IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3684-d245761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Layout of Static Guidance Information in Comprehensive Transportation Hubs Based on Passenger Pathfinding Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Minhua Shao

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, 4800 Cao’an Highway, Shanghai 201804, China
    Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Congcong Xie

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, 4800 Cao’an Highway, Shanghai 201804, China
    Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Lijun Sun

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, 4800 Cao’an Highway, Shanghai 201804, China
    Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Lijuan Jiang

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, 4800 Cao’an Highway, Shanghai 201804, China
    Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Passenger orientation (pathfinding) is an important factor in designing the layout of comprehensive transportation hubs, especially for static guidance sign systems. In essence, static guidance signs within the hub should be designed according to passengers’ pathfinding demand, that is, to provide passengers with accurate information at the appropriate location. Therefore, from the perspective of passenger information demand, this study aims to determine the appropriate location and density of static guidance information. Two types of passenger information demand in the pathfinding process are defined in this study: one is generated at the path decision point, where multiple path options exist; the other is at the points between decision points, where pathfinders need to confirm that they are still on the correct path. According to the interaction of pathfinding behavior and guidance information, the abstract relationship model is established between macro-behavioral characteristics and the micro-psychological state. Moreover, based on walking speed analysis, the judgment criterion of passenger psychology in pathfinding is proposed to determine the spatial location and density of guidance information. The analysis results of Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport show that, under the threshold of the speed drop section given in the study, 80% of passenger information demand is satisfied when guidance information spacing is 47 m, and 60% of information demand is satisfied when the spacing is 56 m. The findings presented in this paper can provide a reference for the optimal design of static guidance information in comprehensive transportation hubs.

Suggested Citation

  • Minhua Shao & Congcong Xie & Lijun Sun & Lijuan Jiang, 2019. "Optimal Layout of Static Guidance Information in Comprehensive Transportation Hubs Based on Passenger Pathfinding Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3684-:d:245761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tam, Mei Ling, 2011. "An optimization model for wayfinding problems in terminal building," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 74-79.
    2. Jianxin Lin & Rui Song & Jifeng Dai & Pengpeng Jiao, 2014. "Pedestrian Guiding Signs Optimization for Airport Terminal," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-14, February.
    3. Marisol Castro & Francisco Martínez & Marcela Munizaga, 2013. "Estimation of a constrained multinomial logit model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 563-581, May.
    4. Maël Lebreton & Karin Bacily & Stefano Palminteri & Jan B Engelmann, 2019. "Contextual influence on confidence judgments in human reinforcement learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Lam, W.H.K. & Tam, Mei-ling & Wong, S.C. & Wirasinghe, S.C., 2003. "Wayfinding in the passenger terminal of Hong Kong International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 73-81.
    6. Carlos F. Daganzo & Yosef Sheffi, 1977. "On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 253-274, August.
    7. Churchill, Anthony & Dada, Ezekiel & de Barros, Alexandre G. & Wirasinghe, S.C., 2008. "Quantifying and validating measures of airport terminal wayfinding," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 151-158.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiarui Ren & Guangxiong Mao & Fei Zhang & Yuhang Wei, 2020. "Research on Investment Decision-Making in Waterway Engineering Based on the Hub Economic Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Yifei Suo & Bin Lei & Tianxiang Xun & Na Li & Dongbo Lei & Linlin Luo & Xiaoqin Cao, 2023. "Optimization Method of Subway Station Guide Sign Based on Pedestrian Walking Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Lu & Yu Ye, 2019. "Can people memorize multilevel building as volumetric map? A study of multilevel atrium building," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 225-242, February.
    2. Paul Symonds & David H.K. Brown & Valeria Lo Iacono, 2017. "Exploring an Absent Presence: Wayfinding as an Embodied Sociocultural Experience," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 48-67, February.
    3. Thampan, Aromal & Sinha, Kapil & Gurjar, B.R. & Rajasekar, E., 2020. "Functional efficiency in airport terminals: A review on Overall and Stratified Service Quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Phelipe Medeiros da Rocha & Helder Gomes Costa & Glauco Barbosa da Silva, 2022. "Gaps, Trends and Challenges in Assessing Quality of Service at Airport Terminals: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Wei, Chong & Asakura, Yasuo & Iryo, Takamasa, 2014. "Formulating the within-day dynamic stochastic traffic assignment problem from a Bayesian perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 45-57.
    6. Ahipaşaoğlu, Selin Damla & Meskarian, Rudabeh & Magnanti, Thomas L. & Natarajan, Karthik, 2015. "Beyond normality: A cross moment-stochastic user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 333-354.
    7. Theodore Tsekeris & Klimis Vogiatzoglou, 2011. "Spatial agent-based modeling of household and firm location with endogenous transport costs," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 77-98, July.
    8. E. Nikolova & N. E. Stier-Moses, 2014. "A Mean-Risk Model for the Traffic Assignment Problem with Stochastic Travel Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 366-382, April.
    9. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Watling, David P., 2015. "On multi-objective stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 704-717.
    10. Huang, Ruqing & Han, Lee D. & Huang, Zhongxiang, 2022. "A new network equilibrium flow model: User-equilibrium with quantity adjustment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Castillo, Enrique & Menéndez, José María & Sánchez-Cambronero, Santos, 2008. "Predicting traffic flow using Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 482-509, June.
    12. Ji, Xiangfeng & Chu, Yanyu, 2020. "A target-oriented bi-attribute user equilibrium model with travelers’ perception errors on the tolled traffic network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Du, Muqing & Tan, Heqing & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "A faster path-based algorithm with Barzilai-Borwein step size for solving stochastic traffic equilibrium models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 982-999.
    14. Bell, Michael G. H., 1995. "Stochastic user equilibrium assignment in networks with queues," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-137, April.
    15. Ampol Karoonsoontawong & Dung-Ying Lin, 2015. "Combined Gravity Model Trip Distribution and Paired Combinatorial Logit Stochastic User Equilibrium Problem," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1011-1048, December.
    16. Dial, Robert B., 1997. "Bicriterion traffic assignment: Efficient algorithms plus examples," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 357-379, October.
    17. Sun, Mingmei, 2023. "A day-to-day dynamic model for mixed traffic flow of autonomous vehicles and inertial human-driven vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Yao, Rui & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2022. "A variational autoencoder approach for choice set generation and implicit perception of alternatives in choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 273-294.
    19. Ma, Jie & Meng, Qiang & Cheng, Lin & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2022. "General stochastic ridesharing user equilibrium problem with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 162-194.
    20. Tsui, Wai Hong Kan & Fung, Michael Ka Yiu, 2016. "Analysing passenger network changes: The case of Hong Kong," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-11.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3684-:d:245761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.