IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4663-d261435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Land Abandonment and Farmers’ Perceptions of Land Use Change in the Indus Plains of Pakistan: A Case Study of Sindh Province

Author

Listed:
  • Habibullah Rajpar

    (College of Land Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, No. 1, Shizishan Street, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Anlu Zhang

    (College of Land Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, No. 1, Shizishan Street, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Amar Razzaq

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, No. 1, Shizishan Street, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Khalid Mehmood

    (Adaptive Research Farm Chakwal, Directorate General Agriculture (Extension and Adaptive Research), Government of Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Maula Bux Pirzado

    (Department of Economics, Sindh Agricultural University, Tandojam Hyderabad 70060, Pakistan)

  • Weiyan Hu

    (College of Land Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, No. 1, Shizishan Street, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Agriculture is the mainstay of Pakistan’s economy. However, it has been noticed that farmers are increasingly giving up agriculture in favor of non-agricultural activities. This study was conducted in the Khairpur district of Sindh province, which is part of the Indus Plains in Pakistan. The main purpose of the study was to investigate the current and future land use change (LUC) trends and to study farmers’ perceptions of the causes and consequences of LUC and agricultural land abandonment (ALA) in the study area. The study used field survey data and secondary data obtained from the government sources. The results show that agricultural land in the region has decreased by about 9% in the past two decades. Survey data analysis confirms this because more than 80% of farmers believe that agricultural land in the area has declined over time. In addition, farmers believe that socioeconomic and environmental changes are the main reasons for LUC and ALA. We used a logistic regression model to determine the factors that influence farmers’ decisions to sell agricultural land for other uses. The results show that the age, income, land ownership, farm inheritance by successors, social networks and lack of basic facilities in the study area are the main determinants of farmers’ decisions to sell agricultural lands. In particular, farmers’ integration into the social network and their belief that the farm will be inherited by heirs reduces the possibility of selling land. As for the consequences of LUC and ALA, the results indicate that farmland prices, weeds infestation, urban diffusion, and pressure on existing infrastructure have increased in the study area. In addition, the results show that the prospects of farming in the area remain grim as most farmers indicated that they were willing to abandon agricultural lands in favor of other revenue generation activities. The study suggests that policymakers should pay close attention to controlling rapid LUC and ALA to keep lands green.

