2019. "Understanding the Double-Level Influence of Guanxi on Construction Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Knowledge Sharing and the Cross-Level Moderating Role of Inter-Organizationa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Dominique Lepore & Sabrina Dubbini & Alessandra Micozzi & Francesca Spigarelli, 2022. "Knowledge Sharing Opportunities for Industry 4.0 Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 501-520, March.
    14. Wayne H. Stewart Jr. & Ruth C. May & Donna E. Ledgerwood, 2015. "Do You Know What I Know? Intent to Share Knowledge in the US and Ukraine," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 737-773, December.
    15. Wu, Jih-Hwa & Cheng, Chih-Ming & Cheng, Po-Jen, 2015. "Behavioral intention toward urban eco-land performance assessment models using TPB tests," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 771-776.
    16. Seckyoung Loretta Kim & Soojung Han & Seung Yeon Son & Seokhwa Yun, 2017. "Exchange ideology in supervisor-subordinate dyads, LMX, and knowledge sharing: A social exchange perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 147-172, March.
    17. Víctor Yepes & Salvador López, 2023. "The Knowledge Sharing Capability in Innovative Behavior: A SEM Approach from Graduate Students’ Insights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Norhanishah Mohamad Yunus & Tajul Ariffin Masron, 2020. "Spillover Effects of Inward Foreign Direct Investment on Labour Productivity: An Analysis on Skill Composition in Manufacturing Industry," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(10), pages 593-611, October.
    19. Fan-Chuan Tseng & Yen-Jung Fan, 2011. "Exploring the Influence of Organizational Ethical Climate on Knowledge Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 325-342, June.
    20. Michael Twum-Darko & Lee-Anne Lesley Harker, 2017. "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in an Organization: A Perspective of Actor-Network Theory," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 53-74, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5370-:d:271703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.