Suggested Citation

  • Habibullah Rajpar & Anlu Zhang & Amar Razzaq & Khalid Mehmood & Maula Bux Pirzado & Weiyan Hu, 2019. "Agricultural Land Abandonment and Farmers’ Perceptions of Land Use Change in the Indus Plains of Pakistan: A Case Study of Sindh Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4663-:d:261435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4663/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4663/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schnicke, Hauke Joachim, 2010. "Impacts of socio-economic factors on farm household dynamics - empirical survey data in an agent-based model application," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 94905, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Ruben N. Lubowski & Andrew J. Plantinga & Robert N. Stavins, 2008. "What Drives Land-Use Change in the United States? A National Analysis of Landowner Decisions," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(4), pages 529-550.
    3. Kara A. Kuntz & Frederic Beaudry & Karen L. Porter, 2018. "Farmers’ Perceptions of Agricultural Land Abandonment in Rural Western New York State," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Lusho, Sherif & Papa, Dhimiter, 1998. "Land Fragmentation And Consolidation In Albania," Working Papers 12792, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center.
    5. Lindon J. Robison & Robert J. Myers & Marcelo E. Siles, 2002. "Social Capital and the Terms of Trade for Farmland," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 44-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Irfan & Jacob Cherian & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & Akram M. Haddad & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Basit Ali & Talles Vianna Brugni, 2022. "Measuring the Impact of Air Pollutants on Ecological Footprint, Forest Area and Cropland," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 444-452.
    2. Kamal Hussain & Fazlur Rahman & Ihsan Ullah & Zahir Ahmad & Udo Schickhoff, 2024. "Animals Feed in Transition: Intricate Interplay of Land Use Land Cover Change and Fodder Sources in Kurram Valley, Pakistan," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Saqib, Shahab E. & Kaleem, Muhammad & Yaseen, Muhammad & Yang, Shang-Ho & Visetnoi, Supawan, 2024. "From green fields to housing societies: Unraveling the mysteries behind agricultural land conversion in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Achmad T. Nugraha & Gunawan Prayitno & Faizah A. Azizi & Nindya Sari & Izatul Ihsansi Hidayana & Aidha Auliah & Enock Siankwilimba, 2023. "Structural Equation Model (SEM) of Social Capital with Landowner Intention," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Subedi, Yuba Raj & Kristiansen, Paul & Cacho, Oscar, 2022. "Reutilising abandoned cropland in the Hill agroecological region of Nepal: Options and farmers’ preferences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Bonoua Faye & Guoming Du, 2021. "Agricultural Land Transition in the “Groundnut Basin” of Senegal: 2009 to 2018," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Clarisse Mendoza Gonzalvo & Wilson Jr. Florendo Aala & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2022. "Is Implementing a Biotech Ban Correct or Not? Analysis of Farmer Perceptions and Attitudes on the Philippine Supreme Court’s Ban on Biotech Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Shahzad Khan & Ghulam Sadiq Afridi & Arif Alam & Sher Khan, 2025. "Effects of Sustainable Agricultural Practices on Income and Environmental Sustainability of Small Farm Households in Rural Pakistan," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 12862-12882, September.
    9. Hasan, Faizan ul & Fatima, Bareerah & Heaney-Mustafa, Sandra, 2021. "A critique of successful elements of existing on-farm irrigation water management initiatives in Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    10. Bo Liu & Wei Song & Qian Sun, 2022. "Status, Trend, and Prospect of Global Farmland Abandonment Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-30, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kara A. Kuntz & Frederic Beaudry & Karen L. Porter, 2018. "Farmers’ Perceptions of Agricultural Land Abandonment in Rural Western New York State," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Pranab K Roy Chowdhury & James C Robertson & Phillip S Levin & Michael J Case & Daniel G Brown, 2025. "Opportunities and challenges to community-level adoption of natural climate solutions in Washington State," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Carrión-Flores, Carmen E. & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso & Guci, Ledia, 2018. "An estimator for discrete-choice models with spatial lag dependence using large samples, with an application to land-use conversions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 77-93.
    5. Chakir, Raja & Lungarska, Anna, 2015. "Agricultural land rents in land use models: a spatial econometric analysis," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212641, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Ji, Yongjie & Rabotyagov, Sergey & Kling, Catherine L., 2014. "Crop Choice and Rotational Effects: A Dynamic Model of Land Use in Iowa in Recent Years," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170366, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Cao, Yueming & Bai, Yunli & Zhang, Linxiu, 2021. "Plot Size, Adjacency, and Farmland Rental Contract Choice," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Ji, Yongjie & Rabotyagov, sergey & Valcu-Lisman, Adriana, 2015. "Estimating Adoption of Cover Crops Using Preferences Revealed by a Dynamic Crop Choice Model," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205799, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Allan, Corey & Kerr, Suzi & Owen, Sally, 2020. "Over-valued or over-looked? A theoretical and empirical investigation of agricultural land values against profitability in Aotearoa New Zealand," Working Paper Series 9129, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    10. Li, Sheng & Nadolnyak, Denis & Hartarska, Valentina, 2019. "Agricultural land conversion: Impacts of economic and natural risk factors in a coastal area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 380-390.
    11. Zack Dorner & Dean Hyslop, 2014. "Modelling Changing Rural Land Use in New Zealand 1997 to 2008 Using a Multinomial Logit Approach," Motu Working Papers 14_12, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    12. Maples, Chellie H. & Hagerman, Amy D. & Lambert, Dayton M., 2022. "Ex-ante effects of the 2018 Agricultural Improvement Act’s grassland initiative," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Marco Maialetti & Clio Ciaschini & Giovanni Quaranta & Rosanna Salvia & Donato Scarpitta & Stefano Bigiotti & Francesco Maria Chelli & Luca Salvati, 2024. "Investigating ‘Land-Use Trajectories’ in Mediterranean Rural Areas with Official Statistics and a Multiway Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Yang Bai & Jian Yang & Thomas O. Ochuodho & Bobby Thapa, 2024. "Impacts of Land Ownership and Forest Fragmentation on Water-Related Ecosystem Services Provision, Dynamics and Their Economic Valuation in Kentucky," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Wenche E. Dramstad & Neil Sang & Henrik Forsberg-Mathiesen & Anders Bryn, 2021. "Five Ways of Characterizing Agricultural Land Use Dynamics and Abandonment from Subsidy Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Mariano Mezzatesta & David A. Newburn & Richard T. Woodward, 2013. "Additionality and the Adoption of Farm Conservation Practices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 89(4), pages 722-742.
    17. Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2010. "EU Land Markets and the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-31.
    18. Lan, Jing & Liu, Zhen, 2019. "Social network effect on income structure of SLCP participants: Evidence from Baitoutan Village, China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Elena G. Irwin & Andrew M. Isserman & Maureen Kilkenny & Mark D. Partridge, 2010. "A Century of Research on Rural Development and Regional Issues," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(2), pages 522-553.
    20. Araujo, Rafael & Costa, Francisco J M & Sant'Anna, Marcelo, 2020. "Efficient Forestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Evidence from a Dynamic Model," SocArXiv 8yfr7, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4663-:d:261435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